If Lynn Shephed Cares About Writing, She Should Try it.

Remember that I call my Blog "Genrefied." I do that because I genuinely believe that writers should write what they want to write and then do their best to sell it. I've written and sold horror, science fiction, comic books, roleplaying game rules and fiction, young adult fiction, and several fusions of all of the above. I am currently writing a crime novel with co-author Charles R. Rutledge, writing an apocalyptic sci-fi piece for one publisher (It hasn't actually been announced yet so I'll avoid dropping names), editing a media tie in novel for the Alien Franchise, waiting on line edits for a THE BLASTED LANDS, my latest Fantasy novel, Working out the final scenes for a weird Western, and am in negotiations for a third book in my Subject Seven Young Adult series. I've written advice columns and have a book of non-fiction essays under consideration right now.

I'm kind of all over the place and I rather like it that way.

So when I see someone called on doing exactly what I think we should all be doing, I pull out my soapbox and make a quick statement. This is one of those moments and the person I'm defending most assuredly does not need my help but she's getting it anyway.  Why? Because I admire J.K. Rowling and the article I'm disagreeing with annoys me.

I'm not a massive force in publishing and I'm the first to admit it.

Would I like to be? Absolutely. Will it happen? No idea, but I'll keep trying….

What I will NOT do, however, is resort to the sort of whining diatribe offered by Lynn Shepherd (Who has apparently written a couple of novels that are in print and more power to her) offers up as justification for why a successful author should bow out and make room for everyone else.

Here, take a break and read the Huffington Post article if you haven't already. It isn't overly long and I can wait. I work under the assumption that this is an editorial piece.

I'm sure that Ms. Shepherd is well-intentioned, but honestly, what a load of fecal matter. The gist of this seems to be that, because J.K. Rowling has achieved a phenomenal level of success, because the demand for her books is staggering, she best selling author should quit writing and allow more room for other authors.

I believe one suggestion comes down to Ms. Rowling knowing her place, and trying to contain her writing to things she writes for children and things she just writes for herself. How very rude of her to want to write in other areas.

Again, what a load of fecal matter.

Doubly so because Ms. Shepherd makes this (suggestion? demand? desperate plea to let her play at the big writers table?) in the same breath where she admits to having read none of Ms. Rowling's works.

I'm a mid list writer. I can accept that. I am a fan of writing. I love reading books. I love a good story. These are things that make me happy, and a lot of what I read might be obscure, but you can bet I can enjoy a well-written best seller with the best of them (and can throw aside a best selling piece of tripe, too.).

Know what I do when I hear about a writer that no one can resist? I go buy a book and read it. A lot of times I'm pleasantly surprised, though I'll also admit that there are plenty of occasions where I'm disappointed. It's the curse of being a writer, I think, that we're obligated to read with a critical eye and often find ourselves wondering what the hype is all about. It's also a delight when we run across books where the flaws are either minimal or easily ignored. Tom Monteleone once compared the writer's ability to read a book as roughly the same as a mechanic's ability to enjoy a good car ride. There's a need to pop the hood and checkout the inner mechanics to understand what makes that beast run so well or why the engine ticks and stutters. I don't think he's at all wrong.

What I don't do. What I don't ALLOW myself the luxury of doing, is whine about how somebody else got all the breaks or how that person's good fortune is somehow kneecapping everyone else.

I've never met Ms. Shepherd. She might be a mighty fine writer in her own right and she might have the very best of intentions with her article. I just completely disagree with her sentiment.

My advice? Go buy Ms. Rowling's books, any and/or all of them and find out what makes her a phenomenon. If that's too much effort, go the Hollywood route and Netflix the movie adaptations. Rowling shows more depth in her characters than a goodly number of successful writers and she also does what every writer should strive to do: She evolves as a writer.

Or, barring that suggestion, sit down and write another novel. Do your very best to make it amazing and  then do your very best to sell it. Then try promoting it and hope for a larger piece of the proverbial pie. In other words, EARN your way, the exact same way that Stephen King, J.K. Rowling Tom Clancy and dozens of other best sellers have managed over the years. The same way mid-listers have been doing it for as long as there have been publishers of popular fiction.

The results are probably going to work better for earning your place as a writer than whining about how somebody stole your seat at that big writers table.






3 likes ·   •  2 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 24, 2014 15:36
Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Numbedtoe (new)

Numbedtoe I agree so much. That and from a PR standpoint, and writers have to learn some basic PR skills since we're a part of selling ourselves via our work, she screwed up so phenomenally since she just assured that a good many people will never, ever, check her work out. I won't. And if that makes me contrary, I'm ok with that.

She called out not only the highest selling author of all time, but the highest female selling author of all time. She didn't single out King, Koontz or a dozen male authors that are highly sucessful and say they need to retire so she can get more buys. She singled out the highest selling female author. When as a woman you would think she'd understand not only the prejudice that women face in general, but how many studies have shown that large numbers of readers write off female authors without giving them a chance. Just seriously pisses me off. And it's a poor business and PR tactic to allinate your potential audience.

Writers write. Some of the authors I've loved the most wrote practically clear up till their deathbeds, and died of old age with scores of books under their belts. I hope to join them in volume and age.

Part of being a writer is the freedom to do what you want. You tell the stories you want. You write the books you want. You write as many books as you want. Well ok, on that one, most of us have books we want to write and never get around to, but you feel me. I would go crazy if I were told "You can write seven books, and ONLY seven books, then you must retire cause the great lord of Sheppard said so." Screw that.

I think she wanted some press for picking on Jo and didn't realize there really is such a thing as bad press, how finicky readers can be, and how easy it is to alienate people who are torn in where they will spend their time and money. And how passionate fans of Rowling can be.

I also love the car/mechanic analogy, I'd never heard that. It finally put into words something I've noticed that I do. If I love something I pick it apart and really go over what works for me and what doesn't. If I don't like it, holy crap do I pick it apart. It's hard for me to just read a book and leave it alone.


message 2: by James (new)

James I think the careful examination of what we read and enjoy (or DON'T enjoy for that matter) is part of the process. There are plenty of writers where I read a sentence that moves me so much I have to read it several times.

That's part of the process, and part of the fun.


back to top

James A. Moore's Blog

James A.   Moore
James A. Moore isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow James A.   Moore's blog with rss.