The smart meter swindle

I was mildly irritated by an advert for smart meters in my newspaper, placed by ‘The campaign for a smarter Britain.’ It claimed ‘If we all had a smart meter, the CO2 savings would be like planting more than 10 million trees a year.’ Note this says would not could - a claim that cannot be factual. The ad even emphasises this by having small print saying ‘Savings possible by customers measuring energy use and cutting waste.’ Possible is true, would be isn’t.

What the ad doesn’t point out is that exactly the same savings are possible without smart meters if people cut back on their energy use. It's entirely possible that everything the smart meter could achieve in energy savings could also be obtained by giving customers a laminated card with a priority list for things to switch off to save energy. At a tiny fraction of the cost.

In practice, smart meters are being pushed by the energy companies for two reasons. One is that they can save money by not employing meter readers. And the second is that they can introduce complex tariffs that charge more in peak periods, making billing much harder to understand and preventing users from getting the best deal.

Simples.

This has been a Green Heretic production.


2 likes ·   •  2 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 12, 2018 00:25
Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Jim (new)

Jim smart meters are being pushed by the energy companies for two reasons. One is that they can save money by not employing meter readers. And the second is that they can introduce complex tariffs that charge more in peak periods, making billing much harder to understand and preventing users from getting the best deal.

Your two stated reasons are correct.

Complex electric tariffs are hard to understand - however they are often rationally motivated.

When a euro (GBP) (USD) /kWh rate is highest - the time to which it applies corresponds to the time of greatest system demand (kW). TO supply that demand, smaller "peaking unit" are run - and those tend to be the least efficient unit, therefore most costly ones as well.

A monitor, showing the rate (and how that rate compares) help the user to decide to defer usage (or not).

ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS - CLIMATE CHANGE

Thanks for linking to the Green Heretic post - educated idiots have long substituted their romantic notions about the world for demonstrable (or historical) ones. I suppose this was going on long before the romantic idea of Rosseau and his bretheren got traction.

More interesting, to a wannabe-policy-maker like me, was statment that "we will have to engineer our way out of environmental trouble".

The Economist has reviewed various engineering solutions - somewhat recently in 2010 and in years more-distant.

One of the proposals is for ships with pumps - several hundred - deployed to/near the Arctic Ocean - to produce "low-level clouds". Put these together with ice-breakers and that could be a near-year-round effort. Add some large diesel re-fuelers with provisions, and shift-workers, and you've got something far more effective and several orders-of-magnitude cheaper than CO2 sequestration.

Plus - "Salty rain" (or salt precipitation over oceans) sure seems to be environmentally friendly.

Ron Bailey at Reason has published related articles:

https://reason.com/archives/2008/06/1...

https://reason.com/archives/2009/08/1...

http://reason.com/archives/2009/11/03...


In the first article, Bailey discussed Stephen Salter's early calculations on seawater cloud nuclei proposal. He found no current updates, but the Intellectual Ventures StratoShield proposal is discussed at the the link below

(involve "simulating volcanic eruptions")

http://www.intellectualventureslab.co...


message 2: by Adam (new)

Adam The radios (wifi?) in these so called smart meters might be a concern when there are so many (like an apartment block) in one spot and in proximity to young people sleeping and playing nearby.

As with any wireless signal it's open to hacking/surveilling especially if the encryption isn't strong or properly implemented. The pranks kids today will do on their neighbours. Which won't be funny when the freezer melts or medical devices play up.


back to top