Comparing Reviews

As noted in my prior “editorials” on book reviews, I make it a rule never to take issue with a review’s qualifications or reservations. However, I think it’s instructive to give reviews attention when particularly interesting contrasting viewpoints are revealed. To do so, reinforces the reality that readers approach a book with their individual backgrounds and values and that it is impossible to please everyone in every respect to the same extent.

I also try to spread the word when compliments are expressed regarding cover art and editing.

As for varying perspectives on heat content, consider the following reviewer excerpts:

“Didn’t care for the male sex scenes being described, but I made it through them. It fit perfectly with the story, it’s just out of my comfort zone.”
versus
“There is nothing explicit in this book, so if you are expecting some saucy scenes then be prepared for disappointment. Saying that though, every scene is very well written.”
versus
“This one was full of interesting elements that were shocking, even for me. Ha. Shocker…”
versus
“This book is written for adults, because there is graphic and vulgar material. Which is all very tasteful in my opinion, I would definitely recommend this novel.”

As for sophistication of language and reference to potentially obscure persons and events:

“Loved the storyline, travel and such a colorful blend of characters. Also loved the words you use, it’s not often I get to look up less used words and what they mean. I was at the dictionary many times throughout this book. Love to learn about new things so all the lawyer and plays were a bit entertaining.”
versus
“What was not appealing and took a star off was the language. (example:" With an expression that was part incredulous but mostly crestfallen" ) There were far too many phrases that were at a graduate school level. I actually looked something up because I was stumped…I did enjoy it and I would recommend it to the older readers (over 40) because there were quiet (sic) a few references to musicals and old time Hollywood actors that the younger audience wouldn't appreciate.”
versus
“He told the story using intelligent words, the story was well thought out and executed extremely well.”
versus
“I have to say that I found all the references to classic movies and plays a treat.”

As for editorial and cover kudos:

“This book is extremely well edited and I felt that the way it has been presented shows that the author is proud of his book and has spent time fine tuning it to make it perfect for the reader.”
“Turner's Point by author Gordon Osmond is deep. A lot is hiding beyond that chiseled chest of a cover. The author did a nice job with character creation and editing. 4 Stars for enticing cover and alluring plot.
“Mr Osmond definitely has a talent for writing, as his book is flawless. I just couldn't fault anything. Great cover, great story, great characters....yep great book!”
“Just finished and loved a few things about the book. Give the proofreader a raise, there’s only one error I found, punctuation a ? outside quote marks at the end of a sentence.”
Here, in defense of the editing of Turner’s Point, I must take exception to the notion that a question mark may not be placed outside of quote marks at the end of a sentence. Under American, as opposed to British usage, the only punctuation marks that must always precede quote marks at the end of a sentence are periods and commas. For example, this is correct: “Should he have called her a “bitch”? Equally correct is: “He shouldn’t have called her a “bitch.”

I should emphasize again that I have been treated with great generosity by all reviewers; I have nothing but gratitude to express to each and every one of them.