Kindred: Neanderthal Life, Love, Death and Art
Rate it:
Open Preview
Kindle Notes & Highlights
3%
Flag icon
450 to 400 thousand years ago (ka).
3%
Flag icon
north Wales across to the borders of China, and southwards to the fringes of Arabia’s deserts.
3%
Flag icon
1856.
3%
Flag icon
Homo neanderthalensis.
5%
Flag icon
1950s with radiocarbon,
5%
Flag icon
first recorded descriptions of a prehistoric stone tool comes from 1673, when a triangular-shaped artefact
5%
Flag icon
Les Eyzies-de-Tayac,
5%
Flag icon
prehistoric wonderland,
6%
Flag icon
mammoth tusk with markings on it. That very day,
6%
Flag icon
engraved lines formed the distinctive domed head of a mammoth,
6%
Flag icon
Close your eyes, shake off your shoes. Dulled solar redness glows beyond eyelids, grass prickles toes and dust lies beneath your soles. Warmth brushes your arm as a hand slips around yours; somehow you know who it is. Open your eyes, and below a sky both bright with sun and somehow star-speckled black, your mother stands before you. This is the place out of time, where all humans find each other. Rustling footfalls approach, and another woman steps forward: your maternal grandmother. Maybe you spoke to her last week, or twenty years ago, or maybe you only know her from blurred photos. She ...more
6%
Flag icon
CATHY C
Wow
7%
Flag icon
over 20 identified hominin species from just the last 3.5
7%
Flag icon
age of around 450 to 430 ka and anatomy that make them prime suspects for being true proto-Neanderthals, confirmed in 2016 by DNA analysis.
7%
Flag icon
many simultaneous pathways existed, some finishing in dead ends, others like Neanderthals developing their own unique bodies and minds
7%
Flag icon
among all the recent human evolution discoveries, perhaps the most startling for understanding the Neanderthals is that they could and did interbreed with us.
8%
Flag icon
thousands of fossils from many, many sites. They represent a couple of hundred individuals,
8%
Flag icon
Archaeology distinguishes between different parts or features of a site.
8%
Flag icon
assemblage,
8%
Flag icon
layers,
8%
Flag icon
stratigraphy.
8%
Flag icon
taphonomy,
9%
Flag icon
Only DNA can identify if children were female or male, but their age can be worked out from teeth and bones.
9%
Flag icon
apparently bigger brains are actually due to sex-biased samples:
10%
Flag icon
they absolutely walked as upright as us.
10%
Flag icon
Both we and they inherited some ancient features in common, but their lineage kept others we lost, while the reverse is also true.
10%
Flag icon
extreme athletes’ muscles over time can change their skeleton.
12%
Flag icon
initially their bones were mostly found in clearly glacial contexts,
13%
Flag icon
increased exercise makes not just the limbs of young animals more robust, but their whole bodies.
13%
Flag icon
most of the strength was in the upper arms,
16%
Flag icon
Such aggression in our own species, even between hunter-gatherers, is certainly well documented, and clearly accelerated over the past 40,000 years. In contrast, we see no such phenomenon through the hundreds of millennia Neanderthals existed.
16%
Flag icon
perhaps the biggest revolution has been the toppling of ‘ice age’ explanations for why they looked and lived how they did. Their bodies were honed for and by hugely demanding lifestyles, whether or not they hunched against glacial winds.
18%
Flag icon
looked at over the full span of time between around 400 to 45 ka, contrary to the clichés, Neanderthals actually lived through more interglacials than glacials.
18%
Flag icon
Drastic transformations in temperature, environment and even sea level sometimes happened over the span of a human lifetime.
18%
Flag icon
when they disappeared. This falls around
18%
Flag icon
40 ka in MIS 3, meaning its climate and environments
18%
Flag icon
what makes this climate cycle distinctive is its instability, temperatures see-sawing rapidly up and down.
18%
Flag icon
123 ka as the sub-stage MIS 5e,
20%
Flag icon
It’s our own pigeon-holing tendencies that limit Neanderthals to glacial worlds, when the reality is far more diverse.
21%
Flag icon
lithics are extraordinarily rich sources of insight about Neanderthal lives.
21%
Flag icon
‘Palaeolithic’ for the most ancient prehistory,
21%
Flag icon
the first Neanderthal fossils to be found seemed to have no accompanying artefacts
21%
Flag icon
knapping features on cores and flakes, researchers can reconstruct the method of knapping and to some extent its sequence,
23%
Flag icon
However cleverly Neanderthals made flakes, for many decades it appeared that they were unable to produce lithic blades, which define the subsequent Upper Palaeolithic culture made by H. sapiens.
24%
Flag icon
Quina lithics were used to cut up carcasses and scrape flesh off skins, typically
24%
Flag icon
why they chose to knap in particular ways and varied the intensity of retouching. Consistent patterns exist across virtually every site, confirming that not only did they preferentially choose high-quality stone when expecting artefacts to require resharpening due to long-term use, but for the same reason
24%
Flag icon
This implies not only constant weighing up and decision making, but an extraordinary knowledge of the geology across wide regions.
25%
Flag icon
For the last 40,000 years of their existence, Neanderthals were manifestly experiencing massive upheavals in climate and potentially also population disruption, but rather
25%
Flag icon
than failing to adapt, their archaeological record is brimming with evidence of innovation and cultural evolution.
25%
Flag icon
The enduring myth that Neanderthal technology was stuck in some kind of cognitive mire, bogged down by minds unable to innovate, is false.
« Prev 1 3 4