He was guilty, she was not, at least not of adultery

Sorry for the disappearing act. I could blame it on the Deadline Dragon, which is my usual MO. For all I know, he had a hand—or claw—in the spread of the Black Death, the San Francisco earthquake, and even the constant failure over the years of the brilliant, subversive series, Buffy and the Vampire Slayer, never to receive a single Emmy nomination. But he is actually innocent for once, or as innocent as dragons ever are. I was AWOL for a more mundane reason—I wasn’t feeling well this week.
I hope to get back to Outremer today, where Baldwin has been much sicker than me, stricken with pneumonia. You’d think having to cope with leprosy would be more than enough for the lad, but that disease also compromised the immune systems of lepers, making Baldwin vulnerable to other ailments, too.
Before I disappear back into the 12th century, May 2nd was an interesting day on the historical calendar. On May 2nd, 1230, William de Braose, grandson of Maude de Braose, who’d been starved to death in one of King John’s dungeons, was publicly hanged by Llywelyn Fawr, having been caught in the bedchamber of Llywelyn’s beloved wife, Joanna. I say “beloved” because there is no other explanation for what he did---he forgave her and eventually restored her to favor, even though doing so was a great political risk. In the MA, cuckolded husbands were figures of fun, especially older men married to younger women, as was the case with Llywelyn and Joanna. His risk was compounded by the fact that Joanna’s lover was, like her, Norman-French, so Llywelyn’s Welsh subjects were even more outraged by her behavior. If the skeptics need additional proof that Llywelyn loved his wife, upon her death, he established a Franciscan friary in her honor, a gesture right up there with Edward I’s Eleanor crosses for his deceased queen.
12 likes ·   •  14 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on May 02, 2015 06:48
Comments Showing 1-14 of 14 (14 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Therese (new)

Therese I just recently finished Here Be Dragons, and I didn't know how it was going to end. You had me hanging on to the edge of my seat, and I was so glad that Llewellyn forgave Joanna.


message 2: by Sharon (new)

Sharon I hope I didn't spoil the suspense for you, Therese! I forget sometimes that a lot of my readers haven't read Dragons yet since it was written so long ago. What I loved about writing of medieval Wales is that I could really surprise my readers. You can't do that with the Tudors or even many of the Plantagenets, but back when I started writing my Welsh trilogy, their history was not that well known, even in Wales. I had people come up to me after book signings there and tell me they wished they'd been taught about the Welsh princes in school.


message 3: by Therese (new)

Therese How could you spoil the suspense? I was just hoping you were not going to kill her off even if it was real! When I read your other books, I knew what was coming still hoped against hope. This was different and as I move forward, it will be a surprise because I don't know this history – yet.

I keep reading American history and am surprised at all we are not taught. I guess they can only teach so much, but that is so cool that Welsh folks are learning more about their history from you too.


message 4: by Sharon (new)

Sharon Sadly, Therese, history seems to be neglected in schools all over the world these days. And I should warn you--if something actually happens in real life, it does in my books, too. I still have more mercy to my readers than GRRM, for he has a choice of killing his characters off and I don't! At least not if they really lived, and the vast majority of my characters were real, aside from some of the ones in my mysteries.


message 5: by Therese (new)

Therese Yes, unfortunately you are right.

When reading about the Plantagenets, I still wanted them to live even though I knew they were not going to. You made me care about them so much. I don't know if that has ever happened when I have read before, but it is certainly appreciated. I also appreciate when you tell us at the end the characters that you created. I'm always amazed that there are so few, and then I usually have to go look up on the Internet to find out more stuff. You definitely do your research! It shows!


message 6: by David (new)

David Elkin Sadly, history in American schools is very poorly taught. That is why some get so upset over movies and TV shows that play loosely with history. EG; JFK movie. Loved the movie, horrible history. Great Historical Fiction such as Sharon and others write is now our best vehicle.


message 7: by Sharon (new)

Sharon Thank you, David. That is a lovely compliment. I've always seen historical fiction as a means of opening a door to the past, luring people in who might have resisted a straight history. But I do feel very strongly that we owe it to our readers and to the people we write about to be as accurate as possible. If we have to fill in the blanks, as is too often the case, or if we are forced by the story line to make some alternations to known history, I think it is essential to let readers know about that in the Author's Note.


message 8: by David (new)

David Elkin Bravo, and I agree 100%. Look at the stuff they make up about poor Edward II.


message 9: by Sharon (new)

Sharon He is lucky to have a champion in Kathryn Warner, whose website does a good job of separating myth from reality where his life is concerned. I was personally very relieved to find that the story of his death by a red hot poker is not true, for that would have been a horrible way for anyone to die.


message 10: by Leila (new)

Leila Hi Sharon, the brilliant 'Here be Dragons' is my second favourite of your books. Sunne has always been my favourite. It is interesting sometimes to read other author's books on the same periods in history. In another novel William and Joanna are discovered by Llewellyn's daughter rather than Llewellyn himself. Is this particular incident one of those bits of history that we don't really know the details about and the only fact available therefore is that William is hanged and Joanna sent away?


message 11: by Sharon (new)

Sharon No, the Chronicle of the Princes does not leave room for doubt, Leila. "That year William Breos the younger was hanged by Llywelyn ab Iorwerth, after he had been caught in the prince's chamber with king John's daughter, the prince's wife." You can argue that they were not caught "in the act" itself, but there is no doubt these were very compromising circumstances.


message 12: by Leila (new)

Leila What I really meant Sharon was that this particular novel I read it was stated that William and Joanna were caught in the actual act in Joanna's chamber by Llywelyn's young daughter who immediately rushed to sob out what she had witnessed to Llywelyn who then himself went to see if this was the truth and found them in the act just as his daughter had told him. This surprised me as I hadn't heard those details before?


message 13: by Sharon (new)

Sharon We do not have the actual details, Leila. All we know is what I quoted to you from the Welsh chronicle.


message 14: by Leila (new)

Leila That's absolutely fine Sharon. I was just interested. Thank you.


back to top

Sharon Kay Penman's Blog

Sharon Kay Penman
Sharon Kay Penman isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Sharon Kay Penman's blog with rss.