One Last Look: A Writer's Plea (To The Reviewer)

ONE LAST LOOK: A WRITER’S PLEA (TO THE REVIEWER)

It’s a given fact that all writers will get bad reviews in their lifetime. Some of those will be deserved; a work unpolished, a first effort not reworked sufficiently, or simply bad grammar, etc. But some of those won’t be. The crux hangs, of course, on the reviewer. It is their opinion which flavors the review, making it either praise or condemnation. That is as it should be. Yet I make this plea on behalf of all writers, everywhere: Take one last look, and make sure that you meant all that you said.
There is no age limit I know of to be a reviewer for most review sites. If you run your own blog, there is no criterion at all that must be met. Don’t misunderstand me; I’m not saying that blog sites are less than qualified to judge what books are worth reading, or that they aren’t entitled to speak their views. I’m saying that anyone and everyone can be a reviewer, or post a review. This is not a bad thing, in and of itself. The more reviews any item has, the more information those looking to buy have at their fingertips. But when anyone can say anything about anything with a few clicks, it makes for almost no responsibility on what is said, or the fallout that will follow because of the review that is written.
I admit to being guilty of “passionate reviews” in the past. I have read books that were awful; who hasn’t? I have been angry at writers that wasted my time, or led me up to a climax that fell flat. Not all books are of five star quality. Part of the reason I began writing was because I longed for a story that no current writer provided. But there is a fine line between being honest, and being cruel, just because you can. Please know the difference.
No writer I have thus met throws together a piece, and sends it off. Some writers spend years perfecting a novel, or just a short story. We attend workshops, we join critique groups, we do whatever we can to hone our talent, to make what we produce the best it can be. We are always trying to improve, to write a better story with each new idea. Why then, is there so little respect given to an author who has spend countless hours giving you that book you have spent, at most, several hours reading?
Publisher writers are not amateurs in any sense of the word. I haven’t chosen this often grueling career with the sole intent to get rich. My goal is to give you, the reader, a tale to hopefully make your life a little more exciting, a little more romantic, or a little more thrilling. If I disappoint in that lofty goal, I apologize. It certainly wasn’t my intention.
This is my plea, dear reviewer: take one last look, before you hit enter and seal my success or my doom with your words. Think about how you would feel as you read the words you have written, if they were aimed at your work. I’m not asking for you to give me a five star review, or change your opinion. Just give one last look. There are ways to critique that encourage, not discourage. If your goal is simply to warn potential readers concerning inadequacies in my work, push send. If your aim is to not only give your opinion, but also to motivate me to do better, then take one last look. Give me not just correction, but inspiration.
4 likes ·   •  23 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 29, 2012 04:45 Tags: one-last-look, reviewing-advice, tara-fox-hall
Comments Showing 1-23 of 23 (23 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Jenny (new)

Jenny Twist You are so right. You've made me really think about how to do it better. Thank you, Tara!


message 2: by Tara (new)

Tara Hall Thank you for your kind words, Mrs. T. :) I'm very glad you liked my essay.


message 3: by Lynette (new)

Lynette Sofras Excellent, Tara - I hope EVERYONE reads this and takes note - I'm certainly trying to tell everyone about it!


message 4: by Tara (new)

Tara Hall Thank you Lyn...I was hoping to go viral with it! :) BTW, if that's your kitten in the photo, please give her or him a hug for me :)


message 5: by Lynette (new)

Lynette Sofras Sadly the kitten is not mine - just a little stray I found somewhere in cyberspace.
Would you like me to copy across my Facebook comment? I am totally with you on this as I've seen the pain thoughtless reviews can cause.


message 6: by Tara (new)

Tara Hall Sure, Lyn. I would like the plea to reach as many reviewers as possible. If just one reviewer saw this and added a few words to their current review to encourage the author to do better, it would be worth it!


message 7: by Lynette (new)

Lynette Sofras You've got it, sweetie...um, just as soon as I can navigate my way back to Facebook (which I've never been able to understand - Lol - hmm - didn't someone promise me a lesson?!)
So many writers take reviews to heart. Of course we want honesty, but we don't deserve public humiliation and condemnation.
We should all take arms against this...I rather think I feel a new blog post coming on as well...


message 8: by Tara (new)

Tara Hall What can I say? I keep setting out a wineglass for you every night, but when you don't show up by 8pm, I keep putting it back in the cupboard. :)
Yes, lets start a revolution! Use whatever of The Plea that you want to. The Plea belongs to all writers, not to me. :)


message 9: by Lynette (new)

Lynette Sofras I may fail at Facebook but I can tweet like a good 'un on Twitter. Power to The Plea.


message 10: by Tara (new)

Tara Hall Power to the Plea! :)


message 11: by Deborah (last edited Feb 29, 2012 03:23PM) (new)

Deborah Court Very well said, Tara, I fully agree. Authors can learn and develop their writing by showing attention to well-meant reviews, they are immensely useful. I am happy about everyone who took the time to leave a reasonable review, good or bad.
But then, there are also a few reviewers - often they are even fellow writers - who are just mean and aim to hurt, sometimes obviously not even having read the book. Such reviews can be extremely devastating to someone who has spent months, sometimes years to write, finish and edit (many times) a book and publish it. I think this effort alone deserves some respect. So dear readers, you might like or dislike a certain book, but remember that authors are human beings like everyone else. However, constructive reviews are the best reward a writer can ever receive, and we thank you for this kind of invaluable feedback. ;-)


message 12: by Tara (new)

Tara Hall Very good points, Deborah :) Constructive reviews are the best ones. Thank you for commenting.


message 13: by John (new)

John Steiner I get the sense most reviewers do negative reviews because they didn't want to read the work in the first place, but their news editor assigned it to them. The review I got for my first book wasn't like that, because I talked to the guy who read it and reviewed it in the college paper.


message 14: by Jenny (new)

Jenny Twist I think one thing to remember is that you're reviewing that particular story, not the genre. It's no good marking down a story because it is not great literature if it is intended for a young audience, or to be a simple HEA love story. Mark it on its own merit.


message 15: by Tara (new)

Tara Hall Both good points, John and Jenny. :) So far, I've had free choice in what I review for the few review groups I volunteer for. I've been able to refuse reviews for a couple books I just couldn't get into. Books don't have to be great literature to be loved by people. They just have to have characters people can identify with :)


message 16: by Mysti (new)

Mysti Parker I've seen unfortunate posts from authors who rail against a bad review and got some terrible backlash as a result. However, I think you handled his with a lot of wisdom and grace. So thank you for the reminder of how to be not only constructive in reviews but also how to handle the harsher ones with grace.


message 17: by Jenny (new)

Jenny Twist Hi Sweetie. I'm going to do my own blog on reviews for Blak Rayne.


message 18: by Tara (new)

Tara Hall Thank you for the compliment, Mysti. I was feeling anything but graceful at the time :)

Wonderful, Jenny :) I look forward to it. Let me know when it posts :)


message 19: by Jenny (new)

Jenny Twist You don't get off that easily. I'm sending it to you!
I, personally, think your reviewer should have been hung up by his thumbs..... or something


message 20: by Tara (new)

Tara Hall LOL!
Your blog post was wonderful. I can't wait to see it online so I can comment! :)


message 21: by Ian (new)

Ian Loome John wrote: "I get the sense most reviewers do negative reviews because they didn't want to read the work in the first place, but their news editor assigned it to them. The review I got for my first book wasn't..."

I've worked at newspapers for years. It doesn't work that way; no newspaper "forces" certain reviews like that, as they're inundated with 100 times the books they have time or space to review. It's usually totally up to the reviewer what they pick. The rest usually get donated to charity or given away to staff.


message 22: by Tara (new)

Tara Hall R.S. wrote: "I think you summarized it all. I also believe some of these people are jealous of your capabilities and frustrated with their own shortcomings.
That being said, don't let these negatives reviews in..."

You are very sweet, R.S. Thank you for the encouragement. I also have had a lot of my novellas (and short stories from my anthology Just Shadows) labelled as too short. Truly, they are short, but most of those were written specifically for a market/contest with a strict word count (some had published online before appearing in the anthology). As for influence, its true that I haven't been writing anywhere near as many short stories for online publication this year as I did last year. Now I'm hoping when my novels publish this year that the reviewers aren't going to tell me I'm long winded. LOL Best of luck with your short stories, and paranormal tales! :)


message 23: by Tara (new)

Tara Hall L.H. wrote: "John wrote: "I get the sense most reviewers do negative reviews because they didn't want to read the work in the first place, but their news editor assigned it to them. The review I got for my firs..."
Hi L. H. Yes, in my experience, the books reviewed are chosen by the reviewers, not assigned. However, what do newspapers do when they have to publish a review/report on a new movie or book and no one wants to do it? Did that ever happen, in your time at the newspaper? I was always curious, as I remembered a review for "CATS" years ago where the reviewer said he hated cats in general, then proceeded to say why the play wasn't very good. It seemed clear to me that he hadn't chosen to review the play on his own. Yet it also didn't make sense that the newspaper had forced him to do it, as that would ensure a bad review. Do you have a theory? Thank you again for commenting :)


back to top