Kindred: Neanderthal Life, Love, Death and Art
Rate it:
Open Preview
Kindle Notes & Highlights
25%
Flag icon
routinely as breathing, Neanderthals paid attention to their rock: selecting the choicest types, playing with novel ways to fragment, shifting concepts and skills as needed.
25%
Flag icon
Thinking of Neanderthals as experimenters pushing boundaries may be unfamiliar, but this new view is grounded in the archaeology.
27%
Flag icon
12 layers, spanning 40,000 years.2 Hundreds of hearths, many tens of thousands of lithics and bones are preserved alongside perishable things like leaves, pinecones and carbonised wood.
28%
Flag icon
use-wear confirms that they were cutting meat and skins, in addition to scraping wood.
28%
Flag icon
Neanderthals emerged from a Lower Palaeolithic world where animal remains were already entangled with the production of lithics, but they both amplified and transformed these early traditions.
29%
Flag icon
Over the past three decades the clear trend is for technological lines between Neanderthals and early H. sapiens to grow fuzzier:
29%
Flag icon
Composite tools in themselves also imply impressive mental capacity to plan, design and anticipate.
29%
Flag icon
many of the things Neanderthals made moved considerable distances.
29%
Flag icon
We may well be looking at the emergence of craft specialists in at least some of the technical realms of knapping, wood carving, adhesive production and other activities like hunting or hide working.
29%
Flag icon
range of skills and great accomplishment across diverse materials demonstrated by Neanderthals strongly implies some sort of teaching, matching the fact that directed instruction is common to all living humans.
29%
Flag icon
cultural traditions,
30%
Flag icon
a whopping 3,500 to 5,000kcal every day. That’s over twice today’s typical adult guidelines, and even beyond what world-class athletes burn through.
30%
Flag icon
Living in tough and cold landscapes also pushes energy needs even further. Travelling through boreal forests filled with deep snow
31%
Flag icon
pattern of primary access to carcasses is there early: despite wolves and sabretooth cats lurking
31%
Flag icon
If fewer than 10 per cent of faunal remains have carnivore gnawing, it’s fairly safe to say most of the bones in a site came from Neanderthal food waste.
31%
Flag icon
How exactly were Neanderthals killing all the beasts found in Fumane and hundreds of other sites?
32%
Flag icon
Carbon and nitrogen isotopes from hominin bones can give an idea of where they fitted into local ecosystem food chains,
32%
Flag icon
Canny use of landscape features combined with knowledge of animal behaviour must have underlain situations like the 50-odd horses
32%
Flag icon
By reading the pattern of cut marks across the skeleton, we see time and again that brains as well as other juicy parts like eyeballs, tongues and viscera were favoured by Neanderthals.
32%
Flag icon
For many decades it was assumed H. sapiens were more efficient, inventive hunters,
33%
Flag icon
Neanderthals were regularly eating birds, over long periods of time.
33%
Flag icon
roasted upside-down to weaken the shell
33%
Flag icon
honey,
34%
Flag icon
Wherever bears slumbered, hibernation offered a relatively safe hunting opportunity,
34%
Flag icon
burning hints at cooking right there in the den.
34%
Flag icon
carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes only reflect protein, not carbs.
34%
Flag icon
range of vegetable scraps in Neanderthals’ hearths is impressive:
34%
Flag icon
teeth. Eating produces wear patterns that can be linked to hardness of foods,
35%
Flag icon
A truly twenty-first-century development in calculus analysis has been using DNA to try and identify foods,
35%
Flag icon
perhaps considerable processing by cooking.
35%
Flag icon
cooking not only makes things edible, it also improves nutritional value and often aids digestion,
35%
Flag icon
good evidence for some level of meat cooking.
35%
Flag icon
how did a culture with no ceramic or metal containers do this?
36%
Flag icon
simplest way to store meat (and the hardest to detect archaeologically) is by making jerky – it requires only drying,
36%
Flag icon
fermentation.
36%
Flag icon
Could Neanderthals have had specialised roles in subsistence?
37%
Flag icon
In terms of their diet, Neanderthals weren’t stuck in an evolutionary rut.
38%
Flag icon
in the vast majority of locales it’s not possible to distinguish occupation phases shorter than a millennium, never mind a century. That’s because an archaeological layer can swallow up surprising amounts of time:
39%
Flag icon
Nobody today denies they used fire (as hominins have for over a million years),
39%
Flag icon
But the question of whether Neanderthals simply scavenged it or could produce it is, perhaps surprisingly, still debated.
40%
Flag icon
sometimes Neanderthals invested in constructing hearth features.
40%
Flag icon
Neanderthals there were burning brown coal.
40%
Flag icon
Across many hunter-gatherer societies there’s a spectrum in how fire is used: big open-air blazes for protection, pit fires for roasting, small cooking fires, hide-smoking fires, sleeping hearths for warmth, even anti-insect ‘smudge’ fires. Neanderthal sites show a strikingly close match to the variety in ethnographic data.
43%
Flag icon
bodily waste was routinely incinerated along with grass and potentially
43%
Flag icon
built living space,
44%
Flag icon
they were among the first hominins to create complex, intentional divisions of space,
44%
Flag icon
Neanderthals were fundamentally nomadic.
45%
Flag icon
Among recent hunter-gatherers, settling in one place for a long time – or only moving across small areas – is rare,
45%
Flag icon
open, colder settings require people to be highly mobile and move methodically over huge ranges.
45%
Flag icon
animal kill sites are identifiable precisely because they lack the later-stage lithic products and the richest parts of hunted animals.