Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments (Cultural Memory in the Present)
Rate it:
Open Preview
1%
Flag icon
us to take up the cause of the remnants of freedom, of tendencies toward real humanity, even though they seem powerless in face of the great historical trend.
1%
Flag icon
As a critique of philosophy it does not seek to abandon philosophy itself.
3%
Flag icon
Enlightenment, understood in the widest sense as the advance of thought, has always aimed at liberating human beings from fear and installing them as masters.
3%
Flag icon
Enlightenment’s program was the disenchantment of the world.* It wanted to dispel myths, to overthrow fantasy with knowledge.
3%
Flag icon
Knowledge, which is power, knows no limits, either in its enslavement * of creation or in its deference to worldly masters.
3%
Flag icon
Technology is the essence of this knowledge.
3%
Flag icon
Ruthless toward itself, the Enlightenment has eradicated the last remnant of its own self-awareness. Only thought which does violence to itself is hard enough to shatter myths.
4%
Flag icon
On their way toward modern science human beings have discarded meaning.
4%
Flag icon
For enlightenment, anything which does not conform to the standard of calculability and utility must be viewed with suspicion.
4%
Flag icon
Bourgeois society is ruled by equivalence. It makes dissimilar things comparable by reducing them to abstract quantities.
4%
Flag icon
For the Enlightenment, anything which cannot be resolved into numbers, and ultimately into one, is illusion; modern positivism consigns it to poetry. Unity remains the watchword from Parmenides to Russell. All gods and qualities must be destroyed.
5%
Flag icon
The awakening of the subject is bought with the recognition of power as the principle of all relationships. In
5%
Flag icon
Man’s likeness to God consists in sovereignty over existence, in the lordly gaze, in the command.
5%
Flag icon
Enlightenment stands in the same relationship to things as the dictator to human beings. He knows them to the extent that he can manipulate them.
5%
Flag icon
Their “in-itself” becomes “for him.”
5%
Flag icon
In their transformation the essence of things is revealed as always the same, a ...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
5%
Flag icon
The manifold affinities between existing things are supplanted by the single relationship between the subject who confers meaning and the meaningless object,
5%
Flag icon
But the more the illusion of magic vanishes, the more implacably repetition, in the guise of regularity, imprisons human beings in the cycle now objectified in the laws of nature, to which they believe they owe their security as free subjects.
6%
Flag icon
this barren wisdom merely reproduces the fantastic doctrine it rejects: the sanction of fate which, through retribution, incessantly reinstates what always was.
6%
Flag icon
Whatever might be different is made the same.
6%
Flag icon
That is the verdict which critically sets the boundaries to p...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
6%
Flag icon
But because that self never quite fitted the mold, enlightenment throughout the liberalistic period has always sympathized with social coercion.
6%
Flag icon
It fixes the transcendence of the unknown in relation to the known, permanently linking horror to holiness.