I just had a funny thought…

Hey you know what? I just had a random thought that pissed me off so bad, I'm having to work hard not to angry type and break a girly wrist. Do y'all remember this book review? Do you know what's in this book? Oh, there's a homeless man debating eating a dead baby, a little boy being anally raped by a molester ghost, a teen girl violently raped and tortured, a teenage Red Riding Hood seduced and molested by a lesbian wolf using a severed penis, a little girl masturbating her father, fucking a corpse, and THEN fucking her father after he confesses to murder; and the cream of the crop, a final selection with a white supremacist serial killer abducting and molesting a little girl while killing kids of various ethnicities. The story ends well for the killer, by the way.


While written with a genuine talent that few people could hope to match, this book was so morally repugnant, the author herself pulled it and decided to walk away from horror for good. In fact, I own the last print copy of the book.


And, the guy who published this and promoted it, the guy I fucking bought this book from, called me pro pedophile for a book I wrote.


I know people are hypocrites. I know that in my own ways, I have my own hypocrisies, and I try to forgive other people. But since this motherfucker went on a moral campaign against me, attacking my work as promoting sexual deviance, I'm not feeling so generous anymore.


I fully accept that I wrote a book with a disturbing topic, and I would not deny that the topic can be seen as offensive. But I'm trying to raise awareness of a problem, not promote a lifestyle. I'm sorry if some people don't see that, and I can't change the way they interpret the story.


But the dude who promoted a book full of sexual violence and rape against children should probably not be the one leading the charge about the morality of my writing.


Now please, J, go on and explain to your buddies how this is different, and the violent sick fantasies you promoted were okay, but the muted style of Peter the Wolf is vile and unfit for public consumption. I won't read your defense, but I know you'll have fun squirming to explain why the multiple graphic forms of fictional child rape you promoted are more socially acceptable than a single scene of molest in my story.


And that's why this was a funny thought, because no matter how you explain this away, J, you're still a motherfucking hypocrite.



 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on September 06, 2011 11:44
No comments have been added yet.