Spying and Expectations of Privacy

German scientist with detective camera (Bain News Service/Flickr)
My friend Jim Anton and I were chatting on the phone the other day about all the scandals surrounding government spying. Jim is a scientist who had the fearlessness to teach high-school kids. Now, fortunately for the sake of his blood pressure, he's left the classroom and he and his wife Jean are publishing e-textbooks for exam prep. Jim's comment to me was, "Their having so much personal data really opens up the potential for blackmail." After I thought for a moment, I said, "Maybe not." There's a younger generation with a new set of values. If generalizations in the media can be believed (careful, there), Millenials have little expectation of privacy. At least among your circle of text-able friends, there are no secrets. And aren't we seeing this trend played out every day in the celebrity and political arenas? How was it possible that Anthony Weiner thought he still had a shot in the mayoral race, even after those embarrassing personal disclosures? How is it that Rob Ford thinks he can hang on to his job? Same way, years ago, Marion Berry bounced back. (Hey, "the Three Mayors" should practice singing tenor.) And even though it happened not all that long ago (when Millenials were babes in arms), would the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal last more than a week these days?

Picture it: The shady operative sidles up to you and whispers, "I have pictures of you zipping up your pants, coming out of a cemetery." "Oh, yeah," you say. "Not just me. My homies got snaps up close and personal! I mean, it was hysterical!"

By the way, I turned to Jim for a reality check on the cold fusion process I describe in Farnsworth's Revenge. We agreed:  

The one thing a scientist fears much more than being proven wrong is being made to look ridiculous.
And, thanks to the boobs who have made bogus claims...
Cold Fusion Researcher = Clown Gerald Everett Jones
La Puerta Productions
www.lapuerta.tv
1 like ·   •  6 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 15, 2013 08:08
Comments Showing 1-6 of 6 (6 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Lilo (new)

Lilo Anyone is welcome to spy on us. All they'll potentially find is cat shit (so far undetected in corners).


message 2: by Gerald (new)

Gerald Lilo, that actually sounds like it could be a valuable service. And if the findings can be composted, you could generate methane - have your own supply of natural gas. I wonder what the cat-food-to-BTU conversion rate is? If you have to factor in the vet bills, I bet it's a negative return. Ah, well.


message 3: by Lilo (last edited Nov 16, 2013 04:10PM) (new)

Lilo Oh, dear! I better make sure that my husband doesn't read your comment. He is a physicist and likely to experiment. With 31 cats, he'd have enough material to work with. -- It would never cover the vet bills anyway. I assume we are paying our vet's mortgage.


message 4: by Gerald (last edited Nov 16, 2013 05:17PM) (new)

Gerald I got suspicious when I started to see a new therapist and he got a brand new BMW the next week. The time after that when I showed up for my session, I saw the car had been sideswiped - torn from front to back on the passenger side. He had it repaired to look like new, but I wondered whether he didn't somehow feel guilty about having this new toy and manifested the "punishment." I know I felt better.


message 5: by Lilo (new)

Lilo I didn't quite get you. Are you relating the therapist to our vet? Our vet is actually very nice, capable and knowledgeable. And he charges less than a human doctor. Still, with 31 cats (most of them aging) and 2 dogs, it does add up.


message 6: by Gerald (new)

Gerald Seems like nothing was lost on you. I'm sure I had at least 31 neuroses.


back to top

Gerald Everett Jones - Author

Gerald Everett Jones
Here's where I rant and rave. ...more
Follow Gerald Everett Jones's blog with rss.