date
newest »
newest »
Carolina, I agree. We need very tight controls on guns in this country. They work very well at controlling violent crime in other countries, while our gun deaths keep spiraling upward in the U.S. -- 18 per day since Newtown. Check out what Wikipedia says about the U.K.: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_poli...
Thank you for the article, that was great. Two things that got my attention while getting through it were these two : "The United Kingdom has one of the lowest rates of gun homicides in the world with 0.07 recorded intentional homicides committed with a firearm per 100,000 inhabitants in 2009 compared to the United States' 3.0 (over 40 times higher) and to Germany's 0.21 (3 times higher)." and : "Fully automatic (submachine-guns, etc.) are totally prohibited from private ownership and self-loading (semi-automatic) weapons of calibre larger than .22 rimfire or shotguns are totally banned other than in Northern Ireland. All other rifles and their ammunition are permitted with good reason, which may include target shooting, hunting, and historic and black powder weapons, but not self-defence. Shotgun possession and use is controlled, and even low-power air rifles and pistols, while permitted, are controlled to some extent. A firearms certificate issued by the police is required for all weapons and ammunition except air weapons of modest power (of muzzle energy not over 12 ft·lbf for rifles, and 6 ft·lbf for pistols). Shotguns with a capacity of three rounds or less (up to guns with a magazine holding no more than two rounds, in addition to one in the chamber) are subject to less stringent licensing requirements than other firearms; shotguns with higher capacity require a Firearms Certificate."
That is something that needs to be done (similarly) in the United States. While the articles goes that there have been protests, public opinion over there holds stronger than rifle or weapons' organization. Sadly in the US, the NRA still has too much power and not just from its members but from Congress.
Carolina wrote: "Thank you for the article, that was great. Two things that got my attention while getting through it were these two : "The United Kingdom has one of the lowest rates of gun homicides in the world ..."
Thank you, Carolina! To effect change, people need to speak more loudly than lobbyists, and, even more important, people need to vote. As the last election showed, voters are still the most powerful force in the political system.




However I think these people that support buying as much and many types of guns as they want are not really Christians or faithful but rather they, like organized religion has many times, use the name of God or Christ and what not, to justify for what they are doing or supporting.
The issue of gun control in the US is something that should be discussed. If people want to own a gun, then they can, however the issue is what type of gun and how many. There should definitely be that, a gun control and a thorough background check. It is difficult and possibly impossible to know if the person buying the gun does have or not bad intentions but if there was a more thorough background check and limiting the number of weapons a person buys (also prohibiting certain guns like assault rifles), there is a greater chance tragedies like that of Newton, and what happened in a movie theater at the Dark Knight Rises premiere, might be prevented.
When I saw the news of Newtown it made me mad and sad as well. I want to be an optimist however, and believe that there will be a change regarding guns and stricter gun control