102 books
—
38 voters
Episcopal Books
Showing 1-50 of 207

by (shelved 7 times as episcopal)
avg rating 4.45 — 2,367 ratings — published 1979

by (shelved 4 times as episcopal)
avg rating 4.33 — 18,254 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 3 times as episcopal)
avg rating 4.46 — 487 ratings — published

by (shelved 3 times as episcopal)
avg rating 4.34 — 9,160 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 3 times as episcopal)
avg rating 4.00 — 435 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 3 times as episcopal)
avg rating 4.06 — 167 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 2 times as episcopal)
avg rating 4.39 — 5,359 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 2 times as episcopal)
avg rating 4.48 — 2,748 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 2 times as episcopal)
avg rating 4.37 — 161 ratings — published

by (shelved 2 times as episcopal)
avg rating 3.85 — 39 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 2 times as episcopal)
avg rating 4.31 — 15,397 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 2 times as episcopal)
avg rating 4.32 — 440 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 2 times as episcopal)
avg rating 4.05 — 140 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 2 times as episcopal)
avg rating 4.40 — 15,418 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 2 times as episcopal)
avg rating 4.59 — 22 ratings — published 1983

by (shelved 2 times as episcopal)
avg rating 3.91 — 129 ratings — published 1991

by (shelved 2 times as episcopal)
avg rating 4.00 — 134 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 2 times as episcopal)
avg rating 3.81 — 1,270 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 2 times as episcopal)
avg rating 4.00 — 5,411 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 2 times as episcopal)
avg rating 4.32 — 20,990 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 2 times as episcopal)
avg rating 4.27 — 17,081 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 2 times as episcopal)
avg rating 4.13 — 68,815 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 2 times as episcopal)
avg rating 4.21 — 17,039 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 3.93 — 28 ratings — published 1981

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 4.10 — 566 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 4.47 — 503 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 4.11 — 76 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 4.34 — 1,955 ratings — published 1992

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 4.13 — 479 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 3.95 — 4,951 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 4.17 — 450 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 4.32 — 985 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 4.18 — 152 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 4.70 — 10 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 4.33 — 93 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 4.46 — 48 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 4.50 — 564 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 3.86 — 7 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 4.03 — 9,256 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 4.47 — 594 ratings — published 1998

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 3.50 — 2 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 4.50 — 108 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 4.49 — 199 ratings — published 1928

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 4.31 — 1,606 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 4.34 — 134 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 3.98 — 694 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 4.00 — 36 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 4.70 — 23 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as episcopal)
avg rating 3.58 — 1,599 ratings — published 1668

“...The Presidential election has given me less anxiety than I myself could have imagined. The next administration will be a troublesome one, to whomsoever it falls, and our John has been too much worn to contend much longer with conflicting factions. I call him our John, because, when you were at the Cul de sac at Paris, he appeared to me to be almost as much your boy as mine.
...As to the decision of your author, though I wish to see the book {Flourens’s Experiments on the functions of the nervous system in vertebrated animals}, I look upon it as a mere game at push-pin. Incision-knives will never discover the distinction between matter and spirit, or whether there is any or not. That there is an active principle of power in the universe, is apparent; but in what substance that active principle resides, is past our investigation. The faculties of our understanding are not adequate to penetrate the universe. Let us do our duty, which is to do as we would be done by; and that, one would think, could not be difficult, if we honestly aim at it.
Your university is a noble employment in your old age, and your ardor for its success does you honor; but I do not approve of your sending to Europe for tutors and professors. I do believe there are sufficient scholars in America, to fill your professorships and tutorships with more active ingenuity and independent minds than you can bring from Europe. The Europeans are all deeply tainted with prejudices, both ecclesiastical and temporal, which they can never get rid of. They are all infected with episcopal and presbyterian creeds, and confessions of faith. They all believe that great Principle which has produced this boundless universe, Newton’s universe and Herschel’s universe, came down to this little ball, to be spit upon by Jews. And until this awful blasphemy is got rid of, there never will be any liberal science in the world.
I salute your fireside with best wishes and best affections for their health, wealth and prosperity.
{Letter to Thomas Jefferson, 22 January, 1825}”
― The Adams-Jefferson Letters: The Complete Correspondence Between Thomas Jefferson & Abigail & John Adams
...As to the decision of your author, though I wish to see the book {Flourens’s Experiments on the functions of the nervous system in vertebrated animals}, I look upon it as a mere game at push-pin. Incision-knives will never discover the distinction between matter and spirit, or whether there is any or not. That there is an active principle of power in the universe, is apparent; but in what substance that active principle resides, is past our investigation. The faculties of our understanding are not adequate to penetrate the universe. Let us do our duty, which is to do as we would be done by; and that, one would think, could not be difficult, if we honestly aim at it.
Your university is a noble employment in your old age, and your ardor for its success does you honor; but I do not approve of your sending to Europe for tutors and professors. I do believe there are sufficient scholars in America, to fill your professorships and tutorships with more active ingenuity and independent minds than you can bring from Europe. The Europeans are all deeply tainted with prejudices, both ecclesiastical and temporal, which they can never get rid of. They are all infected with episcopal and presbyterian creeds, and confessions of faith. They all believe that great Principle which has produced this boundless universe, Newton’s universe and Herschel’s universe, came down to this little ball, to be spit upon by Jews. And until this awful blasphemy is got rid of, there never will be any liberal science in the world.
I salute your fireside with best wishes and best affections for their health, wealth and prosperity.
{Letter to Thomas Jefferson, 22 January, 1825}”
― The Adams-Jefferson Letters: The Complete Correspondence Between Thomas Jefferson & Abigail & John Adams