From the Bookshelf of Around the World in 80 Books

Find A Copy At

Group Discussions About This Book

No group discussions for this book yet.

What Members Thought

Suvi
"What did it matter where you lay once you were dead? - - You were dead, you were sleeping the big sleep, you were not bothered by things like that. Oil and water were the same as wind and air to you. You just slept the big sleep, not caring about the nastiness of how you died or where you fell. Me, I was part of the nastiness now."

Endless rain, the oppressive smell of orchids, shadows on the walls, cigarette smoke, orange groves, oil fields, guns, and beautiful women fluttering their eyelas
...more
Nadine in NY Jones
Dead men are heavier than broken hearts.


This was really great, and so well-written, filled with hard boiled metaphors and slang so picturesque that I wondered if Chandler was inventing some of it himself.

Marlowe is hired for a fairly innocuous task, which is (accidentally) resolved quickly, but leads to a string of murders building one on another like the house that Jack built. But Marlowe never backs down, he laughs in the face of danger (literally).

Chandler doesn't care for orchids:
The
...more
Ryan
Dec 25, 2015 rated it really liked it
Shelves: 2016, fiction, classics
...no seriously, who hid my bourbon?
Jen
Plot is pretty convoluted, but fantastic characters, dialogue, pacing, and prose style.
Pam
Oct 26, 2007 rated it it was amazing
Read this one again, after may a 30-yr interval, so maybe it could be considered a "new" read. Some of the verbiage is dated and not quite so politically correct but it was written in 1939 so take that into consideration. The story/plot is terrific! I read this w/ a group (4MA) and came to some "new-to-me" insights. Marlowe as the Knight -- the codee of ethics he upholds. There are several references (opening w/ the knight in stained glass & knights on the chess board in his room) that would hav ...more
Doina
Sep 17, 2007 rated it really liked it
Shelves: mystery
if anyone has seen the movie based on this book, it is very easy to see that bogart and bacall were the only reason that the movie was even remotely interesting. the book is so much better. i highly recommend it to anyone interested in that time period, and who enjoys good detective stories.
Elizabeth
May 14, 2007 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: fiction
Kay
Aug 28, 2007 rated it really liked it
Shelves: fiction, american-lit
Sarah
Sep 10, 2007 marked it as to-read
Shelves: owned, tbr
mstan
Nov 10, 2008 rated it liked it
Shelves: american
Terri FL
Sep 05, 2010 added it
Shelves: read2008
Oblomov
Oct 11, 2011 rated it really liked it
Jayme Pendergraft
Jul 20, 2013 rated it it was ok
Shelves: 2013, src-summer-2013
Sivan
Aug 08, 2013 marked it as to-read
Numbedtoe
Mar 08, 2014 marked it as to-read
Tiffany
Jun 26, 2014 marked it as to-read
Scott Flicker
Dec 28, 2014 marked it as to-read
Jen
Sep 15, 2015 marked it as to-read
Ra
Oct 17, 2016 marked it as to-read
Brian
Jul 08, 2017 added it
Shelves: fiction
superawesomekt
Jan 10, 2018 marked it as bibliocurious
Jocelyn
Apr 08, 2018 marked it as to-read
« previous 1 3 4