Jillian Chamberlin
asked:
I read this two days ago and keep going back and forth on it. Does anyone else think there needed to be another explanatory chapter to tie up loose ends? For example, the whole point of the book was about perception and the lack of evidence, but with a bloody murder, and Anna pointed out Elise fought back, how would the killer not have gotten blood on them/their clothes. What was that confrontation like?
To answer questions about
Dangerous Girls,
please sign up.
Wahidah
I don't think Anna confronted them in the act but waited until Elise was alone and probably killed her. I personally don't think Anna is a sociopath or a psychopath like that Martin said and the media had declared her guilty so saying otherwise would be career suicide for him meaning his opinion was biased. I am not defending what she did but the fact is she was neither a psychopath or a sociopath but she was a cold-blooded killer. She seemed to feel bad about Elise's death but not about killing her if that makes sense.
Katy
The only reason I can think about is Anna is a very good psychopath. (I'M SERIOUS!) I realize it now, the Martin guy Clara Rose invited on the set. All the things that he said didn't fit when we still didn't know who the killer was, but now it made sense. It now fit Anna,
About Goodreads Q&A
Ask and answer questions about books!
You can pose questions to the Goodreads community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.
See Featured Authors Answering Questions
Learn more