date
newest »


Plus I don't really wear pink, so there's that. ;)"
You were one of the people I was thinking of, when I said that there were only a few I could point to. I love your reviews, and would be absolutely devastated if you stopped.


Oh, Susanna. Thank you. I won't, if I can help it.

It feels like a vicious cycle to me. The more it is perpetuated, the fewer the people who will feel comfortable reviewing negatively, honestly.

Keep doing what you are doing!


Thank you, Jess. I find the same thing upsetting. My friends here have been so supportive for the most part, and I wish other authors would stand up for their rights to review as they have the potential to add so much to the community with their discussions.


I think you can safely consider yourself an author. And yes, I hope you won't reviewing either. You certainly won't lose me as a friend, no matter what you say about my books. ♥




I think it's nice for the authors to review other books which are by other authors (I feel awkward when I see authors reviewing their own books), but guess what? When they review books by other authors, people may easily think they are badmouthing those other authors and their books if said author fails to come up with anything less than fangirl-praising.

And yeah, I realize it's an uphill battle with people who don't understand what you do, but you're definitely not alone. And I think you are a good example to people who can read widely and prolifically, review, and write. Triple threat for talent. :)

That's exactly it. Anything less than absolute praise is unacceptable; and criticism means you think that your own work is perfect and everyone else can go to hell.

Thank you so much for your kind words, Rose. You are always so eloquent and succinct.

We're basically book nerds who somewhere in there put a book down and said "I can do this!" Hell, in your own profile you mentioned re-writing the endings of books you were unsatisfied with...glad to know I'm not the only person who did that. But yeah, that's how it starts; we read, we digest, we decide we can jump in the pool.
And is any trade different? Some kids see a plane shooting through the sky, decide that it looks like fun and eventually grow up to be pilots. Others wander through a beautiful building, get inspired and become architects or builders.
All creators have to start somewhere, and that "somewhere" is as a fan of somebody's work.
And you know what? The best creators never stop being fans. My father is a builder, pretty well-known for his craftsmanship (in a narrow field) and he's never stopped touring famous buildings, reading up on the greats...its how he learns, and one author to another it is how I learn. I'm pretty sure its how you do too.
C.S. Lewis once remarked that a tree grows by adding rings, but a train does not grow longer by moving from one station to the next. Sure, authors are sorta-kinda different from fans who don't write...but so what? Where is it ordained that we have to give up our "fan" status when we publish? Why are we denied an opinion just because we put our hand in?
We are readers first, authors second...and we remain readers. Our opinion still counts. I don't think it counts more or less. I think it counts, period.
And as to bitchy people making things complicated...well, the indie scene has some serious mafiosi tendencies I am very much not fond of, having run afoul of them myself for "daring" to voice honest opinions about books I didn't like. Oh sure, I believe we indie authors ought to support each other...but "you scratch my back, I scratch yours" is how corruption starts. Fuck, that's what corruption IS, especially when back-scratching comes at the expense of the paying customer.
You are one of the few indie authors I've met who actually understands how the game is supposed to be played, what our role is and what it should be. You write, you read, you review - and you take criticism on the chin with a smile like a proper author should. Example: my review of Cloak And Dagger was not entirely complimentary and neither was all of my commentary...but you liked the review all the same and kept a good humor about my jibes. I loved the hell out of that BTW. :)
Anyway, as I see it we authors have just as much right to be fans as anyone else...hell, any author who forgets their humble origins (*cough*ANNE RICE*cough) is asking for trouble.
We have a right to our roots. So, keep writing, keep reading, keep reviewing. I will too and I won't lose a second's sleep over it. If somebody has a problem with that, it's their problem. :D

I know you've suffered for it. I've seen firsthand how butthurt fans have one-starring all of your books simply because you voiced an opinion contrary to their own. It's unfair and it's petty, but you're bigger than to let some fool stop you from doing what you love. I respect you more than you know :)
I'm not gonna review though, NEVER EVER. It's not because I don't read, or I'm afraid to say what I think about something. Believe me - I'm a mouthy as hell.
Goodreads (and Booklikes) are my playground. I come here to see what people are talking about and goof around while I'm waiting for the muse to make her appearance. I have so little time to write that if I get sidetracked it will stop me. I know it. So I'm trying to keep it light and focus my energy on the sweet spot while I'm still alive.
I need to start painting again :)
Don't give up, don't stop! I'm not an author (believe me, you don't want to see me try to write, it's god-awful), but I still think I understand. I've seen some of the attacks and wrongdoings. I haven't been here long enough to know what went on years ago, but I've still seen "some stuff" happen in the year and a half I've been here. It bothers me when I see authors attacked for "daring" to write a review that is less than 3 stars (shoot, I've even seen some attacks for 3 star reviews). You've got lots of support here and that's not going to change. <3

We're basically book nerds who somewhere in there put a book down and said "I can do this!" Hell,..."
Well, if you can't laugh at yourself...
Thanks, Eric. I like that you review too, and that you also take criticism with a grain of salt instead of flying off the handle.

I know you've suffered for it. I've s..."
Oh, I understand. I think we've had this conversation before. Not gonna lie: I wish there were some Derrolyn bookshelves to creep on this site, because I'd love to see what your inspirations were as a whole, but some people come here just to observe and interact and I respect that. :)

Reviewers in general have a pretty crappy time of it. Especially these last few months. Goodness--the drama! I get so frustrated seeing the terrible things that happen to my (exclusively) reviewer friends.
But at the same time, it can be frustrating for me, too, because there are definitely times that I feel left out or excluded from the benefits of the reviewing community.

Exactly--if you receive a high rating from someone who doesn't inflate their ratings, it's kind of like you've won over someone who is difficult to win over and it gives you an extra fuzzy feeling inside.

I love the fact that your reviews are honest (they aren't sugarcoated but they aren't malicious either.) You are one of the few authors that act professionally-you don't flip out if someone gives one of your stories a one star review. You take it on the chin and move on.
I have been hesitant to post reviews for fear of backlash but now I'm realizing that I have a right to express my opinion.
message 29:
by
Karlyflower *The Vampire Ninja, Luminescent Monster & Wendigo Nerd Goddess of Canada (according to The Hulk)*
(new)

I guess I can understand both sides of this argument, though. I adore your honesty and the fact that you will fight the uphill battle for your fellow author/reviewers. LOVE, LOVE, LOVE.
However, I also know what it feels like to get bullied (maybe not here, I'm relatively lucky here) and I know afterwards it's draining and exhausting work just to put one step in front of the other, sometimes. I guess what I'm saying is.... confrontation is easier for some people to handle than others. Especially if that confrontation and negativity is an attack towards your person.... or a judgement of your pains.
I guess what I'm saying is I love you and keep up the good fight (I would miss the hell out of you if you turned in) but try to remember that your truths (emotionally) are not always other peoples, is all. ♥

I love the fact that your reviews are honest (they aren't sugarcoated but they aren't malicious either.) You are one of the few authors that act professionally-you don't..."
You absolutely have the right to express your opinion.
And thank you--I'm so glad you think I'm professional.

I guess I can understand both sides of this argument, though. I adore your honesty and the fact that you will fight the uphill battle for your fellow author/review..."
LOL yeah I'll be the first to admit that I can be sensitive. And I'm not going to lie--sometimes this profession can take its toll on me, psychologically, and there are times when I've had to step back.
message 32:
by
Karlyflower *The Vampire Ninja, Luminescent Monster & Wendigo Nerd Goddess of Canada (according to The Hulk)*
(new)


message 34:
by
Karlyflower *The Vampire Ninja, Luminescent Monster & Wendigo Nerd Goddess of Canada (according to The Hulk)*
(new)


This is why I tell budding writers the following; "give serious thought about whether or not you want to publish. Publishing means going pro. When you're doing it for fun, it is about fun...but once you put it out there for people to pay for, it becomes a business - or in other words work. Do you really want writing to be your job? Keeping it a hobby is no bad thing."
Really, more writers need to ask themselves that question...especially now that thanks to the internet there are so many ways in which a writer can get group validation without having to endure the pummeling of the business world that is publishing.
Writers don't need to "go pro" to be heard. I do believe the internet has changed the game about personal expression, and the writer scene needs to play a little catch-up ball and re-examine some of its core beliefs. Maybe that's just me.

Thank you so very, very much for your extremely well written, thorough, honest, and often hilarious reviews. You've directed me to books that have brought me hours of enjoyment and steered me clear of many a real stinker. You aren't trying to sell me something and you aren't doing favors for your friends. Because of this, I can trust you to give me the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Keep up the good work, and know that we silent ones are here, reading your reviews, and admiring your giant cojones.

HAHA is my disdain for Divergent so infamous? :P
I get it. I think people put a lot of themselves into their books. It can be hard to deal with criticism unless you're able to dissociate from your work.

Oh yeah, writing for money unveils a whole other set of expectations. Quality of the work and the way you conduct yourself--it's all totally different. In some ways, I was prepared. In others...not.

Thank you so very, very much for your extremely..."
Oh, Rory! Thank you so much for your extremely kind words. You made my day. :')

I tend to encounter two arguments for this, the first, 'I'm afraid of retaliation' is I suppose possible. I've been reviewing honestly for a couple of years and I have one review I think might be retaliatory, but it averages in with everything else, so, so what?
The second, 'I don't want to hurt anyone's feelings' or 'I know how hard books are to write' complete dismisses the fact the books are written to be read and (hopefully) talked about. But most of all it always just strikes me as artificially inflated empathy. In short, it's touchy-feely BS.
Don't stop reviewing. Not just because readers need honest reviewers out there if they ever want to find an honest review, but also because we need to counteract the impression that no author's review can be trusted.

Hi, Sadie! Thank you so much for dropping by.
Those two arguments are pretty much the sum of it. And people adhere to them firmly. Lord help you if you challenge convention. It's really puzzling, because I don't ever remember this mode of behavior officially becoming the status quo.
I'm so happy that you review as an author as well, and I definitely agree that it is important for readers to be able to trust authors' reviews without wondering what might be in it for them. :)

It's really sad to think that the creators of books are forced to feel uncomfortable about sharing their analysis/opinions of other books. But I hope you continue, because you are really great at it.
Plus I don't really wear pink, so there's that. ;)