High Strangeness Books
Showing 1-50 of 647

by (shelved 17 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.22 — 1,396 ratings — published 1969

by (shelved 15 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.51 — 6,827 ratings — published 1975

by (shelved 14 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.52 — 7,814 ratings — published 1987

by (shelved 10 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.84 — 3,792 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 10 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.90 — 682 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 8 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.21 — 824 ratings — published 1988

by (shelved 7 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.34 — 330 ratings — published 1991

by (shelved 7 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.60 — 446 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 7 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.02 — 2,750 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 7 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.86 — 540 ratings — published 1971

by (shelved 7 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.24 — 646 ratings — published 1970

by (shelved 7 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.31 — 423 ratings — published 1990

by (shelved 6 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.07 — 1,748 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 6 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.33 — 244 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 6 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.07 — 389 ratings — published 1895

by (shelved 6 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.23 — 100 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 6 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.75 — 1,220 ratings — published 1815

by (shelved 6 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.89 — 272 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 5 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.28 — 2,122 ratings — published

by (shelved 5 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.17 — 421 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 5 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.91 — 3,003 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 5 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.87 — 39 ratings — published 1983

by (shelved 5 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.25 — 208 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 5 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.82 — 343 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 5 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.22 — 399 ratings — published 1979

by (shelved 4 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.99 — 310 ratings — published 1978

by (shelved 4 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.83 — 138 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 4 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.11 — 669 ratings — published 1975

by (shelved 4 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.88 — 2,524 ratings — published 2022

by (shelved 4 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.04 — 1,672 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 4 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.29 — 6,375 ratings — published 1928

by (shelved 4 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.66 — 1,826 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 4 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.26 — 47 ratings — published

by (shelved 4 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.01 — 195 ratings — published 1905

by (shelved 4 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.76 — 82 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 4 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.89 — 549 ratings — published 1987

by (shelved 3 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.98 — 7,241 ratings — published 2024

by (shelved 3 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.02 — 367 ratings — published 1981

by (shelved 3 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.86 — 10,591 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 3 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.40 — 152 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 3 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.82 — 3,123 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 3 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.87 — 324 ratings — published 1977

by (shelved 3 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.08 — 4,422 ratings — published 1971

by (shelved 3 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.29 — 4,954 ratings — published 2022

by (shelved 3 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.73 — 33 ratings — published

by (shelved 3 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.32 — 34 ratings — published

by (shelved 3 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.09 — 54 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 3 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.00 — 8 ratings — published

by (shelved 3 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 3.99 — 137 ratings — published

by (shelved 3 times as high-strangeness)
avg rating 4.04 — 28 ratings — published 1998

“One of the greater problems that I see within modern UFO circles and in particular those “nuts and bolts” investigators who subscribe to the ETH or extraterrestrial hypothesis as the default explanation for cases they cannot explain is the absolute dismissal of high strangeness reports. Terms like “woo woo” to describe witnesses are freely bantered about in online UFO forums, and social media including by those UFO researchers who proclaim they are taking a more scientific or neutral look at UFO events.”
― UFOs: Reframing the Debate
― UFOs: Reframing the Debate