Bob’s
Comments
(group member since Jun 22, 2011)
Bob’s
comments
from the Catching up on Classics (and lots more!) group.
Showing 81-100 of 4,651


My review
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
I rarely link to a review of mine, but since I differ from most of the above posts, I thought I would try to explain.

Before joining the group, the thought of reading Dickens was scary, I just couldn’t see myself reading one, I guess I thought the language would be too hard. In 2011 the group voted for Oliver Twist, I figured what the hell, I ‘d give it a try. I learned I really like Dickens. Since then, I have read 9 novels and half a dozen short stories.
Prior to this one winning, the next Dickens on my TBR was Bleak House. The group voted for it in 2016 and I have yet to get to it. Instead I read The Pickwick Papers and The Old Curiosity Shop. If reading another Dickens novel is in my near future I will make it Nicholas Nickleby, simply because the discussion will be fresher.


National Book Award for Fiction (1940), Goodreads Rating 4.20

Socraticist, I don’t think Maugham or London are overrated or underrated. I think they are simply forgotten. Fame is fleeting and time marches on. Are the “Beatles” as popular now as they were in the sixties and seventies?
I am always hoping for a good story regardless of the author's fame. Nevil Shute comes to mind. He has never delivered to me anything less than a good solid story. His placement on the writers pyramid of fame will be considerably lower than the likes of Faulkner and Hemmingway, both of which I prefer to leave on the shelf. He is less known than both Maugham and London. Yet, all three deliver good solid memorable stories that the public seems to have forgotten.
It is interesting how popularity works. It seems to have less to do with quality and more to do with promotion.

This discussion will open on April 1
Beware Short Story Discussions will have Spoilers
Feb 24, 2025 04:09PM
