Is anything private anymore? No, and that may be the fault of the post-9/11 panic

Short answer: No.

I fear we really are living in a national security state.  A few weeks ago I would have said that is an
exaggeration, but reading these linked stories, no more. No wonder Eric Holder thought
it was no biggie to begin fingering reporters as co-conspirators in leaks. In
the crowd he is running with, he's probably considered a wild-eyed civil
libertarian. Even so, I think it is past time for him to walk the plank.

Among the outfits reportedly turning over access to surveillance
mechanisms: Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk, AOL, Skype, YouTube,
Apple. All those smug hipsters in skinny jeans sold you out. I feel justified
in my withdrawal from "social media." Is Steve Jobs's overweening smile the
face of 21st century American totalitarianism? Maybe so -- I always suspected
there was something sinister about California cool.

They say this program was designed to target foreigners.
That may be how it started, but I don't trust these guys to obey strict limits.
So I think it is time to bring the surveillance agencies under control. The
national leadership panicked after 9/11, and now 12 years later we have an
Orwellian surveillance program. Forget Benghazi. This is the juicy target that
the American right -- and left -- should be going after. A New York Times editorial avers that the Obama administration has
"lost all credibility" on the issue.  

As an Army colonel said to me a few years ago, How can you win a war for your values by
undermining them?

(A Best Defense 21-gun salute to Bart Gellman and his
homies on this one. Somebody throw this guy a Pulitzer.)