ClitLit Book Reviews
asked
Gail Carriger:
I appreciate how you've flipped the traditional "cat and mouse" narrative, turning the natural predator from pursuer to prey. What inspired you to write about "unladylike" ladies in a restrictive society owning their autonomy and individuality? Your heroines are charming because of those qualities, and much of your character development seems focused on that aspect.
Gail Carriger
Ooo, what a complicated question. Well I'm very interested in activating the beats of a Heroine's Journey (as opposed to a Hero's) and that, by it's very nature, flips some of these narrative expectations in terms of the perception of autonomy/individuality.
I also very much like to play with social, cultural, and reader expectations (but in a nice way). I guess you might call it my version of parody. (It helps that I write comedy.) It's a way to get a twist in without having to sacrifice plot. In other words, if I do "unexpected" with character, I can still have my happy endings and my loving friendships and my representation. In fact everything (and everyone) becomes more accepting because of their own abnormal quirks. I want to give the disenfranchised (and the geeky and the timid and the bullied and the silly and the queer) self-actualization, and possibility, and hope.
I might make a case that all authors are manipulative and Machiavellian. I like to believe I am particularly wicked about it, but doing it for good not evil.
I hope that makes sense and thank you for the question!
I also very much like to play with social, cultural, and reader expectations (but in a nice way). I guess you might call it my version of parody. (It helps that I write comedy.) It's a way to get a twist in without having to sacrifice plot. In other words, if I do "unexpected" with character, I can still have my happy endings and my loving friendships and my representation. In fact everything (and everyone) becomes more accepting because of their own abnormal quirks. I want to give the disenfranchised (and the geeky and the timid and the bullied and the silly and the queer) self-actualization, and possibility, and hope.
I might make a case that all authors are manipulative and Machiavellian. I like to believe I am particularly wicked about it, but doing it for good not evil.
I hope that makes sense and thank you for the question!
More Answered Questions
Stine
asked
Gail Carriger:
This question contains spoilers…
(view spoiler)[
Did Tunstell have excess soul? Or did he live longer than he would have if he had gone for the bite?
It's just that it was mentioned in Souless that he did seem to have "plenty" of soul, so then when he died he might have become a ghost.
(hide spoiler)]
It's just that it was mentioned in Souless that he did seem to have "plenty" of soul, so then when he died he might have become a ghost. (hide spoiler)]
Carson
asked
Gail Carriger:
Huge fan. Was there a particular source that introduced you to steampunk such as a book or film? My introduction to steampunk was reading the first Parasol Protectorates books by you. I'm interested to know how you decided to write this genre, which you do quite well. Thank you.
About Goodreads Q&A
Ask and answer questions about books!
You can pose questions to the Goodreads community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.
See Featured Authors Answering Questions
Learn more




