Superman and Dehumanity Part IV — the Contradiction

Continued from previous.

One can indeed write a story that contradicts one’s own world view. Any author unable to disguise his personal opinions for the sake the story he tells lack the essential Puckish dishonesty of the auctorial tribe, and should not be set to telling tribal lays.

However, one cannot hide the world view of the story itself, since this forms the theme, and informs or influences (at least, in works of art maintaining minimal integrity) the plot, character, setting, and style.

A Dehumanist author can write a dramatic tale, but a dramatic tale cannot be a dehumanist tale except in the one exception all ready mentioned: any story of rebellion against authority, and story that expresses relief or morbid enjoyment at the discovery that life is meaningless, and that no final judgment nor eternal life awaits us, can be written dramatically and honestly.

Anything else is dishonest, or, at least, lacks an essential element of drama.

I have made a bold statement: but if we accept what has been said previously about the elements of drama, no other statement will do. Let us recall these elements. What is required for a drama to be truly dramatic?

Read more