Edward of York

Since my Facebook readers asked to friend me knowing that I’d written a thousand page book about Richard III in which my Richard bore little resemblance to Shakespeare’s bottled spider, I think it is safe to assume that most of you are Yorkists at heart. So today we celebrate the birthday on August 28, 1442 of Edward, eldest son of the Duke of York and Cecily Neville. (Just in passing, no, I do not believe he was the result of a liaison between the proud duchess and an archer; I think that is about as likely as my chances of finding a unicorn in my garden tomorrow morning.) Speaking of unicorns, anyone read that short story by James Thurber, in which a husband tells his ill-tempered wife that there is a unicorn in their garden, which does not end well for the wife.
Getting back to Edward of York, I confess that he is one of my favorite characters. There are very few I enjoyed writing about as much as Edward, and I missed him very much after he had to die. I think it was his sense of humor that I found so appealing; Edward took little in life too seriously, including himself, and it was great fun writing his scenes with his wife, who took everything with deadly seriousness. He had interesting flaws, too; perfect people are rather boring, both in person and in fiction. You can usually tell if I do not like a character in one of my books; he will have no sense of humor whatsoever and will be cheap in the bargain; paging Henry Tudor. But I play fair. You all know Edward I is not one of my favorite kings, but he did have a sharp sense of humor and I let the readers see that, as well as other admirable qualities like his courage, intelligence, affection for his wife. Now his father, Henry III, was by no means a villain; he was a decent man simply in over his head, a convincing argument against hereditary kingship. Naturally I loved writing about the Welsh princes, who offered me a rare opportunity to surprise my readers.
I think I probably had the most fun, though, with the Angevins, for Henry and Eleanor and their Devil’s Brood were all born scene-stealers, quick-witted, sardonic, dramatic, ruthless, and always entertaining. I am going to miss them even more than I missed Edward once Sunne was finished. Fortunately, writers are fickle and we move on, so I am now having fun in Outremer with another cast of colorful characters, for as my favorite writer, Mark Twain, expressed it so well---Truth is always stranger than Fiction, for fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities, and Truth isn’t. Certainly not when the Plantagenets were involved.
PS This was also the date in 1192 that Conrad of Montferrat, newly named as King of Jerusalem was murdered in the streets of Tyre by two of the feared cult, the Assassins. I didn’t get to give him many scenes in Lionheart since he was at odds with Richard, who supported Conrad’s rival, Guy de Lusignan, not one of Richard’s better decisions; the bitter rivalry between Richard and the French king, Philippe Capet, led both of them astray more than once. Conrad will get more time on center stage in Outremer, much more so than his elder brother, who was of great importance to the kingdom, but who got only one line of dialogue in his brief appearance.
11 likes ·   •  14 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on April 28, 2015 07:02
Comments Showing 1-14 of 14 (14 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Starless One (new)

Starless One I have already mentioned how much I like Edward... But I can't call myself a Yorkist if it means (and I guess it does) to be anti-Lancaster. I like the Lancastrians too much, with the exception of Henry Tudor although I don't think he counts.

Your emphasis on a good sense of humour is very interesting, for it is a writer's ability to write genuinely funny scenes that distinguishes him or her in my opinion.

Thanks for the insight, I truly love these blog entries.


message 2: by Sharon (new)

Sharon Thanks, Sulime! I would not count Henry VII as a Lancastrian, either. I enjoyed writing about the Lancastrians, and one day I hope to bring John of Gaunt into a novel about Owain Glyn Dwr.


message 3: by Therese (new)

Therese I absolutely love the Plantagenets…… Still my favorite monarch is Elizabeth I. Surprise especially with my picture!


message 4: by Sharon (new)

Sharon I find Elizabeth very interesting, too, Therese. She truly was a survivor.


message 5: by Therese (new)

Therese It is amazing that she ever became Queen, against all odds, and definitely survivor, not to mention single woman. I can relate except I'm not Queen except in my house :-)


message 6: by Sharon (new)

Sharon I think she had a genius IQ, Therese, which is what enabled her to survive a horrific childhood and girlhood, experiences that would have destroyed most young women. Look at her sister Mary's problems. Elizabeth had her emotional scars, too, but she could still function at a high level. Henry VIII should be burning in Hell just for the way he treated his daughters.


message 7: by Therese (new)

Therese I have always thought of her as a great observer of people, circumstances, and maybe a little lucky. Mary decided she had to marry whereas Elizabeth didn't. I find that to be so interesting. She knew she could rule and I'm so glad she did. I wish she hadn't killed off Mary, but with everything that was going on, I suppose it is understandable. I wonder if Mary had more time with her mother and developed more of her bitterness for going through things for so much longer? Thinking… Henry was something else is all I can say.


message 8: by Iset (new)

Iset I have to agree on the genius IQ, Sharon. The sheer number of languages she could command, and could do so from even a young age - presenting Katherine Parr with a translation of Mirror of a Sinful Soul, aged just 11 - that indicates to me a high degree of precocity.

Interestingly, this may have run in the family - and I don't just mean Anne Boleyn's precocious command of French from a young age. Young Edward was also extraordinarily precocious with languages, as was Mary.

To me it seems perhaps not coincidental that all three had this extraordinary talent. Of course they had the best tutors, but even so... Then again Henry's learning as a young king was highly praised too, but what did he do with it! It seems, however, that the Tudors had a bit of a high IQ in the family. Pity that high IQ doesn't always equate to common sense or emotional stability!


message 9: by Sharon (new)

Sharon I agree that they were obviously intelligent, Iset. I knew Edward was a linguist like Elizabeth,but I hadn't known that was true for Mary, too.


message 10: by Iset (new)

Iset It seems to be less well known about Mary, but she could read and write Latin fluently as young as 9 years old. She seems not to have taken on as many languages as Elizabeth and Edward - only Latin, Spanish, Italian, and a smattering of Greek - but that's good enough for me to say she at least had some of the same talent as Elizabeth and Edward.


message 11: by Sharon (new)

Sharon Without a doubt, Iset. That is impressive.


message 12: by Ivana (new)

Ivana Edward IV had the same birthday as me... well, sort of, since I think his birthday was actually 28th April only per the Julian calendar. Close enough, I guess.


message 13: by Sharon (new)

Sharon Happy Belated Birthday, Ivana.


message 14: by Ivana (new)

Ivana Thank you!


back to top

Sharon Kay Penman's Blog

Sharon Kay Penman
Sharon Kay Penman isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Sharon Kay Penman's blog with rss.