Peter Rollins's Blog, page 26
August 6, 2014
Media
Phasellus commodo ut urna non iaculis. Sed a auctor libero. Suspendisse et mi in urna porta tempor. Ut ullamcorper diam a lacinia ornare. Donec eu dictum urna, et molestie ante. Vivamus erat erat, cursus sit amet gravida vel, sollicitudin sed neque. Curabitur lacinia erat eget dui varius, sit amet fermentum lectus volutpat.
Share on Facebook
Events
Fusce tristique bibendum lacinia. Ut sodales commodo nisl volutpat vestibulum. Curabitur commodo, eros ac aliquet euismod, odio velit bibendum justo, sit amet rutrum elit magna vitae lacus. Sed arcu ipsum, posuere et tortor in, lobortis bibendum ligula.
Share on Facebook
Blog
Nullam aliquet rutrum velit, eu tempor mauris varius vitae. Fusce fringilla leo in magna tempor, nec pellentesque turpis bibendum. Integer a mauris non dolor ullamcorper varius a sed felis. Sed eget neque sit amet mi hendrerit ultricies. Suspendisse dapibus augue sed dui adipiscing porttitor.
Share on Facebook
Divine Magician Test by Phil
July 29, 2014
Let Sleeping Gods Die, Torrance, CA
July 21, 2014
HighGravity Christ(ology), online
July 17, 2014
Transgressions Tour, Tulsa, OK
On certain levels one might expect the religious landscape of Tulsa (oftentimes referred to as the “buckle” of the Bible Belt) would be somewhat less than hospitable to this rather rebellious Irish theologian. However, this past February, Pete made his first visit to Tulsa and was received with open arms. Consequently, the provocateur, incendiary thinker, writer, and storyteller we know as Peter Rollins is coming back to Tulsa.
Transgressions, Tulsa OK
From the website:
Peter Rollins has gained an international reputation for overturning traditional notions of religion and forming “churches” that preach the Good News that we can’t be satisfied, that life is difficult, and that we don’t know the secret.
On certain levels one might expect the religious landscape of Tulsa (oftentimes referred to as the “buckle” of the Bible Belt) would be somewhat less than hospitable to this rather rebellious Irish theologian. However, this past February, Pete made his first visit to Tulsa and was received with open arms. Consequently, the provocateur, incendiary thinker, writer, and storyteller we know as Peter Rollins is coming back to Tulsa.
This is a ticketed event, but a word about tickets. The pricing of the tickets has been set as a way to recover the cost of the event…not make a profit on the evening. In the event that enough tickets are sold that funds are generated in excess of the expenses, those funds will be donated to John 3:16 Mission here in Tulsa.
Questions? tom.ingram@mac.com
July 15, 2014
If you don’t want your faith to be challenged, do read this post
In my last book there’s an interesting typo on the back cover. While Tony Jones assures me that he wrote, “If you don’t want you’re faith to be challenged, don’t read this book,” you will see on the back,
If you don’t want you’re faith to be challenged, do read this book
In analysis the analyst listens carefully and patiently for the precise moment when the person on the couch stumbles, makes a slip or hesitates. For it is at these moments that an unconscious truth is potentially being spoken. Ironically, it is precisely such slips of the tongue that the person on the couch attempts to dismiss with phrases like, “that’s not what I meant,” “or I just made a basic mistake.” Here they spoke something without intending it, they confessed something without meaning it, and the clinical work of analysis bears witness to the fact that such unintended sayings can act as a royal road to some undisclosed, and often unpleasant, truth. Hence psychoanalysis is a discipline that listens out for what everybody else ignores, passes over or just plain fails to see.
So what if we were to put The Idolatry of God on the couch and ask what this mistake (what is called a “sic” in publishing) might mean? Of course it is highly unlikely to be intended by anyone involved in bringing the book to press. The copyeditor would have no reason to do it on purpose, and the editors where unlikely to have left it in for the sake of malice. Indeed I’m very sure that I was shown a copy of the back cover before it went to print, and I certainly didn’t see the mistake.
Just like in daily life, the relatively large number of people looking at the book before its publication missed the slip entirely. Indeed, more than this, I’ve never once had anyone mention it to me, which leads me to suspect that there is virtually no one in the world who has actually noticed it.
But what truth might be held in this unseen Freudian publishing mistake?
I want to throw out one possible interpretation, and it’s this. The book itself is attempting to ask people to question their fundamental way of being in the world. Not just religious people, but those who describe themselves as secular (though the book is more aimed at the former). It’s making a demand… and the demand is to overturn our pursuit of wholeness and mastery so that we might find liberation through embracing a fractured existence without guarantees.
But what if this is precisely the kind of book one can read so as to broadly avoid such a fundamental change and maintain the status quo? What if many people read me precisely to feel a little bit edgy without having to actually do the work that I am asking? This is a point that Katharine Moody insightfully glimpsed in an article entitled “Becoming Church Mice: From Refusing to Lead to Refusing to be Led.” Here she writes,
Rollins’… courses like Atheism for Lent and The Omega Course [were] courses designed to send people off course. They were not so much offered as courses to be faithfully replicated than as inspiration… to depart from Rollins’ courses and create their own… His work tries to recall us to the fact that we are all poets, all singer-songwriters and story-tellers. For… [we] all weep and pray, all doubt and disbelieve, are all a/theistic. The community of faith is called to be a community of Poets… rather than of Critics. We are to all enter into this Crucifixion experience fully ourselves… But… in a reversal of the function of many other church leaders who believe on behalf of the community, are we letting Rollins disbelieve on behalf of the community? [Italics mine]
In other words, by reflecting upon the smashing of the idols are we really just doing the equivalent of having a nice daydream in which we imagine being freed from a horrible job so that we can wake up refreshed and actually go to it?
For dreams, at their worst, act to make our reality bearable.
Yet, perhaps an alternative is possible. For dreams, at their best, can lead into a fight where we struggle to change our reality.
Rendering it into something wonderful.
If you read my books, which way do you engage with them?
July 3, 2014
Epiphany Explorations, Victoria, Canada
Peter Rollins's Blog
- Peter Rollins's profile
- 314 followers
