A Return to Freelancing

For some time I've been trying to figure out what I'm going to do with The Freelancers (otherwise know as the serial Emma DNFed haha~ Admittedly it did take me a rather long time to get to the point with the first draft. I've since completely rewritten the first five chapters). It is in my mind a trilogy and the hold up has always been that... well it is obviously not suitable for traditional publication, and I didn't want to self publish it if I couldn't get the whole thing out. I did not want a different editor for each book. I wanted the money available to guarantee Book III would come out before I released Book I.

I played around with a couple of different ideas about how to accomplish this, nothing seemed likely to work and as I've moved on and published other things the less I've really wanted to publish this story versus just releasing it.

Let me explain: I'm getting kind of sick of reading "this book isn't really [insert genre]" attached to reviews of my books. Okay, yes, I get that it's important for reviewers to express themselves on these points so that readers can make an informed decision ... but at the same time I've had publishers/editors and other writers hold up these comments as proof that the stories I want to tell are not worth telling because they don't fit a freaking checklist of everything a satisfying "romance" (or whatever) should be. I hate these rules. I hate that when you publish something people can fill a review with praise but then caution others against reading because it won't deliver the pre-packaged fantasy they want. It's unbelievably frustrating to be told that good writing is about following the formula.

The Freelancers is very much that frustrating un-checklist book. It's a spy novel that focuses more on the black comedy of government bureaucracy, it's a crime drama where the mob deals more in fraud and counterfeiting than glamorous drugs, guns and whores, it's a story of human trafficking that focuses on forced labor of male victims rather than the tantalizing sex slavery cover story. It's a M/M romance that will more than likely end like a Tarantino movie.

It's not perfect, it's not a masterpiece. There's still something not right about it to me ... like I'm reaching out but not exactly hitting what I want to say, not really capturing the feel of the books that intoxicated and inspired me (The Human Factor: Inside the CIA's Dysfunctional Intelligence Culture and McMafia: A Journey Through the Global Underworld mainly). But it occurred to me the other day that when I started writing it I just wanted to have fun telling a campy, snarky, violent story. Like the early James Bond movies: fun, sexy and semi-ridiculous without being outright comedy.

At some point along the way my thinking about this story got corrupted. I got distracted by the idea that I had something to prove as a writer. I couldn't do a B-movie style book, I had to produce something people could respect. I got away from what I wanted and the whole project just became a clusterfuck.

So, I know what reviewers will say and I kind of don't want to fucking hear it . Not in a special-snowflake-my-work-is-glorious sort of way ... I just don't understand this attitude of reading books to get the story you've already decided you want. I have my kinks and my interests, but give me a book that tries to do something different any day.

This last year I've learned that I'm mostly alone in that desire for different. That's okay ... but it makes me less interested in putting out books, less interested in being "a writer", versus finding a different way to get the story out there.

So here's what I'm thinking. Fuck it, I'm putting The Freelancers series out as a private release. Meaning that, if you want to read it, email me, PM me, comment here and I will send you a copy for free in the format of your choice. Review it or not, redistribute it to others, put it up on those illegal book pirate sites. I do not fucking care. Anyone who wants can have-- I will even send it to you in an editable format so that you can rewrite it if you want-- but it will not be available for download on Smashwords or for purchase anywhere.

It will not be edited, and those of you who have read my serials before know what that means. I have a learning disability I've struggled with basically my entire life. I leave endings off words, occasionally leave out words or swap them for others by accident. Deal with. I will do my best to clean up everything as much as possible, but I'm not hiring an editor. These books will not be "published" I just want to share them with people who have enjoyed my other stories. That's it. I want to have fun writing something and send it to people who will enjoy it. I don't want to be shamed publicly for not fulfilling my obligation to entertain you appropriately. I don't want to listen to complaints about how I'm not writing M/M correctly or deal with people who don't get that I'm not a monkey with a typewriter who can be trained to hit keys in a certain order with enough positive reinforcement. If my mistakes or my detest for cookie cutter romance bothers you, don't ask me for a copy.

I'm not saying you can't give me your honest opinion, of course you can. But there will be no potential readers waiting for your verdict before they decide to purchase. I fully expect everyone who asks me for a copy to be people I know and interact with everyday on GR. That crowd more than knows what they're getting into already.

Anyway, Book I still needs a little work ... I may or may not force it on Emma just to see what she thinks *lol* (she doesn't know yet) ... but if you're interested let me know and hopefully I'll have something for you in a couple of weeks.

Then I can focus on Book II ^_^
2 likes ·   •  12 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 11, 2012 21:06
Comments Showing 1-12 of 12 (12 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Emma Sea (last edited Oct 11, 2012 10:05PM) (new)

Emma Sea eeep, guilt much? Venting is good though. Feel free to guilt me.


message 2: by Isa (new)

Isa K. Sea's liver says, Someone stop her! wrote: "eeep, guilt much? Venting is good though. Feel free to guilt me."

Why guilt? o.o


message 3: by Emma Sea (new)

Emma Sea Are you kidding: how about guilt for opening my review of Hockey with the fateful words "Not an m/m romance"? It's like I was reading a guide for how to make you feel sick.

Also guilt for DNFing Freelancers, but that's minor compared to the first one.

But I am sorry :(


message 4: by Isa (last edited Oct 12, 2012 05:12AM) (new)

Isa K. Sea's liver says, Someone stop her! wrote: "Are you kidding: how about guilt for opening my review of Hockey with the fateful words "Not an m/m romance"? It's like I was reading a guide for how to make you feel sick.

Also guilt for DNFing ..."


Pffffttttt.. first of all the you open your review with words "Not an m/m romance; rather a classic bildungsroman with added hot gay sex." ... I'm not talking about comments like that. I'm talking about comments that use my atypical definition of romance as a criticism and imply that my books are not worth reading because they can't be categorized or because they "fail" at being in one genre or another by not following an agreed upon formula for that genre. Simply pointing out that there's a better word to describe something I've written, or maybe it fits better in one genre than another is not something that irritates me at all.

Frankly, warning readers that something I've written doesn't really fit what they're used to in M/M doesn't bother me either, because that's true and anyone who just wants a nice and easy love story probably shouldn't buy anything I've written. But some people are so smug about it and act like they have to take me down a peg for daring to think I could publish something in this genre. How dare I not ask proper permission to write things that involve men fucking other men up the ass!

As for DNFing The Freelancers ... don't feel guilty, it was really good feedback and it will just make it all the more fun to go all Clockwork Orange on you when I'm done fiddling with the final draft >D


message 5: by Isa (last edited Oct 12, 2012 05:16AM) (new)

Isa K. I should also add the obvious: if your opinion annoyed me, frustrated me or offended me in anyway Emma I would stop asking for it :D

The fact that I'm getting to the point where I'm always distracted while writing by "What Would Emma Think?" suggests the exact opposite *lol*


message 6: by Emma Sea (last edited Oct 12, 2012 05:39AM) (new)

Emma Sea Isa wrote: "it will just make it all the more fun to go all Clockwork Orange on you when I'm done fiddling with the final draft"

That sounds like a plan :)

EDIT: am still never using that phrase again in a review though. Because I thought about it a lot tonight, and you're right. It's not useful to dicuss a book by pigenholing it, or rather by explaining why it doesn't fit the pigenhole you expected, or why it isn't what you thought it should be. I don't mean in my reviews of your books, specifically, but rather my reviews in general. So I'm going to work on not doing that.


message 7: by Isa (new)

Isa K. As long as you don't change any of your current reviews ;)


message 8: by Hal (new)

Hal Evergreen Oooh, I want to read it! *Jumps up and down, waving arms*

Isa wrote: "I hate that when you publish something people can fill a review with praise but then caution others against reading because it won't deliver the pre-packaged fantasy they want. It's unbelievably frustrating to be told that good writing is about following the formula."

For the record, when I point out in a review that a book doesn't follow a set formula or conform to certain labels, it's never meant as a slap in the author's face. Like it or not, a lot of readers do want the formula. I like to make sure that anyone following my reviews is informed about what they're getting in a book, just like I want to know when a book contains themes that I prefer to avoid.

Sea's liver says, Someone stop her! wrote: "It's not useful to dicuss a book by pigenholing it, or rather by explaining why it doesn't fit the pigenhole you expected..."

Again, it's useful to readers who want something very specific from their romances. It isn't a criticism to say, "this book isn't X." It's a statement of fact. It's part of a reviewer's job.


message 9: by Isa (new)

Isa K. No that's true. I do understand that. I dunno I guess it's hard for me to express myself correctly on this topic...probably because I'm in no way objective. I didn't mean to imply that people shouldn't review this way or that way (though rereading it now I suppose I sort of did ... My apologies!) I was just trying to provide context for the decision. I don't want people to think that I'm trying to pull something cliquey and elitist. It's just reviewers do feel an obligation to address reader expectation, if I publish I have to submit to that process but if it's private there's no obligation to address anyone's expectations.


message 10: by Emma Sea (new)

Emma Sea Yes, it is letting other readers know what to expect, but if I'm defining a book as "yes, this is a romance" or "no, this isn't a romance" (just for example) then that boundary-keeping reinforces a politics of inclusion and exclusion. Not that many years ago if a book had actual sex in it then it wasn't romance, it was erotica, and a lot of bookstores (lol, remember them!) wouldn't stock it. Let alone gay sex!

In life, there is absolutely nothing I hate more than "X is a girl, therefore X likes shopping and doesn't like maths". But if I'm saying X isn't a romance, because a romance does this and this and doesn't do this, am I not doing the same thing?

The romance genre will grow and change, it should grow and change, so if I am labelling things, isn't that a way of saying "this book shouldn't be like this if it wants to be a romance" and stifling that very change?

I'm still kind of thinking it through.


message 11: by Hal (new)

Hal Evergreen Sea's liver says, Someone stop her! wrote: "In life, there is absolutely nothing I hate more than "X is a girl, therefore X likes shopping and doesn't like maths". But if I'm saying X isn't a romance, because a romance does this and this and doesn't do this, am I not doing the same thing?"

Noted. I realize there is a danger of reinforcing the narrow definition "romance" by stating that certain books are not romances because they don't do X. I tend to call anything that has any sort of romantic thread (or even a hint at the possibility of future romance) a romance. But if I call something like, say, The Condor a romance, I'm creating expectations in some readers that might not be fulfilled by the book. A reviewer needs to be aware of what a term like "romance" will convey to certain readers and address those expectations, even if the reviewer doesn't agree with them.


message 12: by Hellga (new)

Hellga Frankly I do not give a s**t if book meet certain criteria to be defined as "romance", "horror", "mystery", etc. I care about book being interesting, attention gripping, emotionally moving. Those who worship labels can shove them where sun does not shine. If the book is good, it is good regardless of what genre people what to slap on it, such trivia does not matter.
I love your hockey series and I sincerely hope you will continue writing. I am sure I am not the only one who wants to know what happens next. In the meanwhile I am off to read Freelancers and I do not care in the slightest how crowd wants to label it.


back to top