How to Get Hardcovers



Everyone has an opinion on ebooks these days. Some have added a fifth horsemen to the apocalypse and his name is eReader. Others are trying to discover just how to bestow sainthood on the Internet naming ebooks as an example of one of its many miracles. There are countless blog posts, magazine, and news articles still being written, and podcasts and talk shows still discussing the various electronic formats for literature. Precious few, debate the various incarnations of paper.
How often do you hear about the end of publishing as we knew it because of Allen Lane or Fanny Fern. You likely don't even know who they are, or how Saul Bellows tried to eliminate hardcover books.
This post was supposed to be about how you can get your hands on hardcover editions of the Riyria Revelations for those who wanted them, and it still is, but the explanation has taken an unexpected detour through the history of publishing in America that has enough strikingly similar connections to current events that I thought you might find the whole story interesting.
To begin with, we need to travel backward…
Long, long ago in a land far, far away—Europe—books were printed by a printer and sold unbound. If you wanted the pages put together you needed to take them to a bindery and there you could have it dressed up anyway you liked, pick the leather, the end papers, etc. As you can imagine this whole process was expensive.
Across the pond in the colonies, while there were printers who functioned as publishers, books were mostly imported from England. Eastern port cities like New York, Philadelphia, and Boston became the source of books in the New World and this trend continues today, with New York retaining its publishing crown and Philadelphia most known for its medical publications.  
As it wasn't until 1886 that international copyright laws were established, in the early nineteenth century the open pirating of books was rampant in the United States. Half of books published in the US were by British authors who had their work copied and sold without their permission or seeing a penny of the revenue. I have to wonder if they ever considered SOPA (Stop Overseas Pirating Act.)
Books at that time were still expensive, too.  When the average working class man made $1-$1.50 and the average woman made $.30-$.40 and the average book cost $1 to $1.25, that meant a book cost a day's wage or more, which restricted the luxury of book buying and often, in lack of a nearby library, the very act of reading to the upper and middle classes. Published books were also being written almost entirely by men and in the high literary style of the day, which made it difficult for the less literate to enjoy.
Then in the 1850s Maria Susanna Cummins sentimental novel The Lamplighter sold 20,000 copies in twenty days, coming in second only to another woman, Harriet Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin. In a year that Melville and Hawthorn were happy to sell a couple thousand copies of their books, another woman, and newspaper columnist, Fanny Fern sold 70,000 copies of her "conversational style"  ladies fiction book Fern Leaves from Fanny's Portfolio. Women's fiction was not just born, it was kicking down doors.
In 1855 Nathaniel Hawthorne famously wrote from Britain to his publisher:

America is now wholly given over to a damned mob of scribbling women, and I should have no chance of success while the public taste is occupied with their trash–and should be ashamed of myself if I did succeed.  What is the mystery of these innumerable editions of the 'Lamplighter,' and other books neither better nor worse?–worse they could not be, and better they need not be, when they sell by the 100,000.

I just can't read this and not think of Stephanie Meyers, or Amanda Hocking, and I wonder if this was the first shot fired in the battle between, not only sexual discrimination in literature, but the conflict of "good" literature and the sort that sells.
Then as the Civil War was getting underway a number of events caused an upheaval of another sort. With increased demand due to increasing literacy and new printing technologies, along with cheaper paper, and later the lowering of transportation costs due to the new railroads, books got cheaper. (Prior to railroads, the production of books stopped in the winter due to frozen rivers upon which logs were transported.) It was at this time that Beadle & Adam's invented the Dime Novel that created an explosion in the fiction market added in large part to the demand of bored soldiers having nothing to do to pass the time and enjoying small, light, cheap books.
While dime novels were a proper name for a series of publications, they became synonymous with cheap popular fiction that actually ranged in price from a nickel to twenty-five cents.  These were largely reprints of stories that had run as serials in "storypapers," eight page weekly newspapers-like publications.  They were largely sentimental, "lurid" stories written in common language and focused on western gunslingers, adventures, detective stories, and romances.  It was these "common man" popular novels that gave birth to genre fiction.
By the start of the twentieth century, publishers found that a larger format with less pages was cheaper to produce, and soon the dime novels transformed into magazines such as Popular Magazine, Nick Carter Weekly, (Nick Carter first appearing in a dime novel The Old Detective's Pupil) Wild West Weekly and the Detective Story Magazine.  Also known as pulp magazines, pulp fiction, or just The Pulps, by virtue of the cheap paper used.  
Street and Smith publishing who created Argosy, the very first pulp magazine, came up with the idea of specialized genres, making whole magazines that focused on one common story theme or subject, such as romances, detective tales, etc. These classifications form the basis of our modern day genres. Later in the twenties two other pulp magazines called Amazing Stories and Weird Tales popularized modern science fiction and fantasy.  
Then in 1935 Allen Lane founded Penguin Books and invented the modern day mass market paperback, with the idea that the classics ought to be available to the masses for the same price as a pack of cigarettes. (Which incidentally,  today sells from $4.74 in West Virginia to $11.90 in New York—still a good benchmark for the price of a book.)  This combined with comic books and television, killed the pulp market which ended in the late fifties.
Now after the advent of Lane's mass market penguins, there were two kinds of novels available, mass market and trade. The definitions being determined by distribution or where they are sold. Trades are books sold in bookstores, shops whose stock and trade are selling books. Mass markets books are sold anywhere: drug stores, grocery stores, airports, newsstands, etc.
In the early 1980's when inflation and declining sales were wrecking havoc with publishers and bookstores alike, the trade paperback became the new thing. Actually it had been around since the 50's, but used mostly as special editions until the 1980's when it was seen as the solution to a struggling publishing industry. A trade paperback is a paperback book, of any size—but often larger-than-rack-size—that is sold exclusively in trade stores (bookstores) and not mass marketed—although this is starting to change and the definition is becoming more and more obsolete. They are also of better quality binding and paper. At often half the price of trade hardcovers, the portability, and affordability made them attractive to readers and the restricted trade venue, made them attractive to booksellers. At one time it was believed that the day a big-name author opted to have their book debut in trade paper, would be the day hardcovers died. This hasn't happened even though in 1988 Saul Bellows (Pulitzer and Noble Prize winning author) opted to have A Theft, originally published in trade paperback with the hope of starting a trend.
Hardcover books are still seen as the most preferred luxury, binding for those who can afford it due to their durability, and sheer presence. Originally built of wood wrapped in stamped leather, this was made more economical by using heavy cardboard covered in cloth (which lent them the nickname of "Cloths".) Long about the middle of the twentieth century the cloth was replaced with clothette, a textured paper that vaguely resembles cloth, and the only real cloth might be covering the spine. Over this was placed a dust cover. (Calf's leather is still used for special fancy binding.)  
Traditionally hardcovers are typically reserved for authors who are expected to be successful—popular enough to attract readers to spend premium prices for their work as hardcovers often average $25. This then forms the start of a sales cycle, with a trade paperback being released the following year and depending on the level of sales in another year or two, the mass market paperback would be released. These repeated releases in different formats allow for three-times-at-bat, three chances to promote the novel and to gain revenue from all levels of the reading public. Less guaranteed authors work are likely to debut in original trade paperback form and never see a hardcover edition or mass market.
Given the choice I suspect most readers, who have shelf space, the money, and aren't required to haul their novels around with them, would opt for the Cadillac of book binding—the hardcover, and if possible the embossed, raised spine, gilded-paged, variety. That's a lot of conditions however. Most people like to travel with their novels just the same as the Civil War soldiers, and most avid readers can't afford to spend top-dollar on a book anymore than a laborer in the nineteenth century could. Still there are a few who love books, who when they find a special one they're willing to spend something extra for the chance to own a more permanent doorway into whatever world they see themselves visiting more than once. A portal they might plan to one day leave open for their children to walk through.  
And that brings me to the point of this post.
I was one of those not-so-guaranteed author releases that got the trade paperback treatment. I was delighted with Orbit's decision in this respect as I'm not sure people would spend the extra money for the hardcovers of a new author, and they offer a good balance between "affordable" and "quality." Still, nothing beats a hardcover for sheer unadulterated luxury in reading. Even if my books do great I never expected to see hardcover editions, maybe mass market, but not hardcover.
So it was wonderful to discover that when Orbit sold the subsidiary rights to a book club they planned to do a hardcover edition. The Book club in Question is SFBC.com (Science Fiction Book Club) which offers a wide variety of both fantasy and science fiction books in special edition versions. They have hardcover copies of the books in the following arrangements
• Theft of Swords Stand Alone  $12.99• Rise of Empire Stand Alone  $12.99• Heir of Novron Stand Alone  $12.99• Theft of Swords/Rise of Empire $22.99• All three books $34.99
They even have Heir of Novron as their Top Featured Book right now. And all three books are on their Top 100 List:
• #23 Theft of Swords• #28 Rise of Empire• #38 Heir of Novron
Like most book clubs they have a great introductory deal, specials (running a buy 2 get 1 free right now). You get your first 5 books for $1 then you have to buy 4 more at "regular price" within the next year.
For my $1 order I chose 5 Riyria Revelations (so I got 15 hard cover copies of my book for $1 – Sweet)
I recently ordered single copies of each so I got 3 more for $26 (one is free).  I've just about satisfied my requirements – I just need to buy 1 more by November 2012. But I'll probably stay in the club after I make the requirements as their prices are very good.
For those that don't want to "join the club" you can get the hard covers which are being sold on the Amazon Marketplace.  These are sold by individuals (and sometimes book collectors) so the prices vary but I've seen both the Theft and Rise for sale for $10.00.  I haven't seen any Heir of Novron but I think that's just because they are so "new" – I only got my order on Friday so it will probably be a few days until they start reaching the market.

2 likes ·   •  16 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 05, 2012 15:31
Comments Showing 1-16 of 16 (16 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Jac (new)

Jac Nielson Congratulations :) the series is well worth purchasing in Hardcover for my bookshelf.


message 2: by Michael (new)

Michael Great Jac - I think $10 or $13 is a great hardcover price. I'm glad that they aren't selling for $25 - $30. Especially considering each book actually has two stories in it.


message 3: by Tabatha (new)

Tabatha First, let me say thanks for the marvelous introduction of books. I learned some things I had not known. There's always and may always be too much discrimination against women, for whatever the reason may be, but in Hawthorne's case it sounds like one of jealousy. This reminded me of when I did research for my History of Science Fiction Literature research paper last semester, with all this talk of Dime Novels and The Pulps. It also reminds me that last month I read my first detective novel Red Harvest, and it was alright. I do plan to read more detective related fiction, or as I like to call it: Noir. I don't own a lot of Hardcover copies of books myself. I'm not too overly hard on my paper backs so they tend to last me. Though I have picked up a few hardcovers at yard sales; I can see why some readers might like them better.


message 4: by Michael (new)

Michael Yeah I learned a lot in doing the research for this post. Some may not be interested in the history of publishing but I was so I thougth I'd share.


message 5: by Tabatha (new)

Tabatha Michael wrote: "Yeah I learned a lot in doing the research for this post. Some may not be interested in the history of publishing but I was so I thougth I'd share."

I found that I was very interested. I appreciate the time you took to do the research and to share it. ;)


message 6: by Michael (new)

Michael Smith Having just bought the first two in trade paperback (which is still very good quality) I probably won't opt to buy the hardcover editions, but for anyone looking for them that is an excellent price at only a couple more dollars per book than the trade paperback versions.

I also second Tabatha's gratitude for the lesson in publishing history. It is interesting to see how the publishing industry has evolved and continues to evolve with electronic books. Personally I prefer reading an actual book than something on a small tablet, but I imagine just like in the music industry, eventually convenience and speed of delivery will win over the vast majority which is a shame...


message 7: by Tabatha (new)

Tabatha I prefer reading books to ebooks as well. Nothing beats the smell of an old or new book.


message 8: by Michael (new)

Michael @Michael - yeah the speed of delivery thing is the issue that can't be beat. Especially when you read series. I pick up a book not sure if I'll continue but when it's 2:00 am and you just finished a great book and want to know what's next - nothing beats that auto download.


message 9: by Michael (new)

Michael @Tabatha - I do love reading "real books" - the biggest problem for me is storge - both in the house and while traveling. It's nice to take a vacation and have a ton of books on something that weight about a pound.


message 10: by Jonathan (new)

Jonathan  Terrington I like hardcovers but paperbacks work just as well for me. What I tend to do is only buy the series/books that appear worth it and borrow others from libraries. Personally I can't read e-books as I find it difficult to read long text from electronic screens. Paper and ink works well though.


message 11: by Simona (new)

Simona @Jonathan: Have you tried the eInk screen on Kindle? It can be read just like paper.

Another useful thing is, ebook readers usually allow to change the size of the font, so people that have to use glasses to read can manage without...
And I can bring all the Riyria books with me, plus all the Dresden Files, for the week-end. THIS is luxury.


message 12: by Jonathan (new)

Jonathan  Terrington I don't have the money for a Kindle. That would be the only way I'd think of reading ebooks. I really want a Kindle actually. Along with many other things...

I still just bring tons of actual books with me wherever I go. I figure you can only read several at a time anyway.


message 13: by Jac (new)

Jac Nielson Michael and Tabatha, I can imagine what you mean about reading "real" books. The smell of the paper and binding, the rustle of pages as they are turned and the weight of the book in your hands is still a magic I enjoy. I still purchase the hardcover editions of my favorites, I love to see them living on my book shelves. After purchasing an iPad I became a huge fan of the nook and kindle apps I discovered. Kindle especially. There is still the physical enjoyment I had with the reading of real books, although it is different and the fact that I can travel with all the books I need is a huge bonus.. A great author sends you into another world created in your imagination. The words are the pathway to that world and, at least for me, how I read them is of secondary importance.


message 14: by Michael (new)

Michael Smith Jac wrote: "Michael and Tabatha, I can imagine what you mean about reading "real" books. The smell of the paper and binding, the rustle of pages as they are turned and the weight of the book in your hands is s..."

Oh I have nothing against eBooks per se, and perhaps my opinion would change if I had a true Kindle with E-Ink and wasn't trying to read them on my Android tablet and phone... but my main gripe in that scenario is that the LCD & AMOLED screens tire my eyes out faster than reading ink on paper.


message 15: by Jonathan (new)

Jonathan  Terrington Michael wrote: "Oh I have nothing against eBooks per se, and perhaps my opinion would change if I had a true Kindle with E-Ink and wasn't trying to read them on my Android tablet and phone... but my main gripe in that scenario is that the LCD & AMOLED screens tire my eyes out faster than reading ink on paper."

I have the same problem. And I love the feel of paper and the smell too.


message 16: by Bryek (new)

Bryek I personally prefer a "real" touch/feel book myself, preferably a hardcover as they are much more durable over time and tend to not fall apart and just *feel* right. But unfortunately my current job doesn't really fit in with paper books. I work on oil drilling rigs as a medic and I am out here for three weeks at a time. now I usually go through a book in about a day or two. you can imagine carrying 11+ hard copy books around with you, it is not only heavy and exhausting but takes up a lot of space as well.
On the plus side to ebooks, you can always have a book on you without having to lug one around! works well for impromtu doctors appointments and any time you are forced to wait without a book in hand.


back to top