The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable (Incerto, #2)
Rate it:
Open Preview
76%
Flag icon
Beware moral hazard with bonus payments.
76%
Flag icon
On the other hand, research ventures show a less rosy past history. A biotech company (usually) faces positive uncertainty, while a bank faces almost exclusively negative shocks.
76%
Flag icon
Do not confuse absence of volatility with absence of risk.
76%
Flag icon
Beware presentations of risk numbers.
76%
Flag icon
Find the smart people
76%
Flag icon
whose hands are clean.
76%
Flag icon
Equity bubbles (as in 2000) have proved to be mild; debt bubbles are vicious.
77%
Flag icon
Only Ponzi schemes should depend on confidence. Governments should never need to “restore confidence.”
77%
Flag icon
Economic life should be definancialized. We should learn not to use markets as warehouses of value: they do not harbor the certainties that normal citizens can require, in spite of “expert” opinions.
77%
Flag icon
Citizens should experience anxiety from their own businesses (which they control), not
77%
Flag icon
from their investments (which they do...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
77%
Flag icon
if I gave you a nice house and a Lamborghini, put a million dollars in your bank account, and provided you with a social network, then, a few months later, took everything away, you would be much worse off than if nothing had happened in the first place.
77%
Flag icon
Seneca’s credibility as a moral philosopher (to me) came from the fact that, unlike other philosophers, he did not denigrate the value of wealth, ownership, and property because he was poor.
1 6 8 Next »