date
newest »

message 1:
by
Asghar
(new)
Jun 21, 2017 02:21PM

reply
|
flag


Leprosy is definitely still a serious concern. But I didn't know all the information you just posted, always good to know. Yes, I think as a whole, we have curbed the paranoia regarding this disease.
..............The difference is that we now have the means to treat it, whereas Baldwin had little to combat it besides prayer...........
This is very poignant.
I'm waiting for you to write a novel where Jane Shore is the main subject. She's one of my favorite historical figures. And you are one of my favorite, favorite writers.

Personally, I appreciate it, even if it means some historical figures have bit parts. Seems like there's been a lot of historical authors recently, who shall remain nameless, who've squeezed out five books from the exact same events only writing each one from a different character POV. I find that to be a bit of a dull rehash, if not far worse - things which I shall hold my tongue on.

haha, I love this comment. Of course, you are right and spot on. But one can wish , right? I just loved the Jane Shore bit in Sunne in Splendour.

I've always found Syvlia Plath to be a very interesting woman. Does she actually appear in your novel, Asghar? Would you feel comfortable telling us more about your novels? Are they all set in contemporary times?

I agree, because of your fondness for Jane Shore, she seemed more appealing to me. I liked her more because of it. Love that tub scene, that was very humanizing. Indeed, I have a soft spot in my heart for lesser-known characters and gentle monsters esp those distorted by history. Oh, absolutely. We must move forward, never backwards, never.
Oh, I adore Sylvia Plath's work, especially Ariel, the unabridged version. Gosh, no. She doesn't appear in my novel. I wish. I don't think I am skilled enough or confident enough to feature a historical figure. But that's an interesting idea, if I ever did do something with it, then I'd like it to be the way it was done in Immortality by Milan Kundera. So surreal and trippy. Have you read it?
Sure, I'd love to talk about my novels :) Are they all set in contemporary times? Well, sort of. See, my first novel was published in 2008 and it was set around 1999. It's basically about series of events that occur in a single day. It was a homage to Quentin Tarantino, with the nonlinear ending, twist and everything lol I titled it Wave of a Dark Ocean. It was released as Beyond Desire. You know how things get skewed in the publishing world :)
My second and current novel is called Mélancolie and as I mentioned before, it starts off in the 1940s/50s. It is a bit meandering novel, in the vein of Hemingway, Kerouac, Puzo where I try to explore the 60s and the 70s too. The book ends in 1974. It's about war. I tried to look at it from many angles. It's about a man, a woman, and a child, a girl, her name is. Mélancolie. They are a family but she is not their daughter. It's about an island. Not unlike the island in Henning Mankell's hauntingly beautiful novel Depths. An Island of chance encounters, island of hope, island of peace, island of illicit despair, and eventually an island of madness.
This book more than any other is heavily influenced by Poe, Martin, and um well, You :) Though of course it's not a historical novel, but I have tried to make it as fantastical as I could without actually turning it into a fantasy novel.
I have been trying to come with a prose of my own for well over sixteen years now. I think I got it now and the best way of describing how I write would be a mixture of Gothic genre and magic realism. It can be bit purple and overwrought, but writers can only work with the style they are comfortable with.
Lastly, The Sunne in Splendour is a personal favorite. Every time I read it, I learn something new and marvel at the expanse and depth of it. And thank you.

A "What If" having to do with EIII ... what if his son Edward had not gone to war on behalf of Pedro the Cruel? If he had lived to become king, would the Wars of the Roses been avoided and so many needless deaths prevented?




Haha, fantastic. I have always considered my second novel to be a bit fantastical, historical in scope at least. Makes me happy, you saying that. Thank you, so many great writers, and I am not just saying this including you have helped me, will always be grateful to such amazing talents. I think I have mentioned it before, Larry Brown is also one of my favorites. He is , well was, no doubt modern day Faulkner.

Born in the 16th century to impoverished Protestant Dutch nobles, he was raised Catholic at the Spanish court as boon companion to the future Philip II and had honours heaped upon him by Charles V. Trusted as a member of the inner circle, he was appointed as Governor of the Spanish Netherlands, where he grappled with the religious intolerance of the Spanish and angry Dutch nobles wanted to make him Statdholder and leader of an independence movement. William tried to negotiate a diplomatic outcome, but Philip felt betrayed and so kidnapped his eldest son from university in Holland and held hostage in Spain - William became leader of a rebellion and converted to Protestantism. There were mass uprisings, terrible battles and slaughters that ensued, and William gained funding from Queen Elizabeth I in England.
Philip was so furious he issued an explicit and publication assassination bounty on William, and in 1581 a young man met with William, ostensibly to discuss a petition, but in reality fired a handgun at him. The youth had packed the gun with too much powder, however, and it exploded in his hand, killing him. Part of William's jaw was blown away, but he lived. However, two years later a man who had infiltrated his household as a trusted retainer was able to take another shot at him, killing him. William was the first head of state ever to be assassinated with a handgun, and his death shocked contemporaries (not least in England, who feared their queen would be next). The Dutch were furious and inflicted a truly gruesome death upon the assassin - carried out over several days of torture.
Erudite, practical, tolerant... William sounds like just the sort of man that fascinates, well, me, and I thought perhaps you too, knowing your proclivities, Sharon. He never saw a truly independent Netherlands in his lifetime, but he is considered the father of the Dutch nation, and he is the ancestor of both Dutch and British royal families.