Language & Grammar discussion

note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
1135 views
Grammar Central > Ask Our Grammar "Experts"

Comments Showing 151-200 of 1,580 (1580 new)    post a comment »

message 151: by Tyler (last edited Jul 17, 2008 06:04PM) (new)

Tyler  (tyler-d) | 268 comments No, it's not argumentative because the guidebooks themselves allow discretion in the matter. As you can see, this group is made to order for us pedants.

The only unresolved matter is that Debbie drives on the wrong side of the road and claims I do. She probably has said the best word on the comma situation, but the "wrong" side of the road is supposed to be defined in terms of American exceptionalism. Next she'll be telling us they don't vote either Democratic or Republican.



message 152: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
Sometimes I don't, either...


message 153: by Terena (new)

Terena Scott | 6 comments This explains why a writer (including me!) will add and erase commas when revising their manuscript for the thousandth time, telling me "It's not done yet" until I finally have to snatch it out of their trembling hands saying "ENOUGH." I swear, commas were created to drive writers CRAZY.


message 154: by Ruth (new)

Ruth | 16546 comments Mod
I can't remember which writer it was, but he was quoted as saying he'd worked all morning taking a comma out, then had spent the afternoon putting it back in.


message 155: by Tyler (new)

Tyler  (tyler-d) | 268 comments Oscar Wilde


message 156: by Ruth (new)

Ruth | 16546 comments Mod
Thanks.


message 157: by Debbie, sardonic princess of cheerfulness (new)

Debbie (sardonicprincessofcheerfulness) | 6389 comments Mod
In NZ, Australia and Great Britain, we drive on the correct side of the road....in America you drive on the other!!!! This is not an argument....it is a statement of fact. :-)


message 158: by [deleted user] (new)

I'm a Head of EAL Department at a school in Vietnam, and have worked in China trying to find what Prabha has asked for, standarized testing for ESL kids at young ages.

The problem with TESOL is that it's adult-biased. And yes the Young Learners from Cambridge is pretty good, but you'll have to supplement it with other stuff too.

The problem is that with young learners you have all sorts of developmental issues to be mindful of. Teaching contractions to a 8 year-old probably isn't the best idea, that sort of thing.

Basically, the answer is no. You'll have to be creative.


message 159: by Debbie, sardonic princess of cheerfulness (new)

Debbie (sardonicprincessofcheerfulness) | 6389 comments Mod
....and no Relyt, we don't vote Democrat or Republican. We vote National or Labour.


message 160: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
Welcome, Brainysmurf! And thanks for answering Prabha's question from long ago! (We're still trying to get Prabha back on board, but the urgencies of reall life have called her.)


message 161: by Tyler (new)

Tyler  (tyler-d) | 268 comments Well, Debbie, you all are just plain un-American down there, and I don't know how to account for NE's lack of support for the ruling parties, whose stewardship has gotten us where we are today.

Given our road preferences, you're a left-winger and I'm a right-winger.


message 162: by Debbie, sardonic princess of cheerfulness (new)

Debbie (sardonicprincessofcheerfulness) | 6389 comments Mod
I am so right-wing that my mother barely speaks to me (about politics anyway!). I suspect that I would be deeply Republican if I wasn't so un-American!!!!


message 163: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
Touche

(Apologies to the Francophiles. Can't do the accent aigu on this laptop.)




message 164: by Tyler (new)

Tyler  (tyler-d) | 268 comments Here's a sentence I came across:

"I don't know whatever happened to self-respect."

Shouldn't that be "what ever" in this case? Or is the single word becoming standard?


message 165: by Debbie, sardonic princess of cheerfulness (new)

Debbie (sardonicprincessofcheerfulness) | 6389 comments Mod
As my kids said in the middle of their teen years...."Whatever"!!!


message 166: by Ken, Moderator (last edited Jul 20, 2008 05:19PM) (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
I looked up the usage of "whatever" both as a pronoun and as an adjective and neither seems to work so well in that sentence. The question, though, is who is going to get down in the mud to fight over a space? Tyler, too? (or is it "Tyler too?).


message 167: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
Um, what ever DID happen to Baby Jane (now some 46 years old... if nothing happened, I mean).


message 168: by Lasairfiona (new)

Lasairfiona | 20 comments I always put the space in. The word without the space seems like an interjection al la Debbie's kids. However, even dictionary.com disagrees with me. The usage has changed.

(Totally no comma before Tyler. Totally no pause there. Totally.)


message 169: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
But Tyler gives us pause all the time...


message 170: by Debbie, sardonic princess of cheerfulness (new)

Debbie (sardonicprincessofcheerfulness) | 6389 comments Mod
....so do my kids. Whatever!


message 171: by Tyler (last edited Jul 21, 2008 01:38PM) (new)

Tyler  (tyler-d) | 268 comments Here's a way to drive yourself crazy.

1. "I don't know whatever happened to Baby Jane."

2. "I don't know what ever happened to Baby Jane."

Okay, grammatically they're different. The first instance introduces a noun clause modifying the main clause.

The second shows "ever" modifying "happened" What happened ... in the end; finally?

But semantically, have we really said anything different? Is there a clear distinction in what the two sentences mean?


message 172: by Debbie, sardonic princess of cheerfulness (new)

Debbie (sardonicprincessofcheerfulness) | 6389 comments Mod
I think the first has connotations of 'what in the world happened to BJ' - meaning over a period of time and the second is, as relyt said, 'what ever happened to her finally'.
That's my 2 cents worth...for whatever it is worth!!!


message 173: by Lasairfiona (last edited Jul 22, 2008 02:04AM) (new)

Lasairfiona | 20 comments Or you could delete the "ever" and make the sentence clearer. ;)

ps to NE: Here is how to make the neat accent marks in MSWord (scroll down a bit for the window's version). For any program, the alt + # works.

Or you could always spell it wrong and save the accented version in your browser's dictionary.

I'm happy I looked it up because I didn't know what the shortcuts were for the mac. And those shortcuts work in any program. I <3 mac.

So, all together now: Touché.


message 174: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
L -- Thanks for the cheat sheet. I <3 cheat sheets. Haven't met Mac yet...


message 175: by Debbie, sardonic princess of cheerfulness (new)

Debbie (sardonicprincessofcheerfulness) | 6389 comments Mod
Doesn't work for me (what else is new!!!)


message 176: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
Me, either.

-- Alt + 3-less


message 177: by Lasairfiona (new)

Lasairfiona | 20 comments Well, you do have to type it in quickly for the alt plus #s to work. You could also take the first link and copy paste the letters as you go. Sorry it didn't work for all of you.


message 178: by M.D. (new)

M.D. (mdbenoit) This may not technically be a grammar question, more of a semantics one, but what is the difference between "take" and "bring" in usage? Is it a question of proximity? For instance, when do I use "I'll take him there" versus "I'll bring him there?"

I always use the wrong one, it seems.

Sorry if this question is in the wrong discussion.


message 179: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
Hmn. In many cases I see "take" as more of an "away" word and "bring" as more of a "to" word. But yes, in the example you use ("I'll take him there") it seems interchangeable.

The mass of men are better at being "takers" than "bringers"; I know that much!


message 180: by Ruth (last edited Jul 23, 2008 12:19PM) (new)

Ruth | 16546 comments Mod
NE is on the right track. It has to do with geography.

If I'm standing next to you and talking about something, say the Golden Gate Bridge, that's away from us, I would say about a third party, "I'll take him there."

If we were on the phone and you were already at the Bridge, and I was coming to see you, I'd say about a third party, "I'll bring him there."

To you, "Can I bring anything to your party?"

To my husband, "I'm taking cookies to the party."




message 181: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
Bring it or leave it, M.d. Hope the geography lesson helped.

And Ginnie wins the "archival response" award for using Post #206 to answer Post #14 written by a guy (Grumpus) who, odds are, doesn't even read this thread anymore and hasn't since Arbor Day (or some such bizarre-o day or other).


message 182: by M.D. (new)

M.D. (mdbenoit) I'm not sure, I think I'm still confused and that maybe because we have two similar words in French but one means taking someone there and leaving whereas the other is taking someone with you there and staying.

It's not quite the same, right?

So I'll say "I'll take him (from here to go) there" but "I'll bring him there (to you)."

Is that correct?




message 183: by M.D. (new)

M.D. (mdbenoit) Thanks Bunny


message 184: by [deleted user] (new)

Are there any good Internet sites dealing with grammatical rules?


message 185: by Ken, Moderator (last edited Aug 06, 2008 11:00AM) (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
Cheers, Norm! (It's a "Where everybody knows your name" joke.) Truth be told, I don't know of a single authoritative site for grammar. It's too big and unwieldy (not to mention controversial) a subject. Handbooks are another thing. My go-to gal is author Diana Hacker. She's written plenty of grammar books and has her own website (dianahacker.com) so you might find one that fits your needs.

Or not. Good luck!


message 186: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
Real men don't use the semicolon? Never knew there were sexist wars (much less Yanks v. Brit wars) over it!

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ide...



message 187: by Boreal Elizabeth (new)

Boreal Elizabeth | 401 comments i love semi-colons
they are the most useful of all punctuation;yah i know
and what is all this blather about choosing
the rule is, if you are changing the very thought and direction of the sentence the semi-colon is the swinging door to get you there

and it's semi-colon isn't it?

17.7? oh woe is we


message 188: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
Hmn. I never use a hyphen when writing semicolon. Just plow ahead, from i to shining c.

Odd thing is, I've actually tried to use the occasional semicolon when writing fiction -- you know, to add variety. Never thought of it as pretentious. Certainly never thought of it as wimpy (like eating quiche, which I also am happy to do if someone else can make a better one than I can).

Funny thing is, two sentences separated by a semicolon are actually considered ONE sentence -- a compound sentence, in fact. IC;IC. (IC = Independent Clause).


message 189: by Nikki (new)

Nikki Boisture | 19 comments Can someone help me with Further vs. Farther? There is a sign on an office building near here that is having trouble getting tenants. The sign says "Why drive farther? Lease here for a shorter commute." If I was writing that sentence, I would have written "Why drive further?". But I'm not at all secure in that wording.
Thanks!


message 190: by Ruth (new)

Ruth | 16546 comments Mod
That's one that always confuses me, too.

Waiting to be enlightened...


message 191: by Boreal Elizabeth (new)

Boreal Elizabeth | 401 comments i don't want to discuss this any further because the info isn't in a book across the room
so i would have to go farther to retrieve it

further is conceptual
farther is geographical?


message 192: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
According to Diana Hacker in Rules for Writers, 2nd Edition:

"Farther describes distances: Chicago is farther from Miami than I thought.

Further suggests quantity or degree: You extended the curfew further than you should have."




message 193: by Savvy (new)

Savvy  (savvysuzdolcefarniente) | 1458 comments This is what I've always thought...but don't know the rule!


message 194: by Nikki (new)

Nikki Boisture | 19 comments Thanks! The sign was right and I was wrong...ah well. At least I learned something!


message 195: by Ruth (new)

Ruth | 16546 comments Mod
By Jove, I think I've got it!


message 196: by M.D. (new)

M.D. (mdbenoit) Here's one for the language gurus:

What is the difference in usage between onset and outset. Do I say "At the outset of the crisis" or "At the onset of the crisis?"

Is onset used mainly when talking about diseases?


message 197: by Tyler (new)

Tyler  (tyler-d) | 268 comments Thanks, Bunny -- the distinction between the words is finely drawn. I learn definitions easily enough, but connotations are much harder to fix.


message 198: by M.D. (new)

M.D. (mdbenoit) Thanks, Bunny, your explanation makes perfect sense. In my case, then, onset is definitely the word I want to use, since I'm talking about a skirmish that escalates into a war.


message 199: by Boreal Elizabeth (last edited Aug 29, 2008 05:00PM) (new)

Boreal Elizabeth | 401 comments i set out one day to join a group of
language gurus
hoping to improve my rather lax leanings and mindless meanderings
if i had only known at the outset that they would lead me down such a winding path
i may have hesitated or mayhaps i would have hastened my pace
in eager anticipation of the journey
realizing it was just the onset of daffy definitions and subtle assimilation
of grammaretics

;)


message 200: by Ken, Moderator (last edited Aug 29, 2008 05:06PM) (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
At the outset of that explanation, I was still confused. Now I get it, even though you can get easily distracted because Onset is Uncas' second cousin twice-removed in The Last of the Mohicans.




back to top
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.