Robbi Holman
asked
Lois McMaster Bujold:
I have a small readership of some very narrow work (callback to our discussion of Mark & Kareen), and some of my readers are very pushy. Sometimes they try to bully me into making my characters become a certain way or do certain things. Does anyone ever try to get into your head to try to direct your characters and if so, do you ignore them or think about what they've asked/demanded?
Lois McMaster Bujold
Well, I always listen to commentary with interest, because it's a source of endless fascination to me the wildly varied ways people read and process the same text. But that's just a kind of mildly masochistic self-indulgence. Otherwise, I pretty much ignore them. My story, my characters; if they want to be in charge, they can write their own. If they want someone to take dictation, they can hire a stenographer.
Exceptions are readers with technical expertise in some element that has come up in the story -- medicine, for example -- who can give me advice or ideas or prevent me from making gaffes in matters of fact. Technical expertise can extend to certain characterization issues sometimes, so as almost always in writing, the boundaries are fuzzy and the true answer is, It Depends.
Note that there is also a difference between solicited critique, before a work is published with the explicit goal of test-driving it and uncovering flaws, and later commentary, after it's entirely too late to change anything and anyway the writer has already moved on to the next project. (If writers treat the latter with the same attention as the former, they will drive themselves crazy.)
Ta, L.
Exceptions are readers with technical expertise in some element that has come up in the story -- medicine, for example -- who can give me advice or ideas or prevent me from making gaffes in matters of fact. Technical expertise can extend to certain characterization issues sometimes, so as almost always in writing, the boundaries are fuzzy and the true answer is, It Depends.
Note that there is also a difference between solicited critique, before a work is published with the explicit goal of test-driving it and uncovering flaws, and later commentary, after it's entirely too late to change anything and anyway the writer has already moved on to the next project. (If writers treat the latter with the same attention as the former, they will drive themselves crazy.)
Ta, L.
More Answered Questions
Pax Oncel
asked
Lois McMaster Bujold:
(but I think by saying you weren’t sure what Moravian meant you already answered my question. Sorry! I just could not stop thinking about a planet that seems very Christian in their makeup and yet were so radically socially progressive about gender and sex, and the herm population always made me think of them. question mark to satisfy the ask-field-robot)?
Sybal Janssen
asked
Lois McMaster Bujold:
Finished "The Hallowed Haunt" today and am starting to reread it. Your Five Deity theology fascinates me. I was particularly taken with the idea the thumb, which represents The Bastard God touches all five fingers. Did you develop this theology completely from your own creative imagination, or was it a partial not to the five elements of the Ancient Chinese world view? Much else of your theology delighted me.
greenlady
asked
Lois McMaster Bujold:
I was pre-ordering "Gentleman Jole and the Red Queen" and discovered I had somehow missed a new novella. What a wonderful treat! Are you planning to release more short works? It's a different type of story telling and I'd love to see more of it. I'd think that Aral and Cordelia's time on Sergyar would be a great place to explore via short stories and novellas.
About Goodreads Q&A
Ask and answer questions about books!
You can pose questions to the Goodreads community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.
See Featured Authors Answering Questions
Learn more




