From the Bookshelf of Reading the Detectives…

The Documents in the Case

Dorothy L. Sayers

Start date: February 10, 2018

Finish date: March 8, 2018

Discussion: Buddy reads

Why we're reading this: Sayers' only full-length non-Wimsey crime novel.…more
[close] Sayers' only full-length non-Wimsey crime novel.

Find A Copy At

Libraries

Group Discussions About This Book

Showing 2 of 468 topics — 9,047 comments total

Buddy reads

* Starting/joining in with buddy reads
By Judy · 1334 posts · 372 views

last updated 2 hours, 2 min ago

* White Nights by Ann Cleeves (Shetland #2) (August/Sept 25)
By Susan · 29 posts · 12 views

last updated Sep 04, 2025 12:17PM

showing 10 of 10 topics view all »

What Members Thought

May 16, 2011 Abbey rated it liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: vintage, myst-set-andor-auth-uk, reviewed, myst-fems-project

1930, Dorothy L. Sayers & Robert Eustace
Epistolary novel concerning a possible murder, and the lengths a son goes to, to find out what really happened; slow-moving classic tale, not one of Sayers' best - three-and-one-half stars.

Told from a variety of viewpoints via letters and court documents, this is the sad tale of a mis-matched married couple, and the neighbors who turn their lives upside down. Mr. and Mrs. Harrison are a nice suburban couple - he rather older than she, and neither understan 1930, Dorothy L. Sayers & Robert Eustace
Epistolary novel concerning a possible murder, and the lengths a son goes to, to find out what really happened; slow-moving classic tale, not one of Sayers' best - three-and-one-half stars.

Told from a variety of viewpoints via letters and court documents, this is the sad tale of a mis-matched married couple, and the neighbors who turn their lives upside down. Mr. and Mrs. Harrison are a nice suburban couple - he rather older than she, and neither understanding the other's point of view much. Mr. Harrison is set in his ways, and his much younger second wife is finding it hard going living with him, but things seem to be ambling along in their lives fairly decently, until two young men move in upstairs - a moody would-be novelist, and a charismatic young painter. Together they, and the Harrison menage, get very mixed up and upset concerning "relationships", and the end result isn't good for Mr. Harrison.

We get to see the four main characters through the eyes of each of them via correspondence with the others and some court documents, and of a couple of the peripheral characters as well, beginning with the loopy "companion/help" for Mrs. Harrison - she's a middle-aged, quite repressed spinster lady with peculiar ideas about romance. Although she manages to stir up a great deal of trouble, she and Mrs. Harrison get on very nicely, and it's her account of the young men that we first see. Her perceptions of the situation from her quite partisan viewpoint sets the tone for what evolves into a rather peculiar story, extremely slow-moving and moody, but interestingly constructed nonetheless.

Near the end of the novel Ms. Sayers spends one enormous chapter expostulating on The Meaning of Life, Spirituality, Chemistry, and The Universe" amongst several academics and one of the main protagonists, and this is stultifyingly boring. It's meant to show an important clue to the solution of the mystery, but is so complexly set out that it's entirely bewildering. I gleaned the intent from the later information in the story, and wish she'd mostly eliminated that chapter - it was very wearing!

Anyway, various odd things happen in the inter-relationships between Mr. and Mrs. Harrison, the companion, the artist, and the novelist, and later with Mr. Harrison's son Paul, who questions his father's peculiar death. Beautifully plotted, and mostly smoothly written, this is still awfully boring - tremendously boring in spots, particularly the medical/biological information necessary the authors felt necessary to solve the mystery is obscure and convoluted (presumably this was Mr. Eustace's contribution to the book). It really drags the pace (and the plot) down, and almost sinks the book.

It's an interesting attempt at a different sort of story for Sayers, and almost works, but not quite. Perhaps it seemed a better story when epistolary novels were rather more popular? I am admittedly not much of a fan of them (excepting Dracula, of course). DOCUMENTS is somewhat entertaining, in a mild and quietly interesting way, but not anywhere near Sayers' best work.

...more

6 likes · Like · see review

Oct 06, 2016 Bev rated it liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: bought-2016, mystery, vintage-mystery, mount-tbr-2021, british-mystery, epistolary-novel

This mystery novel is a departure from the usual Sayers fare. There is no Lord Peter Wimsey or Bunter to be found and the story is told almost entirely through letters and written statements from witnesses. When Paul Harrison, whos has been working on bridges in Africa, receives word of his father's death, he returns to England to find that the coroner's inquest has returned a verdict of Accidental Death. It has been determined that George Harrison accidentally killed himself with poisonous toad This mystery novel is a departure from the usual Sayers fare. There is no Lord Peter Wimsey or Bunter to be found and the story is told almost entirely through letters and written statements from witnesses. When Paul Harrison, whos has been working on bridges in Africa, receives word of his father's death, he returns to England to find that the coroner's inquest has returned a verdict of Accidental Death. It has been determined that George Harrison accidentally killed himself with poisonous toadstools. Paul isn't having any of it. His father was an expert on edible plants and would never have picked, let alone eaten the Fly Agaric (Amanita muscaria) in mistake for the Warty Cap (Amanita rubescens). He is convinced that either his father had realized that his wife no longer loved him and wanted to marry another and committed suicide or that his step-mother and/or her lover decided to remove the obstacle to their happiness.

The difficulty is proving it. Harrison was alone all day at "The Shack"--the cabin where he stayed when on one of his wildlife rambles. He had invited Lathom--his supposed friend and his wife's lover--to spend the holiday with him, but Lathom had gone up to town early in the morning. A local villager had seen Harrison alive and well...and hunting mushrooms well after. And Lathom appears to have an alibi. Not that alibi are all that useful in cases of poisoning--one doesn't necessarily have to be on the spot when the victim swallows the deadly brew.

Paul gathers letters written by the deceased, by Lathom's roommate John Munting, and (most stealthily) by his step-mother to Lathom, as well as depositions from various witnesses and tries to piece together what happened in the months leading up to his father's death. He convinces Munting to help him and it is Munting who helps him discover just exactly occurred on the day George Harrison died. A little bit of scientific magic gives him the evidence needed to prove how his father could be poisoned by muscarine without having made a mistake in his mushrooms.
This is an interesting alternative novel in the Sayers oeuvre. The use of the various documents allows the reader to view each character and incident from numerous points of view. It underlines how not just beauty, but also truth is in the eye of the beholder. Picking out the bits of essential truth from the personal animosities and prejudices of each character's version of the events is the task of Paul Harrison and the reader if we are going to get to the truth of George Harrison's tragic death.

The story is also an examination of marriage--of what can go wrong, especially when two people are so very mismatched. There is very little understanding between Paul Harrison and his second wife. He expects her to be the little angel of the house that his first wife was and she wants him to be more demonstrative of his affection and to share interests with her rather than giving "little lectures" on his pet subjects--painting and bizarre edibles. Neither are willing to give an inch to reach an understanding. He goes his way--thinking she'll be happy at home. And she finds someone who she believes appreciates her more. Such misalliances don't always lead to murder, but they do lead to a great deal of unhappiness. Sayers allows murder to solve the unhappiness problem, while we (the reader and Paul) have to worry at the problem of how to solve the murder.

I found this to be highly enjoyable...to a point. The letters were very interesting, giving insight into all the characters and handing us clues when we weren't necessarily paying attention. I also enjoyed the small portion of the actual investigation that Paul Harrison and John Munting do. Where it falls down on the job is just at the point where the story ought to be picking up speed--when we head into the home stretch of figuring it all out. Sayers, for reasons that are inexplicable to me decides to dump a whole chapter on the "meaning of life, chemistry, the universe and everything" (apologies to Douglas Adams) which is meant (I think) to clear the path to the solution but is just plain deadly dull. I mean, yes, I see how it gets Munting to where he needs to be in order to ask certain questions of a certain specialist--but ye gads. Surely we could have gotten there by a less philosophically dense route. As it is we come into the finish feeling rather flat. ★★★ (a better ending would have boosted the rating.)

First posted on my blog My Reader's Block. Please request permission before reposting portions of review. Thanks. ...more

2 likes · Like · see review