Canavan’s
Comments
(group member since May 15, 2018)
Canavan’s
comments
from the Spells, Space & Screams: Collections & Anthologies in Fantasy, Science Fiction, & Horror group.
Showing 661-680 of 1,078

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4...
I snapped this one up. It boasts a nice line-up of authors and all but two of the stories are original to the anthology.

This was a competent story, but only that. I really expect more from this particular author, who I regard as pretty talented. There are a fair number of questions that go unanswered by story’s end, and while I don’t find that ambiguity necessarily hurts a story, in this case I couldn’t determine whether it was artful or just a reflection of unimaginative/lazy writing. However, I think my biggest quibble is that the tale doesn’t really fulfill the editors’ promise in the introduction to seek out fiction that goes “beyond body horror and Hodgson-esque mushroom people”.
✭✭✭

Well, no more. They are both gone, burned to the ground the morning of 30 May during the riots. Don Blyly, the owner and co-founder, reports that insurance will probably not cover the damage and so it is unclear whether he will be able to rebuild. Yes, I know that compared to loss of life, etc., etc., this sad event may seem trivial by comparison. But it somehow strikes me as symptomatic of the unhinged times in which we seem to be living. I’m struggling to imagine how anyone, regardless of their political persuasion, can perceive this as anything other than a senseless act of destruction that diminishes us all.

Maybe it’s just me, but I had a hard time connecting with this story. (view spoiler)
✭✭

This is another story that the group previously encountered in Steampunk II: Steampunk Reloaded . Here is the brief entry I wrote for this one back then:
(view spoiler)
✭✭✭½

While I like the explicit idea Canavan I thought it was just a deep friendship and bond over men-at-arms. Maybe some guilt over Salmon dying at the hands of his invention.
Perhaps you are right, Lena. I’m just not sure. The line that started my spidey senses tingling comes early in the story:
“There was a familiar warmth in his friend’s voice, in which Tom sometimes to his secret shame found comfort amidst the clanking, heaving darkness of the steam ram during prairie nights.”

This was another story that, although for the most part competently told, didn’t quite gel for me. In some respects it evokes memories of the old Tom Swift books, specifically, the earlier ones that started seeing publication during the first half of the 20th century; on the other hand, most of the references (the Parrot rifle, Edison’s age, etc.) would seem to indicate that the story’s action takes place sometime in the 1860s or maybe early 1870s.
Some of the questions I had after reading this story: (view spoiler)
✭✭

This one was a bit of a miss for me, although it was not wholly devoid of merit. Tobler is better here at characterization (although I’m still a little fuzzy on Plenty’s motivations) than she is at plot or describing action. Events unfold in a kind of hurried, jerky, arbitrary fashion. This might have worked better as a novel or novella.
✭✭½

We read this story not too long ago in one of our previous group reads. Here’s a slightly edited version of what I wrote at that time:
I typically enjoy Kiernan’s fiction, so it’s no real surprise that I came away from this reading experience with generally positive feelings. I liked, for example, the almost poetic descriptions of Missouri’s dancing and the gentle eroticism that permeates much of the story. My enthusiasm is a bit tempered by concerns about the tale’s brevity. In short, I wanted more. Kiernan’s story struck me as almost a thumbnail sketch of a character.
✭✭✭½

Having never watched any Star Trek, would you say this is a good place to start? Or should I build up to that by starting at the true start of the series?
You could do worse than follow Lena’s suggestion of going back to the original Star Trek episodes. Keeping in mind the caveat that the scripts were sometimes unfortunately a product of their time, in my estimation perhaps a fourth to a third of the episodes hold up fairly well, not too shabby for a television show that’s half a century old. One of the downsides of plowing through the original episodes is that for every half-way decent one, there are one or two real stinkers, especially when you reach the third (and last) season.
If you forced me to pick just one series with which a novice ought to start, I’d probably go with The Next Generation. Not because it’s necessarily the best of the lot (although I happen to think it is), but because, even more than the original series, it kinda serves as the framework for most of the series that followed. One big problem with Generation is that, whereas the original Trek ended badly, Generation started out badly. It sounds harsh to say this, but the show only began to find its footing after its creator, Gene Roddenberry, died and the reins were passed to others. I think that the first time I had the sense that Generation might actually evolve into something respectable was with the airing of the second season episode, “Elementary, Dear Data”.

✭✭✭½


Chilling Adventures of Sabrina, Season 3 (2020) ✭✭

Candyman is back... and I would have been more excited had they stuck with the original story.
Jordan Peele’s involvement makes me hopeful. And I’m actually a little tired at this point of unimaginative, slavish reboots/remakes/sequels; I’m okay with the idea of this being a “spiritual sequel” to the original. I’ll suspend judgement for the moment.

My ratings of the three Matrix movies.
#1: An instant classic. Wonderful, flawless.
#2: Just Ok, some parts are very good.
#3: Abysmal.
I'm concerned by the quality ARC for what this portends for #4.
Yeah, I agree with pretty much all of what you said.

Looks like Matrix 4 is happening.
I’ve heard bits and pieces about this project since late last year. While I wouldn’t go quite as far as calling this venture a cynical cash grab, I nevertheless have the sinking feeling that — in spite of the involvement of one of the Wachowskis and some of the actors from the trilogy — this movie is doomed to be an aesthetic failure.

I don’t even know where to begin with Skywalker, so maybe I’ll just say that I’ve always viewed Abrams as a reasonable director but a poor writer and, unfortunately, his fingerprints are all over this script.
Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker, J. J. Abrahms (2019) ✭✭½
Terminator: Dark Fate, Tim Miller (2019) ✭✭½
A few other recent viewings:
Drums Along the Mohawk, John Ford (1939) ✭✭✭
San Antonio, David Butler, Robert Florey, & Raoul Walsh (1945) ✭✭
Driving Miss Daisy, David Esbjornson (2014) ✭✭✭✭

I somehow missed the story from earlier this month that jazz keyboardist Lyle Mays passed away on 10 February “after a long battle with a recurring illness”. Mays had quit playing professionally as of 2011, but in his heyday he was one half of the old Pat Metheny Group. I was able to see him perform as part of that ensemble a couple of times back in mid to late 90s.
