date
newest »


Well, lots of people now are using Quicken, and similar personal programs.
Access is not enough. To get started, one needs someone to show one how (I had a money-wise friend). Then one needs follow-through. Yearly (and, if one is self-employed, quarterly) taxes do something to keep me motivated. Also, those nice colored graphs are viscerally rewarding...
But in general, young people and especially young women are _not_ taught how to manage money, nor to be conscious of it as their personal ecological basis. Or, at best, they learn a nickle-and-dime frugality without learning enough about dollars. This is very disempowering.
Ta, L.




Note: Ekaterin runs into a lot of these problems, and pulls herself out through application (and a few books and a Tsipis). (-: Yay, Ekaterin!

Accounting Game: Basic Accounting Fresh from the Lemonade Stand
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x23b...
That is a very interesting statement. Consider it in the real world in relation the knowledge people have to apply it.
Accounting was among the first things big organizations used computers for in the 50s. But double-entry accounting is 700 years old. So why isn't accounting taught to everyone now so they can use these computers that are more powerful than 1980s mainframes?
Would we have had the housing bubble and Ninja loans if everyone in high school had been taught accounting since 1990?
The uterine replicator would not require everyone to know much about it, only that it was available. These cheap computers are a decentralized technology and what gets done with them depends on what people know.