Goodreads conversation on KIRKUS review

SONORA PASS KINDLE/AMAZON GRAPHIC NOVEL KIRKUS REVIEW

Here is a list of  items I regrettably have identified in the SONORA PASS KIRKUS review !

(https://cms.kirkusreviews.com/book…/jaime-olmos/sonora-pass/)

I will be very happy if I succeed at getting other Indie authors to question the benefit and hence avoid an unsavory experience while at the same time saving $450 . 

ITEMS – 

The KIRKUS review focused heavily on piddly trivial handwritten “typos” in a 20,000 word graphic novel.
The KIRKUS description/highlights of the story is terrible.

A high school senior could have done a better job. It is as if the reviewer wanted to make sure to prove that he did read the whole script. However, he read it so quickly that he did not understand or follow the plot very well.

More than likely it is the case that the reviewer had very little time to complete the job and so he focused on looking for “flaws”.

For example there is an illustrated banner that has “1974-1996” JABBERWOCKY reunion but elsewhere the banner shows as “1971-1996” JABBERWOCKY reunion.

Is this something important to review? This is the sort of review a grade school teacher would do on a kid’s paper …

(You may not believe this but I was aware of this irrelevant discrepancy, but had decided to keep it because I liked how KEVIN NICHOLS illustrated the number 1974 versus the actual real number 1971