Atlas Shrugged
discussion
What effect did this book have on you??
message 1:
by
Sharmishtha
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Feb 01, 2013 01:55AM

reply
|
flag
The best part is Hugh Akston flipping hamburgers. We can do whatever we want to.

The fact that he was also excellent at making burgers shows something that I've always believed. Competence is competence. Those that are very good at their jobs aren't necessarily playing to their skill set. They are competent people that would be great in any number of job situations. And then there is everyone else.




The fact that he was also excellent at making burgers shows something that I've always believed. ..."
To do what has to be done no matter what it is to reach your desired end.


It's a great book but I do think as others that some parts droned on needlessly. But all in all was a pretty good depiction of the two frameworks.









The book gave me strength to...stay the course. I was always a straight A student, overweight, and apparently intimidated people (specially boys) because of the way I spoke. The book gave me the green-light to be the assertive woman that came naturally instead of pretending to fit-in or try to conform. While I didn't know this until years later, it prevented me from being bullied because I was so confident. I also realized that competition exists and I can either participate or not.
The two bad things that resulted from reading the book at such a young age were: 1) I became a smoker on and off my whole life [nicotine-free for a year] and 2) it took me years to learn compassion since I grew up with a "life of mind" and was somewhat a "cold" woman.
Luckily, I did learn compassion because I knew enough to surround myself with people who complemented me and taught me what I could not learn from books. I am incredibly good at what I do and I don't have to apologize for it. (What a relief.)
===As an adult, I realize that only honorable competition is worthy of my time.
===As an adult, I value relationships because they come with better stories than fiction.
===As an adult, I look at Atlas Shrugged lovingly:
It is SUPPOSED to be controversial.After all...It is SUPPOSED to be: fiction.
It is SUPPOSED to be black & white.
It is SUPPOSED to be provocative.

I didn't care much for the romance and no doubt many of the points in Atlas Shrugged were taken beyond reality. However much of it holds true. For those who have ever dealt with government officials or others in protected positions this book rings very true.
I actually don't think everyone is replaceable, or perhaps more accurately- some positions require the right person. Not everyone can or should be a brain surgeon, yet nearly everyone could be a parking meter reader. Economies and countries that allow positions to be filled with the less competent will not perform at the same level as they might have otherwise.
For me much of the book is about the simple truth of human nature. Where is the book that takes the opposite position of Atlas Shrugged? A world where humans toil away with no regard for compensation or achievement, where government strikes the perfect balance between industry and society- such a book would indeed be the ultimate piece of fiction.
For those more interested in a pure analysis, "The Road to Serfdom," more than delivers.

Funny, I thought John Galt's "diatribe" was the best part of the book.
;-)"


― Frédéric Bastiat


Vonnegut gets there faster, tonally HB is WAY less annoying and in a SF short story you're allowed to grind home an ideological point. HB is more nuanced, funny and thoughtful too. Atlas Shrugged is just a Harlequin romance with narcissism as the object of affection. Wouldn't it be marketed as a YA novel if it came out today? People I've met that love the book 1) don't read a whole lot or 2) use it as a justification for being a shithead. Sometimes both.




We the Living was chilling and Anthem was a pretty nifty eye-opener as well. I read Atlas Shrugged because someone kept throwing it in my face to ridicule it. I'm glad I did. You're right though, knowing a bit about Ayn Rand does add substance to her works.


I agree with this assessment to a degree. But I beleive it all comes down to Rands objective in writing her book(s). Was she trying to entertain? No. She was trying to create a story to showcase her Objectivist philosophy. Like Heartbreak House by George Bernard Shaw, each character represents some aspect of the overall meaning that she was trying to convey. In this context her characters did exactly what she intended them to. As for the legnth, I too felt that it was, at times, laboriously overextended and long winded. But I have to wonder if it was deliberate?


Err...I believe thats what I said, here and in other places on Goodreads. Preaching to the chior when it comes to me.

Perhaps not in a hidden location, but seriously, why couldn't a group of some of the smartest minds unite to create a utopia?


all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Six Pillars of Self-Esteem (other topics)
Honoring the Self: Self-Esteem and Personal Transformation (other topics)
The 10000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution (other topics)
The 10000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution (other topics)
More...
Books mentioned in this topic
Unrugged Individualism: The Selfish Basis of Benevolence (other topics)Six Pillars of Self-Esteem (other topics)
Honoring the Self: Self-Esteem and Personal Transformation (other topics)
The 10000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution (other topics)
The 10000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution (other topics)
More...