Wild Things: YA Grown-Up discussion
Fantasy/Sci-Fi
>
Dystopian/Post-Apocalyptic
message 51:
by
Ashley
(new)
Jun 03, 2009 09:49AM

reply
|
flag

My biggest fear, is not them encountering something inappropriate, because they are great at asking questions, and we can talk very openly about almost anything. What upsets me more, and I see it more, now that I read comments on GRs, is kids being pushed towards books they just can't understand or grasp. Most 12 year olds don't really care about sex/love stories.
They end up reading them, and often, hating them. That's such a waste in my opinion.
Animal Farm isn't explicit, but it IS satire, and I do think it's above the typical 6th grader's understanding. What a tragedy for them to read it, not understand, be bored, and end up hating such an enlightening book.


I think they will one day because the YA market has become a lot more popular and the line between YA/adul..."
There basically is a split. After childrens (which has easy readers and all that), there comes Juvenile, then YA. So must young teens are still in the j section, while most YA is targeted at around 14-15 and up. Not that younger readers don't make their way over. I was reading YA and Adult when I was 12...
Alexis (gorgeous library, by the way), I think you are right about Peeps. It's a bit more graphic, but never too pushy. As for AF in 6th grade, whether it's graphic or too mature, I don't know, but I don't see how 11 and 12 year olds would get it.
I recently came across a post on Amazon from a teacher asking what people thought about teaching
The Giver to a class of 10 year olds. Responses were very varied.
Back to random dystopic fiction, I am reading The Knife of Never Letting Go, and though the quasi-stream-of-consciousness sometimes irritates me (mor efor repeition than anything, cause the style actually suits the story), I am finding it really interesting and though-provoking. Since I am not finished, I can't say whether anything that happens is inappropriate, but so far it seems well suited to the age group.

Don't worry, Kandice, you're coming across as a good mom who is involved in her kids' lives. :) That's totally right.
I think the main issue is "what is YA?" Not by age, but by content, because of course all kids are different. I was in an accelerated class, so we always ended up reading things that were above our age level. Some we liked, some we didn't, but I don't recall comprehension ever being an issue. My friend read The Giver in 4th grade and loved it. I wish I had. I didn't discover it until a few years ago.
Content-wise, I would consider YA probably closer to 14 and up. Maybe 13. Misty is right, there is a division - after beginning readers, there is Young Readers/Juvenile/Middle Grade. Then there is YA/Teen. Of course kids will move outside of the recommended age groups based on ability and comprehension.
However, from working in B&N, a lot of 12 year old girls do seem to be interested in reading love stories. Or they're reading awful stuff like Gossip Girl and the Clique series.

It's definitely apocalyptic, though!


I love that you read what they read. I have young kids 4, 2, and 0 so I'm reading to them not with them, but I'll have to remember your idea when they start school.

With the power, control, and corruption of pharmaceutical companies I could see this as a true reality some day. They would like nothing better than to have a drug that everyone in the world has to take for the rest of their lives.

Dan, enjoy reading to and with your kids! You won't be sorry! :)

This is the key to good dystopian fiction to me. If there is that chance that it could be real, if there is some mirror of our society, then that adds a great creepy factor.

Amen!





I think it depends on your definition of dystopian. The way I look at it, dystopian novels need some sort of government, or structure that is trying to create the perfect utopia, and uses various negative methods to obtain it, and the very nature of their atempt to create this utopia is what causes the dystopia; think Uglies, 1984, Fahrenheit 451, The Giver/Gathering Blue, etc... However, a post-apocalyptic novel deals with the end of the world, or civilization as we know it. Think The Road, The War of the Worlds etc.
The two genres do overlap a lot. Often a government or faction will use an apocalyptic event to alter and control the society, so the post apocalyptic setting is a dystopian world, but it doesn't have to be that way. Sometimes the two can be linked together, but other times, they are two seperate things entirely.

The only thing that I would differ with you on is that I don't think that the government (or whoever) necessarily is controlling things to make them a utopia. More often I think that they are controlling things for the sheer power of it. Although maybe that makes it a utoia for themselves. LOL
Other than that though, I think yours is the best description of dystopia I've seen. :)


Also, I feel like I need to just read a really good dystopia.


I have a few that are sitting around the house, it's just a matter of getting around to reading them. My next dystopia is going to be : The House of the Scorpion by Nancy Farmer, The Knife of Never Letting Go, Brave New World, or Catching Fire.



I have a few that are sitting around the house, it's just a matter of getting ar..."
Knife of Never Letting Go was excellent as was The Maze Runner, and Catching Fire.
I have not read the other two though...

(Actually, just kidding, I'd rather have great potential books to read, than terrible potential books)




I think you should go with whichever you are feeling most; you should have fun with this. But if you want to brave a reread, that's very admirable, and we often love the things we hated when they were required...

The idea behind the book is that you are allowed to 'unwind' your children between ages 13 and 18. An unwinding takes the person apart- literally. New technology allows every single part and piece to a person's body to be reused and recycled to save or improve someone else's life.
I definitely recommend it.

The idea behind the book is that you are al..."
LOVE LOVE LOVE Unwind!! Very thought provoking. I started an individual thread for it under Fantasy/Sci-Fi for it because I liked it so much. Feel free to add your two cents there, too!!

BTW. I currently teach Life As We Knew It and The Dead and The Gone. I like them both very much and they are well received by students. However, I was disappointed with This World We Live In. I don’t know about anyone else….


Uglies is a really interesting book, and maybe one that your students would especially enjoy because it deals with people being "different" and how it's okay to be yourself. Definitely not racy, and I don't recall any foul language.
The Hunger Games is another pretty great action packed, good for guys or girls, dystopian book. I'd recommend it too.
Unwind is also pretty clean from what I remember and is absolutely a discussion starter. My 14 year old read it and liked it as much as I did. (He's an advanced reader.)
I haven't read Little Brother, so I am not sure how well any of these would pair up with it, but still great books!




IIRC, it's very 'clean', so suitable for YA and not nearly as heavy-handed about her philosophy as her more famous (and huge) other books. It is much more of an 'action' story than many of the other classics of the genre, and relatively short - my copy of just the text is only about 125 pages - a good length for school reading, I think.
Anthem is similar to 1984, in that it takes place well into an established dystopian society and is about one man's struggle for individuality and personal freedom. You could say that Little Brother is a precursor to the kind of society found in Anthem.
Anyways, it is one of my favorite books of all time, and I read it on my own as a teen. My mom was taking college courses and she had to read Anthem, Lord of the Flies and some other books for the course. I of course saw them and appropriated them when she was done with them.

Sorry for the etymological squiggling!
Also - "Children of the Dust"! Thank you so much whoever mentioned that! I read that so long ago and had forgotten it but I LOVED it! Now I can find it again. Sorry for the many exclamation marks, just couldn't contain my excitement...

I could be very wrong about this, but my understanding of the words is more that 'no place' is what the word originally referred to/meant, but after Sir Thomas Moore published his book Utopia, people began to use the word differently. It seems to happen quite often, where people will take a word and overtime it comes to mean something else. Like the term gay... (I know, I'm sorry... It's the only word I can think of right off...) It originally meant happy, then it meant homosexual, and when I was younger, people used it almost completely interchangeablly with stupid.
Society has 'changed' the meaning of a utopia to mean a good or perfect place instead of a no place, and that is when dystopia is the opposite. Although ya, technically, going by definitions alone, it is more of a sub-genre... At least, that's the way I see it.
message 98:
by
St[♥]r Pr!nc:$$ N[♥]wsheen pictures, pictures, pictures
(last edited Apr 20, 2010 11:29AM)
(new)
![St[♥]r Pr!nc:$$ N[♥]wsheen pictures, pictures, pictures ||| ♥ Zin Uru ♥ ||||](https://images.gr-assets.com/users/1378104145p1/1253494.jpg)
I watched like three dystopic movies all at once and got interested in the topic again

message 100:
by
St[♥]r Pr!nc:$$ N[♥]wsheen pictures, pictures, pictures
(last edited Apr 21, 2010 02:21PM)
(new)
![St[♥]r Pr!nc:$$ N[♥]wsheen pictures, pictures, pictures ||| ♥ Zin Uru ♥ ||||](https://images.gr-assets.com/users/1378104145p1/1253494.jpg)
Books mentioned in this topic
After the Snow (other topics)Blood Red Road (other topics)
XVI (other topics)
XVI (other topics)
Little Brother (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
S.D. Crockett (other topics)Allegra Goodman (other topics)
Margaret Peterson Haddix (other topics)
Brian Keaney (other topics)
Lois Lowry (other topics)
More...