date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Avanders
(new)
Jan 24, 2014 08:20AM
The problem, if one exists, with the current team is that they're all science-based. As an attorney, I should be added to the expedition team to provide a logical and analytic perspective to the evaluation of the area, as well as, frankly, an outsider perspective that might bring to the observations a human element. Moreover, as someone who has always been interested in the sciences and, in particular, anthropology, I will offer a likely-welcome level of enthusiasm and excitement for the project when the scientists get lost in their analysis. Most importantly, I should be included in the expedition because it sounds fascinating and I would love to go!
reply
|
flag
I should definitely be added to the expedition team because I can carry a shitload of beer and toilet paper and because I fear nothing (except spiders and small enclosed spaces). Thank you for considering me for this expedition.
I think what the expedition team lacks one vital component: protection. It's no wonder why teams in the past have come to "bad ends". You can't just send a bunch of nerds into the wilderness without someone to protect them. That's where I come in. Give me a machete, a pistol, a rifle, sufficient ammunition, and food and I can guarantee that you team will be safe. As an experienced hunter I am confident that if you add me to this expedition into Area X your team will make it back alive.
Hi! Thanks for this, but this is a mirror post. Can you post to the original blog post? Here's the link: http://www.jeffvandermeer.com/2014/01... Thanks!


