date
newest »

message 1:
by
Lori
(new)
Sep 13, 2015 07:20AM

reply
|
flag

I've found that a few typos will always make it through to the finished product, however many eyes have looked at it, but you're right - there are way too many books out there that are just riddled with errors.
An editor isn't a fancy optional extra, in my opinion. An editor is a necessity.

All focus was lost after that. ;)

All focus was lost after that. ;)"
Ha! And it totally turns out I wasn't lying about it being the most polished manuscript I'd sent in. Very few edits, and today it's off to line edits, so not long now until I find out a release date!

Yey! Glad to hear it. You just made my day. :)

But... sorry, this seems like a really not nice subtweet about a specific author who's deemed egotistical and a sort of writer and I really, really think that was out of line and seriously not even necessary to get your pro-editor point across.

I don't agree that it's out of line to start a conversation using an author's stated public opinion on the subject. I agree it may not have been necessary, but it was reading her opinion on the matter that made me start thinking about it, which is why I brought it up.

So, since you really had a specific author in mind, why not name them? I'm really only getting sensitive to subtweets all around the web, which seems cowardly and mean and not at all helpful to me.
That is just my opinion, of course, but I would either choose a direct confrontation or just keep the underlying hostility/annoyance out of it at all.

And the problem with subtweeting is that you never really know whom someone is talking about, but you have an idea—and maybe it's right or wrong—and that is really just only damaging.

The reason I didn't mention the author wasn't because I was being cowardly or mean, it was because this post was about my reaction to her taking that particular stance, and nothing more. I was trying to avoid a discussion on that particular author's works, since this blog post is about my opinion, and not about the quality of another author's books/ For what it's worth though, the author is Anne Rice and she has repeatedly stated publicly that she doesn't use an editor.
Here's just one example: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/11/boo...

And yet, had I mentioned the author by name in the post, someone else might have said I was calling her out for no reason.
I mentioned her stance on editors to try and give this blog post some context. I didn't mention her by name because I didn't want the discussion to be about her and her books specifically. I certainly wasn't being sneaky or underhanded, or trying to make anyone guess who it might be, I was just pointing out that there are other authors, some of them quite famous, who don't feel the same way I do about the value of editors.

Please take my comments as only one feedback of how your blog post came across to me.
I don't want to unnecessarily quarrel over this longer. I'm trying a different approach here by, um, not subtweeting or just thinking to myself.


“You can please some of the people all of the time, you can please all of the people some of the time, but you can’t please all of the people all of the time” ~ John Lydgate
Personally speaking I LOVED your blog and the thoughts inspired by the author's opinion, and I was much more interested in discovering YOUR reaction than knowing any particular names.
Really looking forward to getting my hands on Darker Space. Kudos on getting your most polished manuscript to date, and respect to editors and the magic they weave.

As soon as I've got the release date for Darker Space, I'll be sharing it everywhere!

You just proved the point of your post lol. :D
Can't wait for more DS!!!
Mel *I guess nowt changes except ourselves* wrote: "Okay, thank your for explaining your reasoning and motives.
Please take my comments as only one feedback of how your blog post came across to me.
I don't want to unnecessarily quarrel over this ..."
i think it's cool that you stated your interpretation and reaction. I didn't read it at all this way, focusing on Lisa's feelings about editors. Knowing Anne Rice's feelings about them, I'm not surprised she was the catalyst lol
Also, for what it's worth, you two didn't come off as quarreling to me.