Kindred: Neanderthal Life, Love, Death and Art
Rate it:
Open Preview
Kindle Notes & Highlights
45%
Flag icon
there’s no evidence anywhere for truly long-term settlement, on the order of many months.
45%
Flag icon
Some were short stopping places, others homes for longer periods, but all were points on a cycle of movement.
47%
Flag icon
Total population estimates tend to be in tens of thousands or even less.
47%
Flag icon
Studies on recent hunter-gatherers find an average of about 25 people who largely live and travel with each other. Known
47%
Flag icon
no sites have been found where large numbers of contemporary hearths and activity areas would indicate a mass gathering.
47%
Flag icon
despite being very sparsely scattered across the land,5 not all Neanderthals were genetically inbred, and so the question is how they maintained DNA diversity.
48%
Flag icon
Mobility isotopes provide information on where an individual had previously lived,
48%
Flag icon
by comparing the values in teeth to the geology where they were found, it’s possible to see movement from different geological areas,
48%
Flag icon
Among recent hunter-gatherers, the size of regularly traversed land varies drastically, from 250 to over 20,000km2 (100 to 7,700mi.2).
49%
Flag icon
Their closest fellow predators in social terms are wolves, where up to a fifth of individuals at some point are wanderers between packs.
50%
Flag icon
making glue.
50%
Flag icon
What makes the production of clothing especially likely beyond Neanderthals’ physiology is the multiple lines of evidence for massive processing to soften and stretch hides,
52%
Flag icon
Compared to the millions of years before, Neanderthal existence was a major upgrade to hominin life.
54%
Flag icon
the only monumental construction known to have been made by Neanderthals.
54%
Flag icon
Whether Neanderthals had any kind of language is, of course, one of the most enduring questions about them.
54%
Flag icon
Compared to the entire Homo lineage, Neanderthals’ brains are, like ours, enormous.
54%
Flag icon
our own brains have slightly shrunk since early H. sapiens, with no apparent shrivelling in cognitive capacity.
54%
Flag icon
Neanderthal vocal cords could make pretty much the same range of sounds as ours.
55%
Flag icon
When it was confirmed that Neanderthals had the same FOXP2 gene as us, it was taken as strong evidence that they could ‘talk’.
55%
Flag icon
captive apes can learn to express simple ideas – such as ‘give ball’ – using graphical symbols. But they never use this skill to casually chat, despite this defining everyday human communication.
55%
Flag icon
pigments at more than 70 sites, just in Europe.
57%
Flag icon
The weight of evidence from more and more cases of pigment use and mark making is increasingly leading even sceptics to accept that Neanderthals had an aesthetic, symbolic element to their lives.
57%
Flag icon
captive chimpanzees, when materials and the idea of painting are supplied, enjoy colouring and marking surfaces.
59%
Flag icon
What Neanderthals do have in common with early H. sapiens prior to 45 ka is an absence of any unequivocal representational art, manifested by carvings or breath-taking creatures running across stone ceilings.
59%
Flag icon
The oldest known image of an animal was painted before 44 ka in Sulawesi, Indonesia;
60%
Flag icon
many women in traditional societies without reliable contraception tend to either be pregnant or breastfeeding.
60%
Flag icon
It’s even been theorised that a need for birth attenders makes H. sapiens unique.
61%
Flag icon
The dire death rates in seventeenth-century Parisian hospitals, for instance, where you were more likely than not to die giving birth, were down to high infection rates and crude medical interventions. In contrast, traditional societies with informal midwifery traditions, whether hunter-gatherers or not, can be safer.2
61%
Flag icon
dental isotopes
61%
Flag icon
barium is one isotope that’s been proposed as a breastmilk marker.
62%
Flag icon
Injuries and illness, sometimes severe, are very common in hunter-gatherer societies,
62%
Flag icon
numerous bones testify that some outlasted their maladies.
62%
Flag icon
obviously toothless Neanderthal elders like at La Chapelle-aux-Saints existed,
62%
Flag icon
convincing case for long-term support.
62%
Flag icon
orangutans have been seen applying chewed-up leaves to their skin, of the same species used by local Indigenous cultures for pain relief.
62%
Flag icon
Not all Neanderthals were inbred in genetic terms,
63%
Flag icon
Aboriginal cultures, where knowledge of subtle changes in star brightness was maintained over centuries, as well as the 4-millennia-old
67%
Flag icon
cannibalism,
72%
Flag icon
Descendants from deep population branches were still surviving scattered across western Eurasia by 50 to 40 ka.
72%
Flag icon
Dating around 45 to 40 ka, this was the furthest east any Neanderthal had yet been found,
72%
Flag icon
Siberia.
72%
Flag icon
Two main branches split, then remained isolated in Europe and Asia for millennia.
72%
Flag icon
Denisovans
72%
Flag icon
as a population diverged from Neanderthals before 600 ka.
72%
Flag icon
Everything points to Denisovans as an Asian species.
72%
Flag icon
ancestors had at some point interbred with Neanderthals,
72%
Flag icon
the only first-generation hominin hybrid ever found.
72%
Flag icon
the first Neanderthal genome
72%
Flag icon
showed they had directly contributed to our own ancestry.
72%
Flag icon
people lacking sub-Saharan African heritage had significantly more matches to Neanderthals.