date
						  
						newest »
				
		
						  
						newest »
				
        message 1:
      by
      
          Laura Lee
      
        
          (new)
        
    
    
      Sep 14, 2012 05:23PM
    
    
      Take it as a compliment that someone wants to know about your next book, whether you have to pee or not. It's your bread and butter. As far as Kate is concerned she should have known better.
    
          reply
          |
      
      flag
    
  
      I think Kate had every right to expect privacy in that setting. However, shooting the photographers might be a teensy bit much.
    
      I'm with Laura Lee and Jan--I was 100% with you until those comments. What if the compliment the person in line had paid you was "what a pretty dress?" Would you feel as resentful if they were just being a fellow human making conversation in the restroom line, rather than a fan making conversation? I'm sure you do run into intrusive behaviors as an author, and I am sorry for it, but that example was pretty innocuous. And as for advocating killing someone...that is very scary indeed. Especially since, as you said, the magazine chose to publish the photos too. Should the bodyguards also go shoot everyone at the magazine offices, and the people who buy the magazines?
      After what happened to her mother in law on August 31, 1997, it's shocking people are still allowed to intrude on this family's privacy. I hope the paparazzi will get their comeuppance in one form or another. How would these paparazzi like to experience the invasion of their privacy? I bet they would not like it.
    



