Q2L 10 ELA discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
10C Weekly Discussion Threads
>
10C Week 8 Discussion
date
newest »






The subject is kind of spooky – Wren resurrects her boyfriend from the dead and keeps him hidden (since he is supposedly dead). My first problem was waiting for Wren to explain how she did it, which doesn't come for several chapters in the book, so I was confused for a little while in the beginning. Once Wren meets Gabriel, you’re entertained by their relationship from time to time – but that doesn't really happen the way you'd expect it either.
The overall tone of the book is quite smooth and passive , which is not what I was expecting at all because the story was meant to be spooky not accepting.Mainly because the book wasn't long i don't think i would read a sequel because the book was boring and couldn't keep my attention. the attention grabber was weak.even though the book wasn't great, I figured I would read to the end to give it a shot,and unfortunately not much changes by then.the book wasn't a racial factor because you couldn't tell if the main character was Caucasian or native american, but i believe it had a more of a cultural or economic factor because the book gives off a more spiritual idea.
I was not a fan of Cold Kiss. If I had gotten more background on Wren and her family, or more information between Gabriel and Wren it may have been a little better, but this is not a book i would recommend not a book I will be recommending over others.





This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
(Example: In Fahrenheit 451, there doesn't seem to be any obvious or outward poverty, and everyone seems to be equally middle class or something similar. Also, there is no mention of anyone's skin color, race, or ethnicity. Everyone seems to be white and straight. This doesn't fit with the idea of a large metropolis such as the one described in the book. It also doesn't seem reasonable that there should be no discussion about any economic pressures affecting this society beyond the general statement that "the rest of the world is poor and we're not." In this sense, the book seems to be a bit one-dimensional, unrealistic, and less than "quality," to use Faber's term.)