Memory
Memory is a record of things and events that can be recalled later. Does that mean if we don’t have a record of it, it doesn’t exist or didn’t happen?
The famous philosopher George Berkeley said: “If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?” It is primarily questioning that if no one knows about something, does it not exist. Maybe. But it is not my reality unless I know about it.
Therefore, memory creates reality.
Can we then say whatever we perceive from our senses is expressed information? It is, however, unknown how the universe stores it. We have cracked the DNA impression at some level but not ‘how’ it is preserved. The smallest natural storage device visible to our naked eyes is a seed. It can replicate its kind perfectly, yet we cannot see/read the stored information. Can we then say that natural memory is intangible unless expressed? This supports the possibility that there could be so much more that is not expressed, so it doesn’t exist for us.
Similarly, human devices store information as electrical pulses that can be read/written in programming languages, which can be expressed as images or texts. Unless the program is executed, one cannot know what is stored.
Therefore, expression is the key, as it is what we experience. This draw tweaks our previous understanding: memory combined with our experience creates reality for us.
Does that mean if we can somehow create a memory and store it as an experience, it will be genuine to us even if it didn’t happen? Can we then even know if what we are experiencing is truly happening?
If you enjoyed this, read i$UBSCRIBE, which progresses precisely like machine learning. It is the basis of AI evolution. My take challenges what we believe to be artificial vs. real.
The famous philosopher George Berkeley said: “If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?” It is primarily questioning that if no one knows about something, does it not exist. Maybe. But it is not my reality unless I know about it.
Therefore, memory creates reality.
Can we then say whatever we perceive from our senses is expressed information? It is, however, unknown how the universe stores it. We have cracked the DNA impression at some level but not ‘how’ it is preserved. The smallest natural storage device visible to our naked eyes is a seed. It can replicate its kind perfectly, yet we cannot see/read the stored information. Can we then say that natural memory is intangible unless expressed? This supports the possibility that there could be so much more that is not expressed, so it doesn’t exist for us.
Similarly, human devices store information as electrical pulses that can be read/written in programming languages, which can be expressed as images or texts. Unless the program is executed, one cannot know what is stored.
Therefore, expression is the key, as it is what we experience. This draw tweaks our previous understanding: memory combined with our experience creates reality for us.
Does that mean if we can somehow create a memory and store it as an experience, it will be genuine to us even if it didn’t happen? Can we then even know if what we are experiencing is truly happening?
If you enjoyed this, read i$UBSCRIBE, which progresses precisely like machine learning. It is the basis of AI evolution. My take challenges what we believe to be artificial vs. real.
No comments have been added yet.
