I never understand the argument against conservationism. Most of the time, the arguments are economical: “If we stop allowing people to hunt/fish/etc. here or regulate the volumes, we will cause the loss of jobs, money, etc.” That, unfortunately, is very shortsighted for two reasons. First, it ignores our position as planetary stewards. At the top of the food chain, we must regulate both ways. We must consume more when a species over populates an area and we must not consume as much when a sp...
Published on September 01, 2012 14:47