Alchemy: The Surprising Power of Ideas That Don't Make Sense
Rate it:
7%
Flag icon
The opposite of a good idea can also be a good idea.
7%
Flag icon
Don’t design for average.
7%
Flag icon
It doesn’t pay to be logical if everyone else i...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
7%
Flag icon
The nature of our attention affects the nature of...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
7%
Flag icon
A flower is simply a weed with an adver...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
7%
Flag icon
The problem with logic is that it kil...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
7%
Flag icon
A good guess which stands up to observation is still science. So ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
7%
Flag icon
Test counterintuitive things only because no...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
7%
Flag icon
Solving problems using rationality is like playing golf w...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
7%
Flag icon
Dare to be t...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
7%
Flag icon
If there were a logical answer, we would ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
7%
Flag icon
What I’m fairly sure nobody would say is this: ‘Hey, let’s try marketing a really expensive drink, that comes in a tiny can … and that tastes kind of disgusting.’ Yet that is exactly what one company did.
7%
Flag icon
The models that dominate all human decision-making today are duly heavy on simplistic logic, and light on magic
8%
Flag icon
the French are astonishingly productive on the rare occasion they are not on holiday;
8%
Flag icon
But the economy is not a machine – it is a highly complex system. Machines don’t allow for magic, but complex systems do.
8%
Flag icon
We should never forget that our need for logic and certainty brings costs as well as benefits. The need to appear scientific in our methodology may prevent us from considering other, less logical and more magical solutions, which can be cheap, fast-acting and effective.
8%
Flag icon
The mythical ‘butterfly effect’ does exist, but we don’t spend enough time butterfly hunting.
8%
Flag icon
it is difficult for a company, or indeed a government, to request a budget for the pursuit of such magical solutions, because a business case has to look logical.
8%
Flag icon
Interestingly, the likes of Steve Jobs, James Dyson, Elon Musk and Peter Thiel often seem certifiably bonkers;
8%
Flag icon
The human mind does not run on logic any more than a horse runs on petrol.
9%
Flag icon
if we allow the world to be run by logical people, we will only discover logical things.
9%
Flag icon
Human behaviour is an enigma. Learn to crack the code.
9%
Flag icon
To avoid stupid mistakes, learn to be slightly silly.
9%
Flag icon
Most people spend their time at work trying to look intelligent, and for the last fifty years or more, people have tried to look intelligent by trying to look like scientists;
9%
Flag icon
Rather than being designed to be optimal, it has evolved to be useful.
9%
Flag icon
Logic is what makes a successful engineer or mathematician, but psycho-logic is what has made us a successful breed of monkey, that has survived and flourished over time.
10%
Flag icon
The trick to being an alchemist lies not in understanding universal laws, but in spotting the many instances where those laws do not apply.
10%
Flag icon
The bicycle may seem a strange inclusion here: however, although humans can learn how to ride bicycles quite easily, physicists still cannot fully understand how bicycles work. Seriously. The bicycle evolved by trial and error more than by intentional design.
10%
Flag icon
Similarly, if you expose every one of the world’s problems to ostensibly logical solutions, those that can easily be solved by logic will rapidly disappear, and all that will be left are the ones that are logic-proof – those where, for whatever reason, the logical answer does not work. Most political, business, foreign policy and, I strongly suspect, marital problems seem to be of this type.
10%
Flag icon
you could make equally strong cases that the Remain campaign in Britain and Hillary Clinton’s failed bid for the American presidency failed because of the clueless, hyper-rational behaviour of overeducated advisors, who threw away huge natural advantages.
10%
Flag icon
Notice that Winston Churchill did not urge us to fight the Second World War ‘in order to regain access to key export markets’.
10%
Flag icon
More data leads to better decisions. Except when it doesn’t.
10%
Flag icon
dismissing another suggestion with the smug ‘my data disagree with your anecdotes’.
10%
Flag icon
The need to rely on data can also blind you to important facts that lie outside your model.
10%
Flag icon
It’s important to remember that big data all comes from the same place – the past.
10%
Flag icon
no one has spent enough time asking whether an overreliance on mathematical models of decision-making might be to blame for the fact that in each case the clear favourite blew it.
10%
Flag icon
Highly educated people don’t merely use logic; it is part of their identity.
10%
Flag icon
‘As a general rule the US Government is run by lawyers who occasionally take advice from economists. Others interested in helping the lawyers out need not apply.’
11%
Flag icon
We could never have evolved to be rational – it makes you weak.
11%
Flag icon
Irrational people are much more powerful than rational people, because their threats are so much more convincing.
11%
Flag icon
A rational leader suggests changing course to avoid a storm. An irrational one can change the weather.
11%
Flag icon
Some scientists believe that driverless cars will not work unless they learn to be irrational.
11%
Flag icon
If you are wholly predictable, people learn to hack you.
11%
Flag icon
the single worst thing that can happen in a criminal investigation is for everyone involved to become fixated on the same theory, because one false assumption shared by everyone can undermine the entire investigation. There’s a name for this – it’s called ‘privileging the hypothesis’.
12%
Flag icon
My problem with Marxism is that it makes too much sense.
12%
Flag icon
There are two separate forms of scientific enquiry – the discovery of what works and the explanation and understanding of why it works.
12%
Flag icon
Yet policy and business decisions are overwhelmingly based on a ‘reason first, discovery later’ methodology, which seems wasteful in the extreme.
12%
Flag icon
Perhaps a plausible ‘why’ should not be a pre-requisite in deciding a ‘what’,
12%
Flag icon
The record of science in some ways casts doubt on a scientific approach to problem solving.
12%
Flag icon
And what is the single most important finding of the advertising industry? Perhaps it is that ‘advertisements featuring cute animals tend to be more successful than ads that don’t’.
« Prev 1 3