Today's Times ambiguation
It may be my advanced age and incipient MCI, but I cannot make any sense of this. Google won a USA Today contest for most imaginative print ad, which everyine found amusing/appropriate/contradictory. Larry Kramer, publisher of USA Today, found it "hysterical" that Google won:
As for the japes about Google as a destroyer of print media rather than a supporter, Mr. Kramer said, “Everything we say about Google, the nice thing is that they have to search something.”
The Times obviously understood this remark, or they wouldn't have printed it, but I don't. Can someone paraphrase?
As for the japes about Google as a destroyer of print media rather than a supporter, Mr. Kramer said, “Everything we say about Google, the nice thing is that they have to search something.”
The Times obviously understood this remark, or they wouldn't have printed it, but I don't. Can someone paraphrase?
No comments have been added yet.
John Crowley's Blog
- John Crowley's profile
- 825 followers
John Crowley isn't a Goodreads Author
(yet),
but they
do have a blog,
so here are some recent posts imported from
their feed.
