date
newest »

message 1:
by
Iset
(new)
Jan 28, 2017 02:50PM

reply
|
flag


I've been wondering about her half-brother Edward, recently. Often overlooked, of course, but by all accounts he was as precocious as her, and his marvellous diaries reveal (especially towards the end of his short life) an emerging set of strong opinions. I can't decide if he would have been as great a ruler as Elizabeth, or if he would've been much more of a militant Protestant. I'm curious - what do you think, Sharon? It's intriguing to think he may have been an enlightened ruler if only he'd lived, but I know history too well, and realistically I think he would've turned out quite militant, to the detriment of those unfortunately set against him.




Well, I hope for a Medieval event to be marked soon!



What I do find surprising and a little baffling, however, is that there is so much more about them, especially in visual media, than about any other period of English history (not to mention history of other countries) and why equally interesting and turbulent periods of English history, full of equally colorful and controversial historical figures, get so ignored. Why is their period supposed to be so much more interesting than the Conquest, or the Anarchy, or the Wars of the Roses, or the Civil War...? One of the reasons I enjoyed The Last Kingdom is that there's finally a TV show about a period in English history that is far less often covered (though there's also Vikings, which cover a close historical period and subject matter though from another perspective).
I can only think that it's a matter of industry laziness and adversity to risk-taking. Movies and shows about Henry VIII or Elizabeth have worked before, so let's have more of the same.

I've always found Elizabeth I a fascinating figure.
I have an impression that she had a lot in common with her great-grandfather Edward IV in the way they both seem to have preferred to avoid executions, killing and severe punishments when they were not necessary, and liked to make people love them rather than fear them, but were still capable of being absolutely ruthless when it was necessary and when their royal authority was undermined and their throne really at stake. Would you agree with that assessment?