I’ve been watching more and more science fiction (perhaps loosely defined, in some cases) television shows lately, something I haven’t really done much of in a while. Some have really drawn me in, while others – even though the production values are probably very similar – haven’t, but in some cases I’m having a hard time coming to grips with just why one sci-fi show appeals to me and another doesn’t
Let’s take two examples that are along similar basic lines and who seem to have significant followings: Falling Skies and Defiance. Falling Skies caught me right away and has held my attention. Defiance, on the other hand, resulted in an interest score of “meh” from the get-go, and after a few episodes my wife and I couldn’t bring ourselves to spend time watching it anymore.
The question is, what’s the difference between them? Is it just a matter of taste, or is there something deeper?
Some of my other favorite shows include Fringe (which probably ranks as my current fave overall) and – this came to me as a surprise – Grimm. Granted, Grimm isn’t exactly science fiction, but I include it because the producers took what I initially thought was a pretty silly premise and made into something exceptional. But on the “meh” side we have Warehouse 13 and Primeval (although I’ll confess that we need to watch a few more episodes of Primeval to give it a fair chance).
So, what are your favorite vs. your “meh” sci-fi shows, and why do you think one appeals and the other doesn’t?
The post What Makes A Good Sci-Fi Show? appeared first on Michael R. Hicks.
Published on August 01, 2013 04:05
My thought would be to look at some successful sic-fi shows, and find a common property. Star Trek and Babylon 5 come to mind.
What both of those shared, in my view, was a larger overall story told in episodes that could easily stand alone. Something in each episode grabbed your attention while reenforcing your ties to the characters.
I guess then that the character dynamics carry the show in the end?