A Thankless Task

I've been relaxing between projects by watching old movies. A Woman Possessed got me thinking how sometimes the kind of story you want to tell necessitates the kind of characters you write.
Admittedly, most of my stories are character driven, but once in a while I've chosen to write a certain dynamic that necessitates one character being just not as likable as my usual cast members. A Vintage Affair, for example. Or Icecapade. Or the yet to be released Lone Star where part of the plot really depends on the protagonist's hot temper and tendency to fly off the handle. Not qualities I particularly admire, but interesting to explore (for me) in this context.
In A Woman Possessed, one of those 1950s English domestic dramas, a young doctor brings his new fiancée home to meet his neurotically possessive mother. The fiancée suffers from a heart ailment and darling Mummy is tempted to rid herself of her rival by aggravating the girl's condition. It's old school and uber-dramatic, of course, but it's notable for the fact that there's a great deal of everyone saying all the stuff you always wish characters would say in these situations but so rarely do. They talk. And they do ultimately work the situation out, although the ending sent the wrong message, I think.
Anyway, as far as characters, the American fiancée comes off the best in that she's spunky, frank, and gracious in the face of the cold and possibly murderous reception she gets. She's an orphan and she's been very ill--is still having heart attacks--so her reluctance to walk away from this relationship is psychologically sound. The mother, doesn't come off too badly because it's her job to be borderline nutso. She's elegant and charming and totally convincing, and as unreasonable as her wishes are, we sort of understand where she's coming from. The least likable character is the son. His role requires a staggering lack of sensitivity to both his fragile fiancée (especially startling since he's also her doctor) and his mother who he's sort of avoided for the past two years he trained to be a doctor because of mama's general over-bearingness.
The problem is, in order to get the dynamic of this story, he has to be dense as a block of cement. If he reacts like a normal bloke we won't get this awwwwkward situation of the three of them living on top of each other with the tension mounting as the poor fiancée attempts to assert herself and the mother and household servants watching her for weakness like hungry birds of prey.
The only way to avoid the son being a jerk is to tell a totally different story. But suppose the writer doesn't want to tell a different story? Suppose the writer simply wants to explore this dynamic and this situation and this plot?
This is the dilemma we sometimes face as writers. Readers of literary fiction tend to be a little more flexible on the issue of liability in main characters. In romance, many readers have a difficult time accepting a genuinely flawed hero.  Jerks are easier to love in real life than fiction!
3 likes ·   •  4 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 19, 2011 16:48
Comments Showing 1-4 of 4 (4 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by [deleted user] (last edited Aug 19, 2011 07:44PM) (new)

Wow...A Woman Possessed. I remember going to see this film for a double feature with my mother when I was a teen. It was this and Rebecca by Hitchcock...Throughout the whole movie my mom grumbled about psychotic Mothers in law and gutless men LOL...I learned my love for Noir from my parents, and I do love a flawed character. So bring them on please!

I think that is why your work resonates so much with me, it is very much character driven, your men can have a lot of darkness. I think that's what makes them so interesting.

Anyways, I may try and get this movie somewhere for when my mother comes to visit next month, it'll be interesting to see what she grumbles about now!


message 2: by Amy (new)

Amy Lane I think you're right-- readers of literary fiction ARE more likely to forgive a weak, passive, or flawed hero--but not necessarily.

One of the interesting things I've found while looking at Goodreads is that the great books--the CLASSICS--do not necessarily have stellar ratings. For example, To Kill a Mockingbird, or A Tale of Two Cities, which I will FREELY acknowledge to be better than anything I've written, have sort of appalling low scores. A lot of the time, it's because people FORCED to read them, (students very often) read the book and then HATE it because it doesn't have the tropes and the types they've come to expect in fiction that's purely entertainment. (Although I like to think that if we're doing our job in genre fiction, NOTHING is purely entertainment, that's beside the point!) People will subjectively hate a book that has an ending or a type that is not necessarily popular. If you're going to explore that type, trope, or motif, you're going to have to brace yourself for the hits--and know you were striving to do something greater than just a type, trope, or motif. (I've done this a couple times. Not easy. Never easy. Public opinion is HARD to buck!)


message 3: by Z.A. (last edited Aug 25, 2011 06:40AM) (new)

Z.A. Maxfield As readers, we gobble up the work of authors we like, whether literary or genre fiction, but there does seem to be a difference. In genre fiction, which I can only liken to big brand tea, we expect the first cup to taste like the last one. The more genre writers deviate from the expectation, the less likely a genre reader, one who reads a specific genre for a reason, is going to feel it.

For me genre romance is homeopathy. I expect it to make me feel a certain way. I've been thinking about that a lot lately actually, because as I've grown or shrunk or whatever as a writer, I find myself wanting to explore more obscure relationships. If I veer from well trodden paths I hear about it. Or I don't hear about it and I'm not sure which is worse. :D

I'll be looking for and reading whatever you write Maestro, as always.


message 4: by Josh (new)

Josh Lou wrote: "Oh those old movies where the characters talked, and not just in quotable one-liners!

I haven't seen this movie, but I wonder if the husband is anything more than an unavoidable plot device.

I ca..."


Yeah, sometimes in order to explore a certain dynamic some of the characters just have to operate like ciphers or symbols. Because real people are so darned predictably unpredictable. And they do have that bad habit of TALKING. ;-)


back to top