The Hobbit, or There and Back Again
discussion
Gandalf vs Dumbledore








Dumbledore, while powerful with a, as supposed, "unbeatable" wand (ironic since all its owners were defeated), is still a mere human who has been trained in the magical arts.
Gandalf, on the other hand, is of supernatural origins (The Maiar), with organically metaphysical attributes (The Istari).
Now, the magic of Harry Potter is essentially the magic of Arthurian Legend (hence the name "Order of Merlyn" thrown around so much). And since, according to some legends, that magic is of supernatural origin (Avalon) as well, it might put Dumbledore on par with Gandalf.
Personally, I doubt it. I have always regarded the magic of Arthurian Legend as undiscovered science. You can read "A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court" to get the jist of what I mean. In the book, "The Once and Future King", Merlyn was said to have unrecognizable objects hanging from the ceiling, but we'd recognize these objects as modern inventions, like airplanes and trains. That is because, as supposed, Merlyn lived backwards, from future to the past. The science he brought back from the future to Arthur's time is perceived as magic.
It just makes sense to me, more than the "Avalon" sources for Merlyn's powers.
This is actually seen rather prominently in Harry Potter. Remember Hermione's bag with the extension charm on it enabling it to contain more than it's physical constraints would otherwise be able to allow? Think that's impossible?
I walk around town with over 1,000 books on my person, in my pocket or in one hand, at any given moment. How? My Kindle.
Magic is merely undiscovered science. That is why I chuckle when, in the TDH movie, you hear a ton of books fall over when Hermione opens her bag to get clothes.
Back on point, however, I have always pictured Gandalf and Dumbledore as kindred spirits, and is more likely to be seen guffawing over butterbeers at the Three Broomsticks, or maybe pints of ale at the Prancing Pony, pontificating about the nature and methodology of fireworks or knitting patterns, than engaging in battle.
Hey, it could happen.
The magic of each world is different so you can't really compare... But I have yet to read The Return of the King, so my opinion might not be valid...


Um, Frodo and Harry might rip them apart before the end though.
But yeah. UNBEATABLE ELDER WAND? UNBEATABLE?



If the two worlds did collide... who would win? Dementors or Ringwraiths?


On the "Death cannot defeat Gandalf" thought, there is a suggestion in Unfinished Tales that Gandalf the White is not the same being as Gandalf the Grey (Hence his slight confusion about his name) However this is never fully suggested in narrative so since it was taken from notes is probably moot anyway.

On the "Death cannot defeat Gandalf" thought, there is a suggestion in Unfinished Tales that Gandalf the White is not the sa..."
Yeah Gandalf the Grey and Gandalf the White are like two different personailites of him[thats what i think] and GG is more.....talkitive and like some kind of joke and not always seriouse 247. where as GW is like.....serious 247[i haven't gotten the books yet this is all from what my friends have told me] and GG is quirky, where as GW isn't quirky

Yes but instead of Snape being the one to kill Dumbledore it was Malfoi. Snape said the words to the killing curse, but the spell didn't come out of Snape's wand. It came out of Malfoi's wand. So technially Dumbledore was brought low by Malfoi, not Snape. And Harry easily defeated Malfoi in a duel, thus how he then became the owner of the elder wand. The only thing about DUmbledore's death was, he knew he was going to die because he asked SNape to kill him. It probably surprised him a tiny bit of how his death actually happened, and when Snape said the spell and Malfoi killed Dumbledore, DUmbledore could have easily deflected or dodged it or made it stop. But he let it come. So really, in a way, Dumbledore was never brought low.

Of course it should be noted the seriousness of the situations. Gandalf the Grey was quite serious in the tale that ran parallel to the Hobbit in the Samirilion (SP) due to the nature of the story (which explained why Gandalf ran off so much in the Hobbit, note it is part of the movie as well). But overall the Hobbit was much more whimsical (As it was written for a different audience, but is still just as good as LOTR IMO). Gandalf the Grey also became quite serious in Fellowship as the stakes were much greater.

Now that is a matchup. Ringwraiths cannot be killed, since they are already dead. We do not know whether Dementors are mortal. They are, according to Wikipedia, phantoms. We know the Ministry limited their number at a certain point, but we are not told how this was done, nor do we know if it could be done by a Ringwraith.
A Dementor's only weapon is that happiness sucking thing they do. Since it is doubtful that Ringwraiths have no happiness to forfeit, it is doubtful that would have any effect on Ringwraiths.
We also do not know if swords, maces, or any of the weapons of a Ringwraith would have any effect on a Dementor.
Percy Jackson v. Harry Potter. Harry is powerful, but against a demigod... I don't know. I like Harry better, but a true demigod is really too powerful.
Another matchup... Aslan v. Sauron... Sauron's toast, and then Aslan would toast Melkor (or Morgoth) just for fun. Toast, toast, toast.





You can draw many parallels between HP and LOTR, there's a joke picture on the internet that shows many of them and joking has JKR saying "No one will notice."
I think the influence is quite strong for JKR from Hobbit/LOTR, but I'll also say she took many of those aspects and made them her own, nothing wrong with that, writers to it all the time (Myself included) and it works on many levels if done correctly and not a direct cut and paste process.

Smeagol....i'm prety sure he's a dragon.......

true


Gandolf, but I have no reason why they would fight.

Uh, he's like Gandalfs dubble ganger, and he is the strongest wizard in the harry potter series and has the strongest wand ever and is a master at spell weaving

Dumbledore was killed in a fall from a tower.
Gandalf survived a tumble down a bottomless pit while fighting (and defeating) the Balrog.
Simple.


well if i hadn't read your commet every where and if i was with you i would gasp, give you a look, or i might smack your arm. HE WAS SAVING HIS FRIENDS!

I think Smeagol would slap Moldy Voldy around, until Voldy had Nagini come and protect him.


The phrase was "Fly, you fools!"

(if it is a fight to the death)I think that they would fight and fight until they both drop dead.
Gandalf all the way.
And I'll stop here because I'd give a tedious, nerdy explanation, but that would take a long time, so here's my answer.
Gandalf.
Hands down.
And I'll stop here because I'd give a tedious, nerdy explanation, but that would take a long time, so here's my answer.
Gandalf.
Hands down.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Fire Light (other topics)
The Hobbit, or There and Back Again (other topics)
Terry Brooks (other topics)
J.K. Rowling (other topics)
Jim Butcher (other topics)
J. Abram Barneck (other topics)
More...
Books mentioned in this topic
Fire Light (other topics)Fire Light (other topics)
The Hobbit, or There and Back Again (other topics)
Authors mentioned in this topic
J.R.R. Tolkien (other topics)Terry Brooks (other topics)
J.K. Rowling (other topics)
Jim Butcher (other topics)
J. Abram Barneck (other topics)
More...
I say Gandalf. Now before you go off and tell me how Dumbledore is much more personal and how Gandalf is missing for large hunks of the seriees, blah blah blah, hear me out. I'm saying this from a logical standpoint. Gandalf is so ridiculously powerful that even death can't defeat him. He is thrown from the face of a mountain while fighting a Balrog, but he comes back, even more powerful than before. Granted, he does have his own personal motives and is very spacey throughout the story, but he simply just have to show up and snap his fingers and he saves everybody from certain death. Dumbledore may be more, pure at heart, so to say, but he is not nearly as powerful. He's much more involved, but my point is Gandalf doesn't even half to be involved and he still is the most powerful force in the War of the Ring.
I always imagined that if they had a duel, Gandalf would kill Dumbledore then stand over him looking puzzled and then say, "But why aren't you resurrecting????!!!"