30 New and Upcoming Books Absolutely Everyone Wants to Read

There are readers who like to discover obscure titles and then there are readers who want to read the books that have everyone abuzz with excitement right now. For this latter group, we've put together a list of Extremely Of-the-Moment Books—all published between April and June of 2022—to scratch that "what should I read next?" itch. (It's a terrible malady, we know!)
These titles span a number of genres, but they share one thing in common: they've grabbed the top 30 spots on Goodreads members' Want to Read shelves for this particular publication window.
So go ahead, scroll over the covers below to learn more about each book, and add a few (or all! We're not the boss of you!) of them to your own Want to Read shelf.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What's a new book you think everyone should add to their Want to Read shelf? Let's share recommendations in the comments below!
Check out more recent articles:
New Historical Fiction By Time Period
The 60 Most-Reviewed New Books of the Past 5 Years
42 New Nature Books to Connect You with the Wild
Check out more recent articles:
New Historical Fiction By Time Period
The 60 Most-Reviewed New Books of the Past 5 Years
42 New Nature Books to Connect You with the Wild
Comments Showing 1-26 of 26 (26 new)
date
newest »

None of those books make me want to read them...


I'm interested in ONE book, Memphis. Not an interesting list.


My exact thought as I was looking at the list. No a single one of these looks worth the time or money.
Guess we're not in the subset of "absolutely everyone."

"Well, none of these books interest ME!" <---You're not so special, Sweetie. ;-)
Make a book recommendation and just leave out your negative snottiness, please. There's already enough negativity around these days.


"Well, none of these books interest ME!" <---You're not so special, Sweetie. ;-)
Make a book r..."
Because the post is literally called "absolutely everyone" wants to read these. That's obviously never going to be true so... why even name it that? It's not about superiority, it's about pointing out clickbaity nonsense.

"Well, none of these books interest ME!" <---You're not so special, Sweetie. ;-)
Make a book r..."
I have to say I agree. There is a sense of hostility and pouting that is voiced with these kinds of lists that is annoying and definitely unnecessary! I've tried to ignore it over the years; however, it's gotten old. What is needed at this time is constructive feedback, not kvetching.

"Well, none of these books interest ME!" <---You're not so special, Sweetie. ;-)
Make a book r..."
Agreed. I do feel like websites/media tend to push the same books with the biggest marketing budgets but to not be remotely interested in any of these books? Yes, they are all fiction but a pretty wide variety of fiction. And even if you aren't, why the need to always announce it?

Right. We shouldn't point out how dreadful these lists are and the tired formula of Want to Read shelves to compile the lest.


"Well, none of these books interest ME!" <---You're not so special, Sweetie. ;-)
Make a book r..."
WoW! What a "snotty" negative response. Just because the titles aren't interesting to some doesn't mean they have a superior attitude.




"Well, none of these books interest ME!" <---You're not so special, Sweetie. ;-)
Make a book r..."
The only negative comment is yours- the rest are simply giving an opinion or pointing out the absurdity of the article.
And and... Does publishing know other birds exist? Why is it always magpies? Why do we never have herons, cockerels, cassowaries, kiwis, the noble hen?