127 books
—
38 voters
Fractal Books
Showing 1-50 of 71

by (shelved 2 times as fractal)
avg rating 4.10 — 10 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 2 times as fractal)
avg rating 4.23 — 1,281 ratings — published 1977

by (shelved 2 times as fractal)
avg rating 3.91 — 829 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 2 times as fractal)
avg rating 3.89 — 54 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 2 times as fractal)
avg rating 3.60 — 5 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 2 times as fractal)
avg rating 4.26 — 50 ratings — published 1990

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 3.84 — 73 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 3.00 — 5 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 4.11 — 9 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 3.27 — 1,338 ratings — published 1926

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 4.40 — 538 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 3.67 — 63 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 4.50 — 2 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 4.67 — 3 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 4.02 — 6,060 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 4.23 — 1,256 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 3.69 — 16 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 3.79 — 62,377 ratings — published 1936

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 4.02 — 115,704 ratings — published 1928

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 3.47 — 19 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 3.64 — 88 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 4.24 — 3,096,012 ratings — published 1950

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 3.93 — 45 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 3.57 — 196 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 3.49 — 3,108 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 4.20 — 5 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 3.08 — 13 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 3.63 — 131 ratings — published 1962

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 3.88 — 10,000 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 3.92 — 169,144 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 1.00 — 1 rating — published

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 4.13 — 1,034,256 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 3.76 — 20,654 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 4.14 — 106 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 3.84 — 10,502 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 4.08 — 518 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 4.37 — 268 ratings — published 1998

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 4.56 — 16 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 3.78 — 32 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 4.00 — 299 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 4.00 — 5 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 4.36 — 14 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 3.94 — 435 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 4.10 — 29 ratings — published 1991

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 3.91 — 11 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 3.82 — 142 ratings — published 1975

by (shelved 1 time as fractal)
avg rating 4.07 — 45 ratings — published 2004

“Meanwhile, people are busy using fractals to explain any system that has defied other, more reductionist approaches. Since they were successfully applied by IBM's Benoit Mandlebrot to the problem of seemingly random, intermittent interference on the phone lines, fractals have been used to identify underlying patterns in weather systems, computer files, and bacteria cultures. Sometimes fractal enthusiasts go a bit too far, however, using these nonlinear equations to mine for patterns in systems where none exist. Applied to the stock market to consumer behavior, fractals may tell less about those systems than about the people searching for patterns within them.
There is a dual nature to fractals: They orient us while at the same time challenging our sense of scale and appropriateness. They offer us access to the underlying patterns of complex systems while at the same time tempting us to look for patterns where none exist. This makes them a terrific icon for the sort of pattern recognition associated with present shock—a syndrome we'll call factalnoia. Like the robots on Mystery Science Theater 3000, we engage by relating one thing to another, even when the relationship is forced or imagined. The tsunami makes sense once it is connected to chemtrails, which make sense when they are connected to HAARP.
It's not just conspiracy theorists drawing fractalnoid connections between things. In a world without time, any and all sense making must occur on the fly. Simultaneity often seems like all we have. That's why anyone contending with present shock will have a propensity to make connections between things happening in the same moment—as if there had to be an underlying logic.”
― Present Shock: When Everything Happens Now
There is a dual nature to fractals: They orient us while at the same time challenging our sense of scale and appropriateness. They offer us access to the underlying patterns of complex systems while at the same time tempting us to look for patterns where none exist. This makes them a terrific icon for the sort of pattern recognition associated with present shock—a syndrome we'll call factalnoia. Like the robots on Mystery Science Theater 3000, we engage by relating one thing to another, even when the relationship is forced or imagined. The tsunami makes sense once it is connected to chemtrails, which make sense when they are connected to HAARP.
It's not just conspiracy theorists drawing fractalnoid connections between things. In a world without time, any and all sense making must occur on the fly. Simultaneity often seems like all we have. That's why anyone contending with present shock will have a propensity to make connections between things happening in the same moment—as if there had to be an underlying logic.”
― Present Shock: When Everything Happens Now

“Engineers had not framework for understanding Mandelbrot's description, but mathematicians did. In effect, Mandelbrot was duplicating an abstract construction known as the Cantor set, after the nineteenth-century mathematician Georg Cantor. To make a Cantor set, you start with the interval of numbers from zero to one, represented by a line segment. Then you remove the middle third. That leaves two segments, and you remove the middle third of each (from one-ninth to two-ninths and from seven-ninths to eight-ninths). That leaves four segments, and you remove the middle third of each- and so on to infinity. What remains? A strange "dust" of points, arranged in clusters, infinitely many yet infinitely sparse. Mandelbrot was thinking of transmission errors as a Cantor set arranged in time.”
― Chaos: Making a New Science
― Chaos: Making a New Science