On our browser team, as in most serious software development efforts, we followed an editorial process to make changes to our source code. Whenever I finished editing some code, I would write a detailed summary of what my edits did, what feature it implemented or what bug it fixed, and how well I thought my code change accomplished these goals. Then I would find a teammate to review the work with me. The code review process often led to round after round of reviewer feedback, improvements, and requests for re-review. Once everything passed muster in the peer review, and only then, was I
...more
